Canadian author Martinez gives a fine survey of the Real History as I see it.
These are the influential people behind the screens who decide what does hapopen and what does not happen, and what is perceived to have happened.
A Century of Deceit: World
Wars and Zionist Militarism
By Brandon Martinez
April 08, 2014 "ICH" - "Press TV" - - Some studies estimate that close to 1.5 million Iraqis have lost their lives as a result of the brutal American invasion and occupation of their country in 2003. Millions more Iraqis have become refugees and orphans with no future prospects for prosperity, sanctity or stability.
By Brandon Martinez
April 08, 2014 "ICH" - "Press TV" - - Some studies estimate that close to 1.5 million Iraqis have lost their lives as a result of the brutal American invasion and occupation of their country in 2003. Millions more Iraqis have become refugees and orphans with no future prospects for prosperity, sanctity or stability.
Most of the critical
infrastructure of the country was bombed into rubble and dust. American
depleted uranium weapons have caused cancer rates in some Iraqi cities to
skyrocket, permanently destroying the genes of future generations of Iraqis who
are being born with horrific birth defects and diseases.
The culprits responsible for
this genocidal campaign to subdue and enslave the Iraqi people are not the CEOs
of American oil companies as some disingenuous commentators on the Left have
claimed. President George W. Bush’s foreign policy in the Middle East was not
his own nor that of the oil lobby, but was the brainchild of the
neoconservative conspirators behind the Project for the New American Century
(PNAC), the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), the
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and other Zionist-oriented think tanks that
dominated the Washington Beltway.
Three of Bush’s principal
foreign policy advisors who are widely recognized as the prime movers behind
the war in Iraq were neocon ideologues Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and Paul
Wolfowitz, all of whom have well-documented histories of Israeli partisanship.
Perle and Wolfowitz, for instance, were both investigated by the FBI in the
1980s for passing classified defence documents to Israel. Perle was once
an employee of the Israeli weapons firm Soltam. Writers for the New York
Times described Wolfowitz as one of Israel’s “staunchest allies” in the Bush
administration and revealed that Wolfowitz “is friendly with Israel’s generals
and diplomats” and that he is “something of a hero to the heavily Jewish
neoconservative movement.” Feith once ran a law firm in Israel and
received an award from the Zionist Organization of America for his “services to
Israel and the Jewish people.” The New Yorker revealed that Feith even
has a portrait of Zionism’s founder Theodore Herzl hanging on the wall of his
home library. It was Feith and his neocon Zionist colleague Abram Shulsky
who oversaw the secretive “Office of Special Plans” in the Pentagon where all
of the lies about Iraq’s “weapons of mass destruction” were conceived and
disseminated.
These Israeli militarists,
masquerading as American thinkers, left behind a paper trail that unveiled
their true objectives. In 1996, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith and David Wurmser
– all future Bush administration officials -- authored a strategy paper for
Benjamin Netanyahu’s Israeli Likud regime entitled “A Clean Break: A New
Strategy for Securing the Realm.” In the paper, these Zionist hawks
advocated an aggressive Israeli foreign policy, calling for the removal of all
of Israel’s possible military competitors in the region through force. They
spoke of “weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria” and of removing
Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, calling it an “important Israeli strategic
objective.” Also on their hit list was Iran, whose influence in the region they
hoped to neutralize as well. By eliminating Israel’s external enemies the
Zionist neocons were in turn endeavoring to subdue Israel’s internal foes, the
indigenous Arab Palestinians who continue to resist Israeli occupation and
apartheid.
Meyrav Wurmser, the wife of
neocon David Wurmser, confessed that most of the leading neocons are pro-Israel
Jews. Gal Beckerman, a writer for the Jewish Forward newspaper, admitted
that the ideology of neoconservatism itself was the brainchild of chauvinistic
Jewish intellectuals such as Leo Strauss, Irving Kristol and Albert
Wohlstetter. “If there is an intellectual movement in America to whose
invention Jews can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it,” Beckerman
wrote. Prominent Israeli journalist Ari Shavit said the Iraq war was
engineered by a cabal of 25 mostly Jewish neoconservative intellectuals.
Famed American-Jewish journalist Carl Bernstein expressed the same view on
MSNBC. The Iraq war was launched on a phony pretext by Bush, Cheney and “the
Jewish neocons who wanted to remake the world,” Bernstein opined, much to the
chagrin of the pro-Zionist host.
The engine driving the
Zionist-led neoconservative war machine is “holocaust” mythology. “For those of
us who are involved in foreign and defense policy today of my generation,”
explained Richard Perle in a BBC interview, “the defining moment of our history
was certainly the holocaust.” Douglas Feith often invokes the holocaust
to justify his militarism. In a New Yorker profile, Feith asked, “What’s the
answer to the Holocaust?” He answered his own question by suggesting that it is
not surprising that this alleged event has caused so many Jews to become
militant neocons dedicated to aggressive, unyielding warfare against all those
who pose a “threat” to Jews and their interests. In a New York Times
profile, Paul Wolfowitz spoke of the holocaust as having a profound impact on
his worldview. Another neocon ringleader, Michael Ledeen, revealed his
obsession with the subject in an article he authored entitled “The New
Holocaust.” Political analyst Kevin Barrett observed that the Israelis
and their Jewish neocon patrons in Washington “are fanatical extremists who
feel that they are being persecuted everywhere they go and that they have to be
extremely harsh, unyielding and aggressive, as well as deceptive and violent
with the world” in order to ensure their survival. Somehow it doesn’t
dawn on them that maybe it is their unscrupulous behaviour that is the cause of
hostility towards them in the first place. Obviously introspection is not
exactly a Zionist virtue.
The Zionists’ militarist
mindset is evidently motivated by the ethnocentric myths of Jewish victimhood.
World-conquering Neocon-Zionist belligerence is driven in large part by the
religious adherence to the official propaganda of the victors of World War II.
Elite Jews played an important role in bringing about the Second World War as
the final phase of their plan to establish the state of Israel. The First World
War accomplished several things for the Zionists: it freed up Palestine from
Ottoman control (the Ottomans previously rejected Zionist offers to purchase
Palestine), it fractured the big empires of Europe who could then be
manipulated into future conflicts, and lastly it delivered Russia to the
Bolsheviks, a majority of whom were Jewish chauvinists hell-bent on the
subjugation of that Christian Empire. With Russia now in the hands of Jewish
communist extremists and Palestine falling under British dominion, the Zionist
plan for Israel was well on its way.
“It has been repeatedly
acknowledged by British Statesmen,” wrote Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann in a
1941 letter to British leader Winston Churchill, “that it was the Jews who, in
the last [world] war, effectively helped to tip the scales in America in favour
of Great Britain. They are keen to do it - and may do it - again.” Wiezmann
went on to ask for British assistance in the formation of a “Jewish fighting
force” that would be used to ethnically cleanse Palestine of its Arab
population. Wiezmann promised Churchill that if the British would help create a
Jewish militia to conquer Palestine, he would do his utmost to mobilize
American Jewry to exert their influence to draw America into the Second World
War on Britain’s side, as they did in the first great war.
Benjamin Freedman, a former
top-level Zionist, exposed the machinations of his brethren relating to the First
and Second World Wars and the Zionist conquest of Palestine. In a 1961 speech
at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., Freedman explained that the United
States was “suckered into the [first world] war merely so that the Zionists of
the world could obtain Palestine.” Freedman described how Zionist Jews made a
secretive deal with the British leadership during World War I promising to
bring America into the war in exchange for Palestine. The result of this
agreement was the “Balfour Declaration” of 1917, a British government decree
that promised to make Palestine into a national homeland for the Jews.
Freedman stressed the absurdity that Britain “should offer [Palestine] as coin
of the realm to pay the Zionists for bringing the United States into the war.”
The Zionists, said Freedman, “have complete control of our government. … The
Zionists and their co-religionists rule this United States as though they were
the absolute monarchs of this country.”
