Saturday, December 11, 2010

65. Citaten

This blog:  http://tinyurl.com/4qfubqo



 Kies het citaat met het nummer uit uw tekst

Choose the qoute with the same number as in your text. 

(1)  Wij leven in een joodse Matrix. Zij bepalen wat wij denken. 


Dit is de summary op Amazon van Israel Shamir's boek 'The Masters of Discourse' :
     
Welcome to the new world order, where mass media, a fully integrated public-opinion-forming machine of mind control had rendered the Left and Right obsolete and subservient to Zionism. Who are the people who own and operate this machine? Are they actually the Jewish Lobby? No, says Shamir. The formidable Jewish Lobby is just the visible tip of the iceberg, while below there are miles and miles of solid ice: media lords, chief editors, their favourite university pundits – in short, the Masters of Discourse. In this third volume of his writing, Israel Shamir travels around the world to find the reason for their captive hold over our thinking.


                                                 ------------------------------------------------
(2) Citaten waaruit blijkt dat joden de bestaande samenlevingen kapot willen maken.

Michael LedeenClaes G. Ryn’s artikel over Leo Strauss bevat een citaat uit een boek van Ledeen:   According to Ledeen, “Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day . . . . Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions
. . . . [We] must destroy them to advance our historic mission.


Vertaling: 
“Wij breken iedere dag de oude orde af. (...) Onze vijanden hebben altijd haat gekoesterd voor deze wervelwind aan energie en creativiteit die hun tradities bedreigt (...) Wij moeten hen vernietigen om onze historische missie te bevorderen.”


Of :  Schrijver Douglas Rushkoff ( op 2 min.)
zegt op deze video: "The thing that makes Judaïsm dangerous, to everybody, to every race, to every nation, to every idea, is that we smash things that aren't true: We don't believe in the boundaries of nation states, we don't believe in the idea of gods that protect different groups of people. You know, those are all artificial constructions. Judaïsme teaches us how to see that. In a sense our detractors (lasteraars) have us right in that we are a corrosive  force. We are breaking down the false gods of all nations and all people, because they are not real. And that's very upsetting the people. "

Hij zegt dus: ‘Wij joden moeten de culturen van andere volken wel vernietigen omdat die volken zich vergissen. Wij joden hebben de ware god.’

                                             ----------------------------------------------


(3)  Is de J.P. Morgan bank een front voor de Rothschilds ? 


'Yes' say these sources: 
A) Uit: Web of Debt.   Ellen H. Brown.
De kans is groot dat de machtigste bank van Amerika tussen 1880 en 1920 , J P Morgan, in feite een front was voor de Rothschilds: 
Citaat uit Web of Debt: 
Although the Rothschilds were technically rivals of the Peabody/
Morgan firm, rumor had it that they had formed a secret alliance.
Nathan Rothschild was not well liked, in part because of religious
prejudice. Morgan biographer George Wheeler wrote in 1973, “Part
of the reality of the day was an ugly resurgence of anti-Semitism. . . .
Someone was needed as a cover.” August Belmont (born Schoenberg)
had played that role for Rothschild during the Civil War; but when
the Belmont/Rothschild connection became common knowledge, the
ploy no longer worked. Wheeler wrote, “Who better than J. Pierpont
Morgan, a solid, Protestant exemplar of capitalism able to trace his
family back to pre-Revolutionary times? 


B)
George Peabody founded The House of Morgan in 1838 in London.  Peabody then was a business associate of the Rothschilds. In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents. Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds, “…preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company”. 

  C) Author Gabriel Kolko stated, “Morgan’s activities in 1895-1896 in selling US gold bonds in Europe were based on an alliance with the House of Rothschild.”

                                -----------------------------




(4) De joden waren zeer dominant tijdens de Russische Revolutie. ( Blog 86)


Bertrand Russell , in zijn autobiografie, pag. 354. Brief  25 juni 1920:

 “Bolshevism is a close tyrannical bureaucracy, with a spy system more elaborate and terrible than the Tsar's, and an aristocracy as insolent and unfeeling, composed of Americanised Jews. No vestige of liberty remains, in thought or speech or action.”

Vertaling:
Het bolsjewisme is een gesloten bureaucratische organisatie die tirannie uitoefent, met een spionage en verklikker-systeem  dat uitgebreider en vreselijker is dan ten tijde van de Tsaar. De leiders zijn onbeschaamd en gevoelloos en het zijn joden die in Amerika gewoond hebben. Er is geen spoor meer te vinden van vrijheid, niet in gedachte, in spraak en niet in daad.   


(5) Ambassadeur Oudendyke en Winston Churchill over de joodse Russische Revolutie: 


 Mr. Oudendyke, the Representative of the Netherlands Government in St. Petersburg in charge of British interests after the liquidation of the British Embassy by the Bolsheviks sent in a report to Mr. Balfour.
Oudendyke:
"I consider that the immediate suppression of Bolshevism is the greatest issue now before the world, not even excluding the war which is still raging, and unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to spread in one form or another over Europe, and the whole world, as it is organised and worked by Jews, who have no nationality, and whose one object is to destroy for their own ends the existing order of things. . ." (British Government White Paper, April, 1919 - Russia No.1) (Hoofdstuk 1. White Paper.)

Churchill:
"It may well be that this same astounding race may at the present time be in the actual process of providing another system of morals and philosophy, as malevolent as Christianity was benevolent, which if not arrested, would shatter irretrievably all that Christianity has rendered possible. . . this movement among the Jews is not new. . . it has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." (Winston Churchill. Illustrated Sunday Herald. Feb. 8th, 1920) 




(6)  Sommige Joden erkennen de extreme rol van de joden in de Russische Revolutie.


Op pag. 183 van Yuri Slezkine lezen we: 

"A few Russian Jewish intellectuals did plead guilty. 
 In a 1923 colection published in Berlin, "Russia and the Jews" they called on 'the jews of all countries' to resist Bolsehvism and to admit 'the bitter sin' of jewish complicity in its crimes. In the words of I. M. Bickerman, "It goes without saying that not all Jews are Bolsheviksm, and not all Bolsheviks are Jews, but what is equally obvious is the disproportionate and immeasurable fervent jewish participation in the torment of half dead Russia by the Bolsheviks."
It is true that the jews suffered immeasurably from the pogroms,  but was not the revolution 'a universal pogrom' ?  "Or is condemning a whole social class to extermination... a revolution, and killing and robbing Jews a pogrom ?
Why such honour for Marx and his followers ? And why the continued claim that evil 'always comes from the others and is always directed at us ?"




(7) Hoe dachten de joodse communisten zelf over hun wandaden?

Een van hen was Lev Kopelev, die later schrijver zou worden.

In Yuri Slezkine’s boek op pag 230 lezen we:

In het begin overwonnen ze de zalvend sprekende winkelier, dwongen ze de marskramer om te veranderen, zuiverden de corrupte figuren weg en liquideerden de koelakken als een klasse.


Het was een tijd om sterk en vastberaden te zijn :  volgens Kopelev - die deel nam aan het in beslag nemen van de bezittingen van  boeren in de Ukraïne, die de hongersnood mee maakte die daar op volgde, en vele jaren later probeerde te reconstrueren hoe hij zich destijds voelde :


”Je moet je niet overgeven aan verlammend medelijden.
Wij zijn de werktuigen, de agenten van iets dat historisch nu eenmaal moet gebeuren. 
Wij volvoeren onze revolutionaire plicht.  
Wij vorderen graan voor ons socialistisch vaderland.  Voor het Vijf Jaren Plan. “  


Kopelev wist waarover hij sprak. 
“Ik zag vrouwen en kinderen met bolle hongerbuiken, die blauw kleurden, met lege levbenloze ogen. En lijken……. Ik zag dat alles en werd niet gek en pleegde geen zelfmoord.... ( Uit Moynihan 1994).


Kopelev in zijn memoires: 
‘Wij waren strijders op een onzichtbaar front, vechtend tegen kulak-sabotage om het graan dat nodig was voor het land volgens het Vijf Jaren Plan.”
Hij deed meerdere malen per dag toespraken tot van honger stervende boeren, en vertelde hen “hoe veel harder de staat het graan nodig had dan zij. De boeren antwoordden meestal in de trant van “Hak mijn kop er maar af”, ze hadden niets meer om te geven.
 ( Kopelev memoires: The education of a true believer, 1980. Pags. 226-231)


NB: een kulak was soms niet meer dan een keuterboertje met 1 koe !
Het zijn deze toestanden waarvan Kopelev dus zei:  ‘Daar moet je niet semntimenteel over gaan doen. Dat is nu eenmaal noodzakelijk.’ (Holomodor fotos)
Ter vergelijk: (Gaza) (Deir Yassin

Ondertussen in …….. Moscow:
Waar de elite joden rijkelijk leefde, Universiteiten bezochten, de classieke 19e eeuwse litteratuur lazen, hun zomers in de dacha’s doorbrachten of aan de kust van de Zwarte Zee op manieren die deden denken aan die 19e eeuwse romans. Vaak hadden ze boerenmeisjes als kindermeisje gehad.  ( Slezkine pag 231.)




8a. Norman Cantor: de joden speelden een grote rol in Rusland. Het was een soort wraak voor de pogroms uit het verleden. 


In  The Jewish Experience, (1996) schrijft de joodse schrijver Norman Cantor op pag 364.:

The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath represented, from one perspective, Jewish revenge. . . .  During the heyday of the Cold War, American Jewish publicists spent a lot of time denying that—as 1930s anti-Semites claimed—Jews played a disproportionately important role in Soviet and world Communism.  The truth is until the early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing to be ashamed of.  In time Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish Communists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere.  It was a species of striking back .
                                     ----------------------------------------------------

(8) De grote invloed van de joden, volgens Benjamin Disraeli. ( Samenvatting Myers)


Te lezen in 'Coningsby", 1844.  pag. 201: 


"You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate. The first Jesuits were Jews; that mysterious Russian diplomacy which so alarms western Europe is organised and principally carried on by Jews; that mighty revolution which is at this momentpreparing in Germany, and which will be, in fact, a second and greater Reformation, and of which so little is as yet known in England, is entirely developing under the auspices of Jews, who almost monopolise the professorial chairs of Germany."

(9) De grote invloed van joden op de revoluties in diverse steden in Europa in 1848: 


Te lezen in 'Lord Bentick' van Benjamin Disraeli,  1852. ( uit Myers


pag 324: "An insurrection takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion and property. Destruction of the Semitic principle, extirpation of the Jewish religion, whether in the mosaic or in the christian form, the natural equality of man and the abrogation of property, are proclaimed bythe secret societies who form provisional governments, and men of Jewish race are found at the head of every one of them. The people of God co-operate with atheists; the most skilful accumulators of property ally themselves with communists; the peculiar and chosen race touch the hand of all the scum and low castes of Europe! And all this because they wish to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them even its name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure."


 "When the secret societies, in February 1848, surprised Europe, they were themselves surprised by the unexpected opportunity, and so little capable were they of seizing the occasion, that had it not been for the Jews, who of late years unfortunately have been connecting themselves with these unhallowed associations, imbecile as were the governments the uncalled-for outbreak would not have ravaged Europe. But the fiery energy and the teeming resources of the children of Israel maintained for a long time the unnecessary and useless struggle. If the reader throws over the provisional governments of Germany, and Italy, and even of France, formed at that period, he will recognise everywhere the Jewish element."

(10) VS hulp aan Israel: 6 miljard $ per jaar. 


Uit de video: '  Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land: Media & the Israel-Palestine Conflict' op 53 minuut: 
Amerika geeft 6 miljard $ hulp per jaar aan Israel:  
3 miljard  directe hulp en 3 miljard indirecte hulpt. De helft betreft militaire hulp. (Aan het 4e sterkste leger ter wereld.)  
Bovenop deze 6 miljard $ worden er nog gratis fighter planes en helicopters aan Israel gegeven. 

(11) Ostrovsky over de techniek van het bashen. 
Citaat van Voctor Ostrovski ( oud lid van de Mossad)  over het bashen van Saddam, waardoor hij een demon werd en kapot kon worden gemaakt:   ( Myers)

Ephraim had spelled it all out for me and confirmed some of the information I'd already known. He then went on. "After the bombing of Libya, our friend Qadhafi is sure to stay out of the picture for some time. Iraq and Saddam Hussein are the next target. We're starting now to build him up as the big villain. It will take some time, but in the end, there's no doubt it'll work."


