Ik had me voorgenomen om niet te gaan speculeren over de oorsprong van het virus (man made / uit de natuur) en of er aan gesleuteld is (weaponized, om het dodelijker te maken) en wie het heeft verspreid (Amerika, of China zelf ?) danwel dat het mogelijk per ongeluk is ontsnapt uit een lab.
Eerst maar eens proberen deze gevaarlijke periode te overleven.
Dat gaat niet meevallen, want onze Powers That Be
(RIVM, Ministerie en Media) bezweren elkaar elke dag weer dat ze absoluut niet in paniek moeten raken en absoluut niet mogen overdrijven.
Je begrijpt: elke waarschuwing die je daar binnenskamers af geeft bewijst dat je slappe knieën hebt of conspiracy-prone bent en dat je wellicht niet bij de Powers That Be thuis hoort. Zo werkt dat psychologisch. Verstandige mensen worden als verraders gezien, vlak voor de oorlog.
Zoals Van Wolferen zegt: Het wordt pas echt gevaarlijk als ze elkaars onzin echt gaan geloven.
In de afgelopen 2 dagen zeker 8 keer naar journalisten gebeld. Niemand wil praten. Om gek van te worden.
Als je de cijfers van het RIVM neemt ( Ro=2 en CFR = 2 ) dan zie je dat als je niks doet aan non-farmaceutische interventie, NPI , (ze doen een heel klein beetje , maar absoluut niet genoeg) dat dan op 1 juli heel Nederland ziek is en we dan 1,3 miljoen doden zijn.
Dus: Als je het ècht als een griepje zou behandelen:
Op 1 juli 17 miljoen zieken en 1,3 miljoen doden.
Het handen wassen, mild isoleren, milde quarantaine , mild reisverbod,geen mondkapjes, geen scholen dicht,geen grote bijeenkomsten cancelen, geenwoord over airborne zeggen, geen woord over asymptomatische besmetting zeggen : dat halveert de uitbraak snelheid misschien. Dus dan is heel Nederland niet op 1 juli ziek, maar op 1 oktober.
Dus dan moet je 1 miljoen mensen redden middels ICU units in 8 maande,in plaats van in 4 maanden. Dat scheelt: 4 maand x 200 ICU's = 1000 minder doden, doordat we die halfslachte maatregelen nemem. Die helpen dus precies
100 mensen, ofwel niet 1.300.000 doden, maar 1.299.000 doden.
Het interesseert niemand, heb ik de indruk.
Krant nog steeds vol met nonsens, kletskoek en echte genante flauwekul.
Waarom maak ik me druk? Ik zou het echt niet weten.
De natuurlijke selectie moet zijn werk doen.
---------------------------------------------
OK, dat was mijn 'rant'. Even het hart luchten.
==============================
Taiwan is bepaald géén vriend van China, en hoopt dat Grote Broer America haar zal blijven beschermen tegen China.
Als er dus een Taiwanese professor -viroloog is die met een uitgebreid verhaal komt waarin hij uit legt aan de hand van genetische sporen, dat dit Virus niet uit China komt, maar uit Amerika, dan is dat de moeite waard.
Het verhaal voldoet aan de 'boerenverstand -check' voor geloofwaardigheid:
1) Man weet waar hij over praat.
2) Zijn verhaal doet hemzelf geen goed. Het zal hem opbreken.
3) Het verhaal is te verifieren voor deskundi
4) De brenger van het nieuws ( Romanoff) heeft ook een goede reputatie.
( Ook Japanse wetenschaappers zeggen: Virus komt uit VS. En ook Japan is vriend van VS en bang voor China. Credibility check: Hoog. )
Hier dus het gehele verhaal dat Romanoff op Global Research schreef.
China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the US?
Japan, China and Taiwan Reports on the Origin of the Virus
The Western media quickly took the stage and laid out the official narrative for the outbreak of the new coronavirus which appeared to have begun in China, claiming it to have originated with animals at a wet market in Wuhan.
In fact the origin was for a long time unknown but it appears likely now, according to Chinese and Japanese reports, that the virus originated elsewhere, from multiple locations, but began to spread widely only after being introduced to the market.
More to the point, it appears that the virus did not originate in China and, according to reports in Japanese and other media, may have originated in the US.
Chinese Researchers Conclude the Virus Originated Outside of China
After collecting samples of the genome in China, medical researchers first conclusively demonstrated that the virus did not originate at the seafood market but had multiple unidentified sources, after which it was exposed to the seafood market from where it spread everywhere. (1) (2) (3)
According to the Global Times:A new study by Chinese researchers indicates the novel coronavirus may have begun human-to-human transmission in late November from a place other than the Huanan seafood market in Wuhan.