In a December 1919 speech in
Jerusalem, Chaim Wiezmann boasted about securing the Balfour Declaration from
the British government through “persistent propaganda, through unceasing
demonstration of the life force of our people.” “We told the responsible
authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or
not,” Weizmann said. “You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it.
It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers
being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.” Threatening
the world into approving the creation of Israel was part and parcel of the
Zionist project from its inception.
In 1903 an early Zionist
leader named Max Nordau conspicuously predicted the outbreak of the First World
War, which lends credence to the suggestion that a hidden force of Jewish
Zionists, Freemasons and bankers are responsible for instigating the conflict
for their own purposes. “Let me tell you the following words as if I were
showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist
Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace
conference - where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be
created,” Nordau told his compatriots at the sixth Zionist Congress in Basel,
Switzerland, 11 years before the outbreak of the First World War and 14 years
before the British issued the “Balfour Declaration.”
Such predictive powers unveil
a plan that was consciously followed and executed during and after World War I.
The “peace conference” Nordau envisioned was the 1919 Paris Peace Conference,
which resulted in the Treaty of Versailles, a farce that unjustly punished
Germany for a war it did not start, thus laying the groundwork for the
inevitable outbreak of the Second World War. An international peacekeeping body
was established shortly after World War I known as the League of Nations. The
League put its stamp of approval on the British seizure of Palestine after the
war, an imperial land-grab that had no real legitimacy outside of the self-serving
declarations of the political elites, bankers and oligarchs who chaired the
League.
The League essentially
functioned as a tool of the financial elite and served the geopolitical
aspirations of the Zionists. “The League of Nations is a Jewish idea, and
Jerusalem some day will become the capital of the world’s peace,” proclaimed
Jewish leader Nahum Sokolow at a Zionist conference in Carlsbad, California, in
1922. “The League has recognized our rights to our ancient home,” he said. “We
Jews throughout the world will make the League’s struggle our own and will not
rest until there is ultimate victory.”
Even with Palestine now in the
palm of their hands, the Zionists still had a problem: convincing Europe’s Jews
to leave their lives of luxury and embrace Palestine as their new home. Such a
task proved difficult, with only a minority of European Jews strongly
identifying with Zionism at this time. This reality sheds a different light on
the rise of Adolf Hitler and National Socialism in Germany, which proved very
convenient from the Zionists’ perspective. While publicly professing scorn and
hatred of Nazism, Zionist Jews secretly initiated a deal with Hitler’s
government – the “Transfer Agreement” – which saw the transfer of tens of
thousands of German Jews and their assets to Palestine. Lasting from 1933
through 1941, the Nazi-Zionist pact proved crucial to the future establishment
of the Zionist state. The large amounts of capital and agricultural equipment
that was shipped into Palestine by way of this agreement substantially
contributed to the creation of Israel. “Through this pact, Hitler’s Third Reich
did more than any other government during the 1930s to support Jewish
development in Palestine,” opined historian Mark Weber in his article titled
“Zionism and the Third Reich.” “[D]uring the 1930s no nation did more to
substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler’s Germany,” says Weber.
Still, the Transfer Agreement
alone did not produce the amount of Jewish emigration necessary to form an
exclusivist Jewish ethno-state in Palestine, as the Zionists intended all
along. There simply were not enough Jews in Palestine that would be required to
replace the expelled Arabs and keep them at bay. Not only that, but there was
still not enough global support or sympathy for the creation of a state for
Jews. Since the dawn of Zionism in the late 1800s, Jewish-Zionist ideologues
had been ravenously promoting the story of “six million” persecuted and
oppressed Jews. “We Jews need a homeland of our own because we are persecuted
wherever we go” was the traditional Zionist argumentation. But the First World
War did not produce the circumstances needed to foist this propaganda on the
world. Jews were not singled out for persecution or mistreatment by any
belligerent in that war, which is why the Zionists, following the dictates of
their founder Theodore Herzl, deliberately aided and abetted Hitler’s forces to
corral their fellow Jews into ghettos and concentration camps during the Second
World War.