12 The Vinyard Saker.
I don't mind bias, partisanship or engagement. But I *DO* resent falsehood. I guess I would say that everybody is entitled to his/her opinions, but not to his/her facts. Facts, I think, are axiomatically non-partisan, non-biased. They simply are, or are not.


13  The Vinyard Saker.
I need to caution you all here: not only is the corporate Ziomedia totally and absolutely unreliable, most reporters are lazy at best and pathological liars at worst; they might show you 3 year old military training footage and call it "Gadaffi forces murdering peaceful civilians".  Then, in a situation of de-facto civil war, false flag operations are inevitable.  Again, in Bosnia, there were so many totally fabricated stories (like the Serbian concentration camps in Bosnia) and false flags attacks (for example in infamous "Markale massacre") which the corporate Ziomedia swallowed without any critical investigation that we should expect more (other examples of such propaganda are the "Timisoara massacre" in Romania, the "baby-incubator atrocity" in Kuwait or the "Racak massacre" in Kosovo).


14.  Controle door de media.( Houcke

In 1933, het jaar dat Hitler democratisch aan de macht kwam, schreef de gezaghebbende Amerikaanse hoogleraar Harold Lasswell in de Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences dat aangezien de 'masses are still captive to ignorance and superstition' de komst van de democratie 'compelled the development of a whole new technique of control, largely through propaganda.' Want, zo stelt Lasswell, propaganda is 'the one means of mass mobilisation which is cheaper than violence, bribery or other possible control techniques.' 

15. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn ( Harvard
Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and judiciary. One would like to ask: by whom has it been elected and to whom is it responsible?
— Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn,  at Harvard, 8 juni 1978. 

16. Oscar Callaway (Callaway
“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations got together twelve men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select from the most influential papers in the United States in sufficient numbers of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States.
These twelve men worked the problem out by selecting 179 newspapers and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country.  They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of twenty-five of the greatest newspapers.  The twenty-five papers where agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached, the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; and editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.
“The contract is in existence at the present time and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations as to the present condition of the United States being attacked by foreign foes.
“The policy also included the suppression of everything in opposition to the wishes of the interests served.  The effectiveness of this scheme has been conclusively demonstrated by the character of the stuff carried in the daily press throughout the country since March 1913.
“They have resorted to anything necessary to commercialize public sentiment and sandbag the national Congress into making extravagant and wasteful appropriations for the army and navy under the false pretense that it was necessary.  Their stock argument is ‘patriotism.’  They are playing on every prejudice and passion of the American people.”

17. Bertrand Russell. ( Russell
"There is no nonsense so arrant (enorm) that it cannot be made the creed of the vast majority by adequate governmental action."
Ofwel: 
The Masters of Discourse kunnen het volk de meest verregaande onzin doen geloven. 

18. In communistisch Rusland werden de kerken verbrand, maar niet de synagogen.

Edwin Schoonmaker, Democracy and World Dominion, 1939,  pp. 211-12 :
Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write:  “According to such information as the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands—of the Greek Catholic churches. . . .” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, page 12.)   Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people,” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia. 

19. De joden hadden 300 jaar enorm veel macht in Polen, tijdens het Arendar systeem. Een stukje verborgen gehouden geschiedenis.

Fernand Braudel: ( in La Mediterrannée.. pag 137) : In Poland, which burst suddenly into modernity at the beginning of the fifteenth century, there is a growing jewish ascendance, the result of numbers, and almost a jewish nation and state….  
( Zie : Hveede = tarwe , rug = rogge : http://www.soundtoll.nl/public/)

80% van de joodse gezinshoofden was Arendar. ( Hij leasde een onderneming van 'de staat'.) 
Behalve joden waren er bijna geen ondernemers. Dat blijkt uit het feit dat de woorden jood en Arendar als synoniem werden gezien. ( Weiser
Zelfs de rechtspraak was uitbesteed aan de joden. 

