Saturday, November 23, 2013

308 JFK and the Media

It is exactly 50 years ago that Kennedy was assassinated.

I have never studied the JFK case, but I knew for many years that Oswald very probably had not done it.

In these last days I have read a few good articles about it, and now I see that the fact that Oswald could have done it, is zero.
Also I learned that there is a very strong case to believe that the CIA did it.
Or factions of the CIA, possibly in cooperation with the Mossad.
I will publish some of the articles hereafter.

Last night I saw Oliver Stone's film JFK, and a lot of the information that I just recently discovered turned out to be known in 1969 and was used at the Clay Shaw trial.

I am a little ashamed: the biggest part of my life I was 'not in the know',  but the information was already available.
Thank god for the internet.

The Media.
I did not actively make an inventory, but I came across a lot of nonsense info about the JFK murder, in the last week.
TV pundits ( Maarten van Rossum)  and journalists of well known papers ( Keulemans at Volkskrant, Vught at NRC, a documentary on National Geographic)  who reiterated the official story and showed their disdain for the 'conspiracy community'.

One wishes for a life tv interrogation of these 'journalists' where they are asked their explanation for many facts that do not fit into their story:

- the 40+ witnesses who heard shots from the grassy knoll
- Kennedy being blown backwards ( towards Oswald)  by the third bullet, instead of away from Oswald.
- the magic bullet theory.
- the pristine condition of this bullet
- how Oswald could denounce his citizenship and go to Russia for 2 years.
- how Oswald could get his passport back and re-enter the USA, a few years later
- how Oswald is always described as dumb,m but yet had a high IQ and had very high secrecy clearance at age 18.
- how Oswald was having very high security clearance, as he knew secrets, and yet could leave for Russia.
- how there could be so many 'Oswald-look-alikes' who all behaved  in such a way that after the murder this behavior would 'prove' his gilt: 'Oswald' was in Mexico visiting Cuban and Russian embasseys.
... one 'Oswald' was a hitch-hiker who showed extreme interest in the possibility of assassinating Kennedy and asked to be dropped off at the Grassy Knoll.
Etc. etc.
- How Oswald could shoot 3 times in 5,6 seconds and even through the foliage of trees could hit the moving target..
- how it could be that Oswald's face had no trace of Nitrogen, which is impossible if you have fired a shot.
- how a 22 year old marine like Oswald overnight became good friends with high society people like 'baron' De Mohrenschildt and Michael and Ruth Paine.
-  how Ruth Paine gave Oswald a job at the Book Depository, but did not tell him about another job-offer for much higher wages.
- how it came that the security-people who always stand on the back of Kennedy's car, were summoned to leave just before the assassination, which brought one security-man clearly in unbelief.
- if these journalists know about the Chicago plot to kill Kennedy, a plot with 3 real assassins and one patsy: also a 'gruntled' ex marine who had worked in Japan in relation with U2 planes. This plot was tipped off and the men were arrested.
- if these journalists know that the official medical info about the front of Kennedy's brain being blown off, is denied by the witness of 40 doctors who saw Kennedy's body. They all said it was Kennedy's back of his head that was blown off, which is only possible if the killer shot from behind the grassy knoll.

This is just a small number of questions, off the top of my head.

I must admit that I did not thoroughly study the official story. But the pundits and journalists on MSM  were not at all convincing. They served nonsense, bullshit.  So I guess they have no convincing arguments. A few bribed witnesses like Oswald's wife and his brother. Everybody can say everything.  Quite a few witnesses who spoke out were killed, and quite a few waited more than 20 years before speaking out, becasuse of fear.  So the testimony of Marina Oswald and of Oswald's brother are not convincing.  And remember: Oswald was a CIA asset who acted like he hated Kennedy.  That was his role. His job. Maybe he could not do otherwise at home.

I think it was like this:
1.  The Powers that Be ( military-industrial Complex, army people, strong anti-communists, influential jews)  decided to liquidate Kennedy.
Kennedy had made too many enemies:
He wanted peace with Russia and Castro.  He did not give in to air-support at the Bay of Pigs,which resulted in a blameful loss for the military. He wanted to stop the Vietnam war. He was supportive of the blacks emancipation.  He fought the maffia. And: He had told Ben Gurion that Israel would not be allowed to get a nuclear bomb.  That was the reason for the jews and their media power to become involved.

2. The CIA, helped by jewish citizens ( Ruth Paine), prepared a few patsy's who would be blamed for the assassination:  Oswald and T.A. Vallee ( the Chicago assassin).
The Chicago murder was prevented,  because somebody called the police.
Dallas was successful.

3. Probably  L. B. Johnson and Edgar Hoover did not know about the CIA's plan to murder JFK.
But after the murder they must have understood what had happened.
Yet they decided to help with the cover-up, because if the truth would come out, the consequences would be impossible to predict. Stability would be far away.

In the Media you will almost always read about Oswald as the lone assassin, and about conspiracy-crazies. But in this case still 60 % of the people accept the derogatory label of being crazy:

Note: Since 911 the number of articles that tell us that believing in any conspiracy is something foolish, has augmented dramatically. Is that why this vision went down from 81% in 2001 to 61% in 2013 ?


Last remark.
Mrs Lisa Pease who investigated the JFK case for about 20 years said: if you have read 10 books about JFK you know nothing. If you read 30 books, you still know little.  There is so much, so many articles, so many lies that are sold as facts.
People sometimes say I am a conspiracy-theorist. But I do not make theories. I am only looking for facts: what is true, what is false.

So, who am I ? Not an authority of course.
I only have One book about the assassination, which I only read half: 'The final Solution.'
Its the only source that shows the letter that Kennedy wrote to Ben Gurion.
So I think it is an important source, because if the jewish  Elite had no interest or part in the assassination, the MSM would have told us every day for the last 50 years how these evil CIA people killed their president. So their involvement was indispensable.

My next blog will be an article which is like a summary of the 2008 book by Jim Douglass:  "JFK and the Unspeakable".
( The book is praised by Oliver Stone, Robert Kennedy jr., John Perkis a.o.)

The next blog will be a copy of a Corbett Report article on JFK, and a blog by mrs. Lisa Pease,  plus a link to a 1 hour podcast by mrs. Pease.

Below you will find a short blog by Paul Craig Roberts.

The Kennedy Assassination : 50 Years Later

By Paul Craig Roberts

November 22, 2013 "Information Clearing House -  November 22, 2013, is the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The true story of JFK’s murder has never been officially admitted, although the conclusion that JFK was murdered by a plot involving the Secret Service, the CIA, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff has been well established by years of research, such as that provided by James W. Douglass in his book, JFK And The Unspeakable, published by Simon & Schuster in 2008. Ignore Douglass’ interest in the Trappist monk Thomas Merton and Merton’s prediction and focus on the heavily documented research that Douglass provides.

Or just turn to the contemporary films, taken by tourists watching JFK’s motorcade that are available on YouTube, which show clearly the Secret Service pulled from President Kennedy’s limo just prior to his assassination, and the Zapruder film that shows the killing shot to have come from President Kennedy’s right front, blowing off the back of his head, not from the rear as postulated in the Warren Commission Report, which would have pushed his head forward, not rearward.

I am not going to write about the assassination to the extent that the massive information permits. Those who want to know already know. Those who cannot face the music will never be able to confront the facts regardless of what I or anyone else writes or reveals.

To briefly review, the facts are conclusive that JFK was on terrible terms with the CIA and the Joint Chiefs. He had refused to support the CIA organized Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba. He had rejected the Joint Chiefs’ “Operation Northwoods,” a plan to commit real and faked acts of violence against Americans, blame Castro and use the false flag events to bring regime change to Cuba. He had rejected the Joint Chiefs case that the Soviet Union should be attacked while the US held the advantage and before the Soviets could develop delivery systems for nuclear weapons. He had indicated that after his reelection he was going to pull US troops out of Vietnam and that he was going to break the CIA into a thousand pieces. He had aroused suspicion by working behind the scenes with Khrushchev to defuse the Cuban Missile Crisis, leading to claims that he was “soft on communism.” The CIA and Joint Chiefs’ belief that JFK was an unreliable ally in the war against communism spread into the Secret Service.

It has been established that the original autopsy of JFK’s fatal head wound was discarded and a faked one substituted in order to support the official story that Oswald shot JFK from behind. FBI director J. Edgar Hoover and President Johnson knew that Oswald was the CIA’s patsy, but they also understood, as did members of the Warren Commission, that to let the true story out would cause Americans to lose confidence in their own government at the height of the Cold War.

Robert Kennedy knew what had happened. He was on his way to being elected president and to holding the plotters accountable for the murder of his brother when the CIA assassinated him. A distinguished journalist, who was standing behind Robert Kennedy at the time of his assassination, told me that the killing shots came from behind past his ear. He submitted his report to the FBI and was never contacted.

Acoustic experts have conclusively demonstrated that more shots were fired than can be accounted for by Sirhan Sirhan’s pistol and that the sounds indicate two different calibers of firearms.

I never cease to be amazed by the gullibility of Americans, who know nothing about either event, but who confidently dismiss the factual evidence provided by experts and historians on the basis of their naive belief that “the government wouldn’t lie about such important events” or “someone would have talked.” What good would it do if someone talked when the gullible won’t believe hard evidence?

Secret Service pulled from JFK’s limo

Zapruder film

James W. Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable, Simon & Schuster, 2008

Operation Northwoods:
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. 

No comments:

Post a Comment