Herzl, in his diaries,
advocated making use of “anti-Semitism” to spur Jewish emigration to Palestine.
“It would be an excellent idea to call in respectable, accredited anti-Semites
as liquidators of [Jewish] property,” he wrote. “The anti-Semites will become
our most dependable friends, the anti-Semitic countries our allies. … I have
already told you that we want to let respectable anti-Semites participate in
our project, respecting their independence which is valuable to us—as a sort of
people's control authority.” Did Hitler not carry out Herzl’s exact
mandate? It must be pointed out that Hitler’s “final solution of the Jewish
question” was the same procedure outlined by Zionists decades earlier:
sequestering all Jews into a single state, isolated from other nations. “The final
solution of the Jewish question lies therefore in the establishment of the
Jewish State,” said the 1897 manifesto of a German-Zionist group. In an
1899 letter, Theodore Herzl asked the Russian Czar if he would hear out his
“Zionist plan for the final solution of the Jewish Question.” In 1936,
the Jewish nationalist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky laid out what the Zionist
plan would ultimately entail: “It is not our task to establish in Palestine a
home for selected people, not even a state for a small portion of our people.
The aim of our efforts is to organize a systematic massive Jewish evacuation
from all the countries in which they live.”
“The transfer of millions of
Jews to their homeland [Palestine] will save the European Jewry from
extermination,” declared Jabotinsky in 1940, adding, “Evacuation of the Jewish
masses is the only cure for the Jewish catastrophe.” The “extermination”
Jabotinsky spoke of was not happening, but that didn’t stop Zionist
propagandists from disseminating reckless atrocity stories of systematic
genocide in order to win the world over to the Zionist cause. Legends of human
soap, skin lampshades, shrunken heads, electric shock chambers, gas chambers
and other absurdities were trumpeted from the rooftops by Zionists and their controlled
press.
Jewish leaders made numerous
public pronouncements designed to provoke Hitler, hoping he would unleash his
fury upon Europe’s Jews, and with the help of Organized Zionism spur them to
make their way to Palestine. For instance, Organized Jewry made a declaration
of war against Germany in March 1933, before Hitler took any serious measures
restricting the rights of German Jews. “Judea Declares War on Germany: Jews of
All the World Unite in Action,” read the headline of the March 24, 1933, edition
of Britain’s Daily Express. The corresponding article declared a Jewish “holy
war against Germany.” “The Israeli people around the world,” the article
continued, “declare economic and financial war against Germany. Fourteen
million Jews stand together as one man, to declare war against Germany.”
A year later Jabotinsky made a similarly bellicose pronouncement, stating:
“For months now the struggle
against Germany is waged by each Jewish community, at each conference, in all
our syndicates, and by each Jew all over the world. There is reason to believe
that our part in this struggle has general value. We will trigger a spiritual
and material war of all the world against Germany's ambitions to become once
again a great nation, to recover lost territories and colonies. But our Jewish
interests demand the complete destruction of Germany.”
As the war drew near, Chaim
Weizmann did everything in his power to invite definite reprisals against Jews
from Hitler’s regime. In a 1939 letter to British leader Neville Chamberlain,
Weizmann declared that “the Jews stand by Great Britain and will fight on the
side of the democracies.” Weizmann and his Zionist colleagues made many
public statements to that effect, which Hitler referenced in a July 1942
speech. In 1941, an American Jew named Theodore Kaufman made an even more
brazen effort to deliberately provoke hostility towards Jews. He authored and
published a book advocating the genocide of the whole German people by way of a
forced sterilization program. Kaufman’s text, titled Germany Must Perish!,
outlined “a comprehensive plan for the extinction of the German nation and the
total eradication from the earth, of all her people.” A map illustrating
the possible territorial break-up of Germany and the “apportionment of her
lands” was also found in the book. “Germany must perish forever from this
earth!” Kaufman declared, calling for “a final solution” of German extinction.