The study published on ChinaXiv, a Chinese open repository for scientific researchers, reveals the new coronavirus was introduced to the seafood market from another location(s), and then spread rapidly from the market due to the large number of close contacts. The findings were the result of analyses of the genome data, sources of infection, and the route of spread of variations of the novel coronavirus collected throughout China.
The study believes that patient(s) zero transmitted the virus to workers or sellers at the Huanan seafood market, the crowded market easily facilitating further transmission of the virus to buyers, which caused a wider spread in early December 2019. (Global Times, February 22, 2020, emphasis added (2)
Chinese medical authorities – and “intelligence agencies” – then conducted a rapid and wide-ranging search for the origin of the virus, collecting nearly 100 samples of the genome from 12 different countries on 4 continents, identifying all the varieties and mutations. During this research, they determined the virus outbreak had begun much earlier, probably in November, shortly after the Wuhan Military Games.
They then came to the same independent conclusions as the Japanese researchers – that the virus did not begin in China but was introduced there from the outside.
China’s top respiratory specialist Zhong Nanshan said on January 27
“Though the COVID-19 was first discovered in China, it does not mean that it originated from China”“But that is Chinese for “it originated someplace else, in another country”. (4)
This of course raises questions as to the actual location of origin. If the authorities pursued their analysis through 100 genome samples from 12 countries, they must have had a compelling reason to be searching for the original source outside China. This would explain why there was such difficulty in locating and identifying a ‘patient zero’.
Japan’s Media: The Coronavirus May Have Originated in the US
In February of 2020, the Japanese Asahi news report (print and TV) claimed the coronavirus originated in the US, not in China, and that some (or many) of the 14,000 American deaths attributed to influenza may have in fact have resulted from the coronavirus. (5)
A report from a Japanese TV station disclosing a suspicion that some of those Americans may have unknowningly contracted the coronavirus has gone viral on Chinese social media, stoking fears and speculations in China that the novel coronavirus may have originated in the US.
The report, by TV Asahi Corporation of Japan, suggested that the US government may have failed to grasp how rampant the virus has gone on US soil.
However, it is unknown whether Americans who have already died of the influenza had contracted the coronavirus, as reported by TV Asahi. (People’s Daily, English, February 23, 2020, emphasis added)
( Volgens mij kan dit alleen als deze originele variant veel lagere Ro had dan 2 of 4)
On February 14, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said they will begin to test individuals with influenza-like-illness for the novel coronavirus at public health labs in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, and New York City.
The TV Asahi network presented scientific documentation for their claims, raising the issue that no one would know the cause of death because the US either neglected to test or failed to release the results. Japan avoided the questions of natural vs. man-made and accidental vs. deliberate, simply stating that the virus outbreak may first have occurred in the US. The Western Internet appears to have been scrubbed of this information, but the Chinese media still reference it.
These claims stirred up a hornet’s nest not only in Japan but in China, immediately going viral on Chinese social media, especially since the Military World Games were held in Wuhan in October, and it had already been widely discussed that the virus could have been transmitted at that time – from a foreign source.
“Perhaps the US delegates brought the coronavirus to Wuhan, and some mutation occurred to the virus, making it more deadly and contagious, and causing a widespread outbreak this year.” (People’s Daily, February 23, 2020) (1)
Shen Yi, an international relations professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, stated that global virologists “including the intelligence agencies” were tracking the origin of the virus. Also of interest, the Chinese government did not shut the door on this. The news report stated:
“Netizens are encouraged to actively partake in discussions, but preferably in a rational fashion.”
In China, that is meaningful. If the reports were rubbish, the government would clearly state that, and tell people to not spread false rumors.
Taiwan Virologist Suggests the Coronavirus Originated in the US
Then, Taiwan ran a TV news program on February,27,(click here to access video (Chinese), that presented diagrams and flow charts suggesting the coronavirus originated in the US. (6)
Below is a rough translation, summary and analysis of selected content of that newscast. (see map below)
The man in the video is a top virologist and pharmacologist who performed a long and detailed search for the source of the virus. He spends the first part of the video explaining the various haplotypes (varieties, if you will), and explains how they are related to each other, how one must have come before another, and how one type derived from another. He explains this is merely elementary science and nothing to do with geopolitical issues, describing how, just as with numbers in order, 3 must always follow 2.
click map to enlarge
One of his main points is that the type infecting Taiwan exists only in Australia and the US and, since Taiwan was not infected by Australians, the infection in Taiwan could have come only from the US. ( Of het ging van Taiwan naar USA en Au?)
The basic logic is that the geographical location with the greatest diversity of virus strains must be the original source because a single strain cannot emerge from nothing. He demonstrated that only the US has all the five known strains of the virus (while Wuhan and most of China have only one, as do Taiwan and South Korea, Thailand and Vietnam, Singapore, and England, Belgium and Germany), constituting a thesis that the haplotypes in other nations may have originated in the US.
Ja, dat kan ik volgen. Maar hoe heeft China nu zo ineens zo veel 'samples' van die zieke mensen genomen? In de VS zijn nog maar enkele weken geleden de eerste mensen ziek geworden...
Korea and Taiwan have a different haplotype of the virus than China, perhaps more infective but much less deadly ( Ro hoger, CFR lager) , which would account for a death rate only 1/3 that of China.
( NB: In Wuhan was de CFR 17% , maar in de provincies waar de ziekte later kwam, en iedereen goede ICU zorg kreeg was de CFR soms lager dan 1 % )
Neither Iran nor Italy were included in the above tests, but both countries have now deciphered the locally prevalent genome and have declared them of different varieties from those in China, which means they did not originate in China but were of necessity introduced from another source. OK. Dus dat zou dan uit de VS kunnen komen?
It is worth noting that the variety in Italy has approximately the same fatality rate as that of China, three times as great as other nations, while the haplotype in Iran appears to be the deadliest with a fatality rate of between 10% and 25%. (7) (8) (9) Als Wuhan 17% was, dan is dat precies zoals in Iran, en dat komt door: totaal onvoorbereid zijn. Niet door agressiviteit van die virus variant.
It is worth noting that the variety in Italy has approximately the same fatality rate as that of China, three times as great as other nations, while the haplotype in Iran appears to be the deadliest with a fatality rate of between 10% and 25%. (7) (8) (9) Als Wuhan 17% was, dan is dat precies zoals in Iran, en dat komt door: totaal onvoorbereid zijn. Niet door agressiviteit van die virus variant.
Due to the enormous amount of Western media coverage focused on China, much of the world believes the coronavirus spread to all other nations from China, but this now appears to have been proven wrong. With about 50 nations scattered throughout the world having identified at least one case at the time of writing, it would be very interesting to examine virus samples from each of those nations to determine their location of origin and the worldwide sources and patterns of spread.
The Virologist further stated that the US has recently had
more than 200 “pulmonary fibrosis” cases that resulted in death due to patients’ inability to breathe, but whose conditions and symptoms could not be explained by pulmonary fibrosis. He said he wrote articles informing the US health authorities to consider seriously those deaths as resulting from the coronavirus, but they responded by blaming the deaths on e-cigarettes, then silenced further discussion. …
more than 200 “pulmonary fibrosis” cases that resulted in death due to patients’ inability to breathe, but whose conditions and symptoms could not be explained by pulmonary fibrosis. He said he wrote articles informing the US health authorities to consider seriously those deaths as resulting from the coronavirus, but they responded by blaming the deaths on e-cigarettes, then silenced further discussion. …
The Taiwanese doctor then stated the virus outbreak began earlier than assumed, saying, “We must look to September of 2019”.
He stated the case in September of 2019 where some Japanese traveled to Hawaii and returned home infected, people who had never been to China. This was two months prior to the infections in China and just after the CDC suddenly and totally shut down the Fort Detrick bio-weapons lab claiming the facilities were insufficient to prevent loss of pathogens. (10) (11)
He said he personally investigated those cases very carefully (as did the Japanese virologists who came to the same conclusion).. This might indicate the coronavirus had already spread in the US but where the symptoms were being officially attributed to other diseases, and thus possibly masked.
The prominent Chinese news website Huanqiu related one case in the US where a woman’s relative was told by physicians he died of the flu, but where the death certificate listed the coronavirus as the cause of death. On February 26, ABC News affiliate KJCT8 News Network reported that a woman recently told the media that her sister died on from coronavirus infection. Montrose, Colorado resident Almeta Stone said, “They (the medical staff) kept us informed that it was the flu, and when I got the death certificate, there was a coronavirus in the cause of death.” (12)
We cannot ascertain the number of such cases in the US but since the CDC apparently has no reliable test kits and is conducting little or no testing for the virus, there may be others. Deze laatste voorbeelden zijn niet overtuigend voo rmij. Mensen maken al snel vergissingen.
***
Just for information
In the past two years (during the trade war) China has suffered several pandemics:
- February 15, 2018: H7N4 bird flu. Sickened at least 1,600 people in China and killed more than 600. Many chickens killed. China needs to purchase US poultry products.
- June, 2018: H7N9 bird flu. Many chickens killed. China needs to purchase US poultry products.
- August, 2018: outbreak of African swine flu. Same strain as Russia, from Georgia. Millions of pigs killed. China needs to purchase US pork products.
- May 24, 2019: massive infestation of armyworms in 14 province-level regions in China, which destroy most food crops. Quickly spread to more than 8,500 hectares of China’s grain production. They produce astonishing numbers of eggs. China needs to purchase US agricultural products – corn, soybeans.
- December, 2019: Coronavirus appearance puts China’s economy on hold.