De situatie voor de Poolse bevolking was vreselijk. Dat blijkt o.a. uit citaten van Graetz. ( Lysson

20. Professor Quigley had very good inside information about 'The Banks' and said their goal was
 'to controle the world': 

 "The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.

Pag 323 in:  Carroll Quigley (1966). Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time
New York: Macmillan.

21.  God tells the Jews that they should conquer the world,

                        and that he will help them with it. 


Psalm 2:8-9 (. . . I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. . . . Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel”)

Psalm 21:8-10 (“[T]hy right hand shall find out those that hate thee.  Thou shalt make them as a fiery oven in the time of thine anger: the Lord shall swallow them up. . .”);

Psalm 79:6-7 (“Pour out thy wrath upon the heathen. . . [f]or they have devoured Jacob [i.e., Israel], and laid waste his dwelling place”);

Psalm 149:7-8; Isaiah 45:14 (“Thus saith the Lord, . . . in chains. . . they shall fall down unto [Israel]. . .”);

Isaiah 60:12 (“. . .[T]he nation and kingdom that will not serve [Israel] shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted” );

Isaiah 61:5-6 (“. . .[S]trangers shall stand and feed your flocks. . . : [Y]e shall eat the riches of the Gentiles. . .”);

Jeremiah 30:10-11 and 46:28 (“Fear thou not, O Jacob [i.e., Israel], my servant, saith the Lord: . . . for I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee. .

Numbers 25:6-13 (wherein God commends Phineas for his initia-tive in running a javelin through both parties to a marriage of Jew and gentile),
Deuteronomy 25:17-19 (“[T]hou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget [to do] it”). 

22. American Enterprise Institute admits the problem with Iran is not that it would use nukes.  (See: Jewish Journal.com )

If Israels determination to stop Iran is not about defending Israel from an “existential threat,” what is it truly about?
Fortunately, [the AEI ] does not leave us guessing. It is about preserving the regional balance of power, which means ensuring that Israel remains the region’s military powerhouse, with Saudi Arabia playing a supporting role. That requires overthrowing the Iranian regime and replacing it with one that will do our bidding (like the Shah) and will not, in any way, prevent Israel from operating with a free reign throughout the region.



23  Het ESM  ( Europese Strabiliteits Mechanisme) en Protocol 7. 

Protocol 7.
Mijn korte en duidelijke vertaling zou zijn:

Als een staat in financiele problemen komt, is ze reddeloos verloren: ze is dan in onze macht.  Wij controleren ‘Het Geld’ , en dat zal ze van ons moeten aannemen, want  anders gaat ze helemaal naar de bodem. 


De Nederlandse vertaling uit 1933:
7..Of een staat zich nu al uitput onder de werking van zijn eigen schokken of dat zijn binnenlandse twisten hem aan vreemde vijanden overleveren, in ieder geval kan hij als reddeloos verloren worden beschouwd: hij is in onze macht. De heerschappij van het kapitaal dat geheel in onze handen is, komt hem dan voor als een reddingsanker waaraan hij zich goedschiks of kwaadschiks moet vastklampen, wil hij niet ten onder gaan.

De Marsden vertaling :

7. Whether a State exhausts itself of its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes - in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not - it goes to the bottom.

Mijn  bijna letterlijke vertaling naar hedendaags taalgebruik:
Of een staat nu wordt uitgeput door gewone interne problemen danwel dat een staat als gevolg van binnenlandse  strijd aan kwaadwillende buitenlandse machten wordt overgeleverd, de staat is in elk geval reddeloos verloren: ze is dan in onze macht.  De beheersers van ‘Het Geld’ - dat geheel in onze handen is-  reiken de staat een helpende hand die ze, of ze wil of niet, zal moeten grijpen, als ze niet ten onder wil gaan.  

24.

De joodse Leonard Schapiro wordt geciteerd in 'The Jewish Century'( de 'National Jewish Book award 2005' winner) van Yuri Slezkine ( half joods)  die op zijn beurt Lev Kopolev ( joods) citeert. 
Volgens Schapiro zijn veel Russen door joodse Cheka agenten vermoord: 
"Anyone who had the misfortune to fall in the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with and possibly shot by a Jewish investigator" ( Slezkine 2004 pag 177.)

No comments:

Post a Comment