Tuesday, February 07, 2012

195. Syria: Who is who... What happens there?

This blog: http://tiny.cc/1wndv   Mixed: English and Dutch.


The Report of the 160 arab monitors confirmed what the well informed already knew: Violence in Syria comes from outside Syria, and serves a foreign agenda. That's why this Report was never published in The West.  Pepe Escobar explains, and all below you find the Report. 


See also theTestimony from Syria on youtube by a Flemish priest: blog 197.


Summary in Dutch.
Ik heb de indruk dat de hele arabische wereld met opzet in chaos wordt gestort. 
Cui bono? Israel heeft op allerlei manieren dit verlangen geuit, dus de kans is aanzienlijk dat zij er achter zitten. 
(Yinon) ( ACB) (Hart)
Een recent artikel van Pepe Escobar in Asiatimes bevestigt in elk geval dat de opstand door buitenlandse belangen wordt opgedreven. (Artikel: zie onder) 
In de westerse Media horen we steeds dat Assad de gruweldaden laat gebeuren en dat zelfs de Arabische landen een eind aan dat bewind wensen. Maar er was een team van 160 waarnemers en zij hebben een raport uitgebracht dat een ander beeld schetst:
Pepe Escobar: " The report is adamant. There was no organized, lethal repression by the Syrian government against peaceful protesters. Instead, the report points to shady armed gangs as responsible for hundreds of deaths among Syrian civilians, and over one thousand among the Syrian army, using lethal tactics such as bombing of civilian buses, bombing of trains carrying diesel oil, bombing of police buses and bombing of bridges and pipelines."


Het ware geweld wordt dus geïnitieerd door strijders van onduidelijk signatuur die beide partijen op grove wijze aanvallen, om zodoende de strijd op gang te houden. 
            In het Westen wordt deze info verborgen gehouden, maar in de BRICS landen is dit algemeen bekend.
            Dezelfde berichten kwamen destijds van reporters in Libië !  
            Enorme gruweldaden, gepleegd tegen beide partijen, door onbekende daders. 


Verder legt Escobar uit: Wie is Wie...
De Arabische Liga is in feite een club die wordt beheerst door twee koningshuizen in de Regio: Qatar en het Huis Saoed. Deze heersers ruilen de olie van hun land voor steun van Amerika aan hun bewind. 
Ze doen dus alles wat Amerika ( lees Israel) wil. 


De National Council ( een soort regering in ballingschap) verblijft niet in een of ander arabisch land of in een neutraal land, maar in twee Nato landen: Frankrijk en Turkije. Vreemd voor een organisatie die flink wat Muslim Brotherhood bloed bevat en ferm gesteund wordt door SA en Qatar.


Het Vrije Syrische Leger bevat dus niet alleen oprechte Syriërs die Assad beu zijn, maar ook flink wat 'sympathysanten' of huurlingen of misdadigers die van buiten komen. Gesteund door SA (en dus indirect door Amerika en Israel....  J. Verheul.)
                              ----------------------------------------------------




Here is Escobars original publication.
I prefer the better readable copy of another blogger: 

MONDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2012


Exposed: The Arab Agenda in Syria


Here's a crash course on the "democratic" machinations of the Arab League - rather the GCC League, as real power in this pan-Arab organization is wielded by two of the six Persian Gulf monarchies composing the Gulf Cooperation Council, also known as Gulf Counter-revolution Club; Qatar and the House of Saud.

Essentially, the GCC created an Arab League group to monitor what's going on in Syria. The Syrian National Council - based in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries Turkey and France - enthusiastically supported it. It's telling that Syria's neighbor Lebanon did not.

When the over 160 monitors, after one month of enquiries, issued their report ... surprise! The report did not follow the official GCC line - which is that the "evil" Bashar al-Assad government is indiscriminately, and unilaterally, killing its own people, and so regime change is in order.

The Arab League's Ministerial Committee had approved the report, with four votes in favor (Algeria, Egypt, Sudan and GCC member Oman) and only one against; guess who, Qatar - which is now presiding the Arab League because the emirate bought their (rotating) turn from the Palestinian Authority.

So the report was either ignored (by Western corporate media) or mercilessly destroyed - by Arab media, virtually all of it financed by either the House of Saud or Qatar. It was not even discussed - because it was prevented by the GCC from being translated from Arabic into English and published in the Arab League's website.

Until it was leaked. Here it is : 


THE REPORT OF THE ARAB LEAGUE OBSERVER MISSION.



The report is adamant. 
There was no organized, lethal repression by the Syrian government against peaceful protesters. Instead, the report points to shady armed gangs as responsible for hundreds of deaths among Syrian civilians, and over one thousand among the Syrian army, using lethal tactics such as bombing of civilian buses, bombing of trains carrying diesel oil, bombing of police buses and bombing of bridges and pipelines.

Once again, the official NATOGCC version of Syria is of a popular uprising smashed by bullets and tanks. Instead, BRICS members Russia and China, and large swathes of the developing world see it as the Syrian government fighting heavily armed foreign mercenaries. The report largely confirms these suspicions.

The Syrian National Council is essentially a Muslim Brotherhood outfit affiliated with both the House of Saud and Qatar - with an uneasy Israel quietly supporting it in the background. Legitimacy is not exactly its cup of green tea. As for the Free Syrian Army, it does have its defectors, and well-meaning opponents of the Assad regime, but most of all is infested with these foreign mercenaries weaponized by the GCC, especially Salafist gangs.

Still NATOGCC, blocked from applying in Syria its one-size-fits-all model of promoting "democracy" by bombing a country and getting rid of the proverbial evil dictator, won't be deterred. GCC leaders House of Saud and Qatar bluntly dismissed their own report and went straight to the meat of the matter; impose a NATOGCC regime change via the UN Security Council.

So the current "Arab-led drive to secure a peaceful end to the 10-month crackdown" in Syria at the UN is no less than a crude regime change drive. Usual suspects Washington, London and Paris have been forced to fall over themselves to assure the real international community this is not another mandate for NATO bombing - a la Libya. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton described it as "a path for a political transition that would preserve Syria's unity and institutions".

But BRICS members Russia and China see it for what it is. Another BRICS member - India - alongside Pakistan and South Africa, have all raised serious objections to the NATOGCC-peddled draft UN resolution.

There won't be another Libya-style no fly zone; after all the Assad regime is not exactly deploying Migs against civilians. A UN regime change resolution will be blocked - again - by Russia and China. Even NATOGCC is in disarray, as each block of players - Washington, Ankara, and the House of Saud-Doha duo - has a different long-term geopolitical agenda. Not to mention crucial Syrian neighbor and trading partner Iraq; Baghdad is on the record against any regime change scheme.

So here's a suggestion to the House of Saud and Qatar; since you're so seduced by the prospect of "democracy" in Syria, why don't you use all your American weaponry and invade in the dead of night - like you did to Bahrain - and execute regime change by yourselves?

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War(Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His most recent is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).
==================================================================

No comments:

Post a Comment