He says: Ten days after 911 I was at the Pentagon and one general took me apart and said: "They are going to invade Irak ! "
A few weeks later I saw the same general and asked him: "How about Irak ?"
He replied: "Its even worse. They plan to invade seven countries in the next 5 years:
Irak, Syria, Libanon, Lybia, Somalia, Sudan and Iran."
Clark asked: "But why ?"
The general answered: "I have no idea ! I guess because they have an army that could do it, and that makes them do it."
The video is a little annoying, because the person who put it on the internet repeats several scenes a few times.
The video concludes with Clark 'admitting' that is must have to do with oil. That must be the reason.
Let me make a few conclusions from this video.
- The americans were planning to invade Irak almost immediately after 911. Even before 911 there were people like Wolfowitz and other Neocons who pleaded for an invasion, but without 911 there was no way they could get Congress to agree with it.
- Clark shows us that already at that time there was a strong lobby in the government to invade Libya. The 'humanitary necessity' was just a lie: That Ghadaffi killed 6000 civilians with bombardments from the air is never corroborated. ( Its like the incubator babies and the WMD's: all lies.)
- Clark says he sees no reason for these invasions, and in the end he can imagine only one reason: it must be to get the oil !
This is not very plausible. For several reasons:
1. The oil people were not the ones to applaud the Iraq invasion. They prefer quietness and a good relation with the arabs.
2. As it turned out, a lot of the Iraqi oil was sold to the Chinese.
3. Most important: Why would you invade a country for the oil if it has no oil, like Libanon, or if it has very little oil like Syria or Somalia. Or if you have almost conquered the oil in a very different and cheap way, like the South Sudan oil. ( Oil reserves ) ( Sudan KHS )
So, if not for the oil, WHY did these Neocons plan to invade these 7 muslim countries ?
For humanitary reasons? To bring democracy ?
But there are so many countries in the world with a bad human-rights record and little democracy, and some even have a lot of oil like Nigeria and Kazachstan.
Why these seven ?
And if it were to bring democracy ànd get the oil: why not invade Saudi Arabia, or Yemen or Bahrain ?
We have to search for a better answer, I am afraid.
I hope you readers will comment and give your suggestions.
My answer is this:
Most Neocons are jewish and have alsoan Israeli passport.
They feel alot cloeser to Israel than to the US.
Their goal is: Eretz Israel: a much larger Israel, as it is promised in the Torah.
I think this loyalty or even fanatism does not at all mean that they are religious jews.
For this to happen, a Greater Israel, an awful lot of muslims have to disappear.
That can never be done in a world with strong arab-muslim countries.
It can never be done in a world where islam is considered a respectable religion.
What else could be the motivation of these Neocons?
There are several answers, and all of them are valid for some of the people involved.
= There is the drive to rule the world. Many people or nations have this, but the jews high up in the banking world know and feel that it is within their reach. They let the 2008 crisis happen, and possibly provoked it on purpose. At least many countries are now in the power of the banks, and EU countries are getting closer and closer to give up sovereignty.( Citation 20 )
= There is the agreement that God made with his chosen people:
Psalm 2:8-9 (“. . . I shall give thee the heathen for thine inheritance. . . . Thou shalt break them with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them in pieces like a potter’s vessel”)
Psalm 21:8-10 (“[T]hy right hand shall find out those that hate thee. Thou shalt make them as a fiery oven in the time of thine anger: the Lord shall swallow them up. . .”);
Psalm 79:6-7 (“Pour out thy wrath upon the heathen. . . [f]or they have devoured Jacob [i.e., Israel], and laid waste his dwelling place”);
Psalm 149:7-8; Isaiah 45:14 (“Thus saith the Lord, . . . in chains. . . they shall fall down unto [Israel]. . .”);
Isaiah 60:12 (“. . .[T]he nation and kingdom that will not serve [Israel] shall perish; yea, those nations shall be utterly wasted” );
Isaiah 61:5-6 (“. . .[S]trangers shall stand and feed your flocks. . . : [Y]e shall eat the riches of the Gentiles. . .”);
Jeremiah 30:10-11 and 46:28 (“Fear thou not, O Jacob [i.e., Israel], my servant, saith the Lord: . . . for I will make a full end of all the nations whither I have driven thee: but I will not make a full end of thee. .
Numbers 25:6-13 (wherein God commends Phineas for his initia-tive in running a javelin through both parties to a marriage of Jew and gentile),
Deuteronomy 25:17-19 (“[T]hou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven; thou shalt not forget [to do] it”).
This goes together with a mixture of 'revenge on the world' for the many times in history that jews were discriminated against, or thrown out, or molested or even killed.
This jewish suffering is an important part of jewish upbringing.
Or should I say: the idea that jews are victims and that revenge is justified, is an important part.
From all this it is plausible that Jews see it as an opportunity, a duty and a justified revenge to demolish arab societies and western societies, in order to become the real rulers of the world.
Tikun Olam is maybe the conscious motivation.
These Neocons are inspired by Leo Strauss. He is pro democracy, but not a real democracy: the ones in power may deceit their peoples. And only the inner circles know what the real agenda is. Are Rumsfeld and Cheney part of the inner circle? Or is that just for jews ?
(*) Note: Clark wrote about the same facts in a 2003 book, so the information from Clark is not dependent on this video.