- January, 2020: China is hit by a “highly pathogenic” strain of bird flu in Hunan province. Many chickens died, many others killed. China needs to purchase US poultry products.
The standard adage is that bad luck happens in threes, not sixes.
***
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc.
Larry Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has held senior executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an international import-export business. He has been a visiting professor at Shanghai’s Fudan University, presenting case studies in international affairs to senior EMBA classes. Mr. Romanoff lives in Shanghai and is currently writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research.
Notes
(9) Coronavirus has Mutated, Iran attacked by a Different Strain from Wuhan
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Larry Romanoff, Global Research, 2020
Toch maar eens gereageerd op RT:
ReplyDeleteRo for flu 1,38 which means after 20 weeks you have 178 people with flu, and as CFR = 0,1 nobody dies. Ro for Covid-19 is 2,2 according to WHO which means after 20 weeks you have 15 million sick and after 28 weeks the whole 7 billion of us. CFR is only 2% if you can help the 13 % who get very, very ill, in an Intensive Care Unit. If not, 6 % more will die. So 8% of world population will die if you treat this exactly as if it is only the flu. Those are the parameters that the WHO uses. The best specialist in the world about transmission of Covid-19, Dr Mark G Wathelet, is much less optimistic. He says this Covid-19 has Ro= 6. That would mean the whole world will be infected after 12 weeks. If we think it is just the flu. But, you know, thinking is hard. Dying is easier.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5D7S1-9r3DY
In Europa zijn ze reaactief in plaats van pro-actief.
ReplyDeleteDat ziet Dr John Canpbell (https://youtu.be/XDSq3cgWaAg?t=1250 )
en ook Barrett ziet dat. https://youtu.be/-HTlfc0syg4?t=317
En Corona heeft de ingewanden van de deep state bereikt!!!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.trunews.com/stream/aipac-super-spreader-did-israeli-lobbyists-infect-u-s-congress-with-coronavirus
Ik kreeg zojuist het idee dat het misschien verstandig zou zijn om nu naar China te gaan.
ReplyDeleteHet enige land ter wereld dat mij goed kan verplegen als ik het virus krijg. Hier al dat natuurlijk niet lukken.
Zit ik bij de sterkste helft van de 50 plussers? Zo niet, dan wordt het einde verhaal.
Dr John Campbell zegt: De kans is echt heel groot dat ik binnen 2 maanden ook dat Coronavirus krijg.
Hier ongeveer: https://youtu.be/XDSq3cgWaAg?t=680
Wees gerust @Jan, @Rootman vertrouwt volledig op de westerse mainstream science, hoewel hijzelf niet ziet hoe mean die sciene is.
DeleteBeter dan zilverwater van dr Schwanzknuppel, zo denk ik (overigens makkelijk en bijna voor niks zelf te maken als je op een smurf wil lijken).
DeleteReligie blijkt een enorm besmettingsrisico met zich mee te brengen:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/03/04/evangelical-service-eastern-france-emerges-centre-new-coronavirus/
Hoofdredacteur Volkskrant wordt geïnterviewd:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/is-er-te-veel-aandacht-voor-het-coronavirus-in-gesprek-met-hoofdredacteur-pieter-klok~bbfff530/
Wij moeten het dempen. Geen paniek veroorzaken.
Voorpagina en koppen zijn terughoudend.
In de artikelen gaan we verder.
"Ik denk dat de angst voor Corona meer schade doet dan het virus zelf'
Krant moet ook entertainment zijn.
Als we iets anders hebben (Super Tuesday) dan doen we even niks aan Corona.
Wij als kwaliteits krant moeten ook wel echte belangrijke info brengen.
Over Dré en Bridget kunnen wij niet echt schrijven.
AD en Telegraaf doen dat wel, dat is hun rol.
Journalistiek is ook een beetje koken: er moeten ook groenten in. Niet alleen friet en mayonaise, want dan ga je vroeg dood...
Pieter Klok heeft ook zo'n zelfgenoegzaam, licht hautaine stem/houding. Ik herinner me niet dat er vroeger zulke mensen waren. Toen had je wel de boven-klasse die elitair klonk, maar daar hoorden journalisten niet bij.
Op het eind blijkt dat hij totaal geen idee heeft van de vele vele miljoenen doden die zullen komen als hij en de 'deskundigen' zo door gaan.
Bij grote gebeurtenissen die veelemotie oproepen moet je altijd een zakelijke feitelijke toon aan slaan.
Het is alleen net zo sentimenteel! Kuddegedrag en pseudo- nuchterheid is niet objectief.
DeleteVandaag geen updates. Dat zegt ook heel veel, want dat betekent dat ze bij het RIVM dus nog gewone kantooruren aanhouden! We hoeven ons dus in elk geval geen zorgen te maken dat ze oververmoeid zullen raken!!!
ReplyDelete