Hitler’s propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels was well aware of Kaufman’s hateful
screed, and widely distributed it in Germany to bolster his case of a Jewish
conspiracy against his country.
Zionist leaders and activists
gave Hitler more than enough ammunition to justify interning Jews in camps as a
security threat to Germany. The American and Canadian governments imprisoned
Japanese, German and Italian citizens in camps during the war with a far weaker
rationale. Japanese, German and Italian citizens of the US and Canada had not
declared a “holy war” against their adopted countries, but were interned nonetheless.
It is difficult to escape the conclusion that these Zionist provocations were a
cleverly calculated ruse intended to create an atmosphere in Europe conducive
to the Zionist transfer plan. Without the uprooting process initiated by the
National Socialists and their Zionist assistants, it is unlikely that any large
amount of European Jews would have voluntarily left Europe for an uncertain
future in Palestine.
Some Jewish casualties in a
devastating war that took tens of millions of lives was inevitable and very
much desired by the Zionist leaders seeking a pretext to invade and conquer
Palestine for Jewish colonization. “There are 6,000,000 living, bleeding,
suffering arguments in favor of Zionism,” declared Rabbi Stephen S. Wise at a
meeting of Zionists in New York in 1900. In 1906, a German-Jewish
philanthropist named Dr. Paul Nathan publicized the notion that the Russian
government had initiated a policy of exterminating its Jews as a “solution” to
the “Jewish question” and that six million were in grave danger. Max
Nordau, the Zionist leader who predicted World War I, invoked the story of six
million persecuted Jews in 1899, 1911 and 1920. At a Zionist conference
in 1911, Nordau warned that it was only a matter of time before six million
Jews would be “annihilated” by European governments.
This familiar narrative was
repeatedly advanced a few dozen times before, during and after World War
I. A most interesting example is from October 1919 when the American
Hebrew publication carried an alarmist story headlined “The Crucifixion of Jews
Must Stop” which alleged that “six million Jewish men and women” were on the
brink of a “holocaust of human life.” A New York Times report from the
same year headlined “Ukrainian Jews Aim To Stop Pogroms” alleged that six
million Jews in the Ukraine and Poland were being targeted in pogroms and
massacres. Another report from 1921 titled “Begs America Save 6,000,000
In Russia,” also from the New York Times, said, “Russia’s 6,000,000 Jews are
facing extermination by massacre.”
As the Second World War
approached, Zionists amplified their atrocity propaganda. In 1936, Chaim
Weizmann told a British Commission that “six million Jews” in Europe had
“neither hope nor future save in the land of Israel.” In 1940, World Jewish
Congress chairman Nahum Goldmann proclaimed that if the German National
Socialists achieved victory in the war “6,000,000 Jews in Europe are doomed to
destruction.” Amazingly, Zionist newspapers betrayed the pre-meditated
and fraudulent nature of the six million myth by proclaiming precisely six
million Jewish victims six months before the end of the war.
Soviet-Jewish war propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg told his readers that “the world
now knows that Germany has killed six million Jews” in March of 1945, two
months before the end of hostilities and long before any accurate statistical
data of war casualties would become available. “At that time, no
demographic figures could have been available to [Ehrenburg],” writes German
Rudolf in the preface of The First Holocaust. “Just a year later,” Rudolf
continues, “British Historian David Irving emphasized that as early as June
1945, in other words immediately after the end of hostilities in Europe, some
Zionist leaders claimed to be able to provide the precise number of Jewish
victims - six million, of course - even though the chaos reigning in Europe at
that time rendered any demographic studies impossible.”
In an effort to whitewash
their own egregious war crimes, the Allied Powers went along with the Zionists’
pre-meditated fictional account of six million dead Jews. At the post-war
Nuremberg trials, an Allied-run kangaroo court staffed to the brim by Zionist
Jews and their Allied lackeys, the truth was buried underneath a tidal wave of
falsehoods. The Zionist motives for the war itself were purposefully obscured
and a cartoonish propaganda narrative of “Nazi evil” was foisted upon the world
to advance the victors’ post-war aims for Europe and accelerate the Zionists’
ambitions for a Jewish ethno-state in Palestine. American Senator Thomas Dodd,
who was a chief prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials in 1945, revealed in a
letter to his wife that the staff at Nuremberg was about 75 per cent Jewish.
“Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial -- for their
own sake,” Dodd wrote in the letter, adding, “For … the charge ‘a war for the
Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and
again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here [at Nuremberg]
will be cited as proof of this charge.”
When the Soviet Union and its
communist satellites in Eastern Europe collapsed in 1991, so did the myth of
the six million. The Soviet lie of four million deaths at Auschwitz – a
monstrous exaggeration accepted as ‘fact’ for decades -- was officially reduced
to around one million, but revisionist historians doubt even that figure.
Revisionist scholarship has determined that somewhere between 100-150 thousand
people perished in Auschwitz mainly as a result of disease and starvation, which
was not a deliberate act on the part of the Germans but rather the outcome of
Allied carpet-bombing of Germany’s infrastructure. For years Zionist
propagandists claimed several million Jews had been killed by the Germans at
the Mauthausen and Majdanek concentration camps, but recent official revisions
place the Jewish death totals there at 74,000 combined. Despite the vast
lowering of the death figures at many major camps, Zionists and those they have
convinced through incessant propaganda still repeat the erroneous six million
number as fact.
Jewish scholar Norman
Finkelstein outlined Zionist deceptions vis-à-vis the orthodox holocaust
narrative in his book The Holocaust Industry. Finkelstein observes that a
dogma has been fashioned around the “holocaust” by the Jewish-Zionist
establishment as a means of thought control. Shielding Israel from criticism
and rebuke, Finkelstein argues, is a primary motivation behind the ceaseless
promotion of holocaust mythology, in addition to Zionist shakedowns for reparations
money from Germany. This profitable industry is bolstered by the Hollywood
entertainment establishment which is “totally run by Jews” according to the
Jewish Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein. Not only does the
holocaust dogma provide Zionist Jews with psychological cover to commit heinous
crimes against the Palestinians and mask them under a façade of victimhood, but
it also acts as a perpetual pretext for wars that serve Israel’s interests,
such as the war in Iraq.
Gilad Sharon, the son of
Israeli war criminal politician Ariel Sharon, vividly unveiled the bloodthirsty
and bellicose nature of Zionism in a 2012 op-ed for the Jerusalem Post. Calling
openly for the genocidal carpet-bombing of Gaza, Sharon declared: “We need to
flatten entire neighborhoods in Gaza. Flatten all of Gaza. The Americans didn’t
stop with Hiroshima – the Japanese weren’t surrendering fast enough, so they
hit Nagasaki, too.” Sharon’s remarks are not the ravings of a fringe
lunatic -- they are completely consistent with the teachings of the pioneers of
Zionist ideology, like Dr. David Wolffsohn, the late World Zionist Organization
chairman, who told a meeting of Zionists in 1907 that Jews must put aside their
differences and unite to “conquer the world.” Vladimir Jabotinsky, the
father of the Revisionist strain of Zionism, said candidly, “We want a Jewish
Empire.” Zionism is a “death-crazed narcissistic cult,” said Rich Siegel,
a former Zionist who saw the light. The inhuman precepts of the Jewish
supremacist mentality that is so prevalent in Israel today can only result in
more violence and bloodshed, more misery and suffering for the Palestinians and
Arabs in general.
While the West bears much
shame and responsibility for aiding and abetting the Zionist project and all of
its murderous and destructive consequences, bringing history into accordance
with the facts is one way to uplift the Palestinians whose struggle for freedom
and justice goes on.
Brandon Martinez is
a freelance writer and journalist from Canada whose area of expertise is
foreign policy, international affairs and 20th and 21st century history.
His writing is focused on issues such as Zionism, Israel-Palestine,
American and Canadian foreign policy, war, terrorism and deception in media and
politics. Readers can contact him at martinezperspective@hotmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment