Tuesday, July 26, 2011

154. Breivik.

This blog: http://tiny.cc/k51ziw

Update 3 and 5 sept 2011:

Is it possible that Breivik was a patsy, a brainwashed guy in a much bigger plot ?

Here is some information that points in that direction:

1)  One man who knew Breivik quite well just could not imagine that  Breivik did what he did. His explanation is that Breivik was brainwashed. ( Video )

2) There is a right wing website Gates of Vienna ( muslim bashers) who say that Breivik did write comments on their website every now and then, and always in GB english, as is learned on scandinavian schools. Yet his manifesto is in American english ...
They say that the manifesto mentions authors that are well known in Amerika, but hardly known over here.
They signal that the American Embassy has been montitoring extremists.
Reading this, I ( J.V.) ask myself  : Were they  looking for islamists, or were they really looking for an extreme anti-muslim that they could brainwash?

3) The 'News in English' newssite has a few interesting things :  

 Breivik has, according to newspaper Dagens Næringslive, told police that he used NOK 6 million (USD 1.1 million) for his terrorist plot.
Breivik was found to have declared a taxable income of just NOK 5,223 (USD 960) in 2007.

- Lippestad ( Breiviks lawyer, in Veterans Today wrongly translated by 'Google translate' as Lippe City ! )  told that Breivik had discussed his “travelling activities” in Norway and “very many countries” in “large parts of Europe,” during which time he had taken “around 20″ trips. 

4) Breivik has many quotes of an influential Scandinavian blogger in his Manifesto. This blogger, Fjordman, is in reality a certain whose father was a communist and looks 100% jewish.  There are more reasons to think this Fjordman was a pro- Israel agent: ( Bollyn ) ( Fjordman )

5) Then there is Veterans Today  that has a newspaper article translated by Google Translate.
(Breivik= Brewick. Lippe City is Breivik 's lawyer Lippestad. NOK is norwegian money.)

Breivik made telephone calls to the police during his killing spree.  Veterans finds the behavior of the police during the killing very inadequate and finds this suspicous. Also  the video of the reenactment of the killings on Utoya give the impression that the police have sympathy for Breivik, Veterans  says.

6) A commentor on Veterans Today , a certain Confused , at 16 august , writes:
 Michael Reshetnikov, the head of the opposition Belarussian Party of Patriots told Gazeta.ru online that that Breivik visisted  Belaruss three times this year, and that Breivik has trained under the  Bela Russian KGB general majoor Valery Lunev.
This  Valery Lunev is now CEO of  Far West LLC at  Dubai.
Far West LLC is a company that coordinates and does mercenary work... I  hope I summarise this correctly. They work for Halliburton and were founded by them.( Dick Cheney, Iraq, expenses plus )
Some of their work is approved by the CIA.
Another company they work with is Dilligence LLC, which was started by former intelligence people ( CIA, MI5 ) and they began in Iraq in 2003.

This makes us wonder if he worked alone, and if not: who were his sponsors ?
Who may have talked him into this ? And what was their goal?

One comment on the Breivik terror which I read somewhere and found interesting:   In the USA it will be easy for the government to pick up critics and put them in jail without any form of justice. Thanks to the 911 attack, which made the Patriot Act possible. (The thousands of papers were miraculously written in a few weeks time... or were they prepared before 911 ?)
Europe does not have such a  law.
Some wild attacks like Breivik's might do the trick. Collateral advantage: Utoya shows that it's dangerous to criticise Israel. ( We knew that after the murders on Olaf Palme and Anne Lindh.)

My original blog, written in july: 

It is 23 years ago that I have made the transformation:
Before 1988 I was defending immigrants in discussions with people who were 'against foreigners'.
After 1988 I began to realise that they became so numerous that our society was bound to get in trouble.
I understood that any group of people, any society will get in trouble from big influx of people.
The larger the number of immigrants, the bigger the problems.
The more different the immigrants, the bigger the problems.

From 1990 to 2003 I was a critic of large scale immigration. Not a critic of muslims.
I was a big fan of Pim Fortuyn, and lay down flowers at his house the day after he was murdered. There were thousands of people who did the same.
Fortuyn was afraid of the muslims, but for me the problems were not a result of their religion, but only of the large number of immigrants, and the big difference, genetic and cultural.
Fortuyn was my hero because he was able to put large scale immigration on the agenda without being crushed in all the media.  No way! He was so eloquent that he crushed rivaling politicians. On camera!

I was angry. When I looked around in the world I saw ethnic groups living together for centuries and still fighting one another: Blacks and whites in the USA, Hutu's and Tutsi's in Rwanda, Blacks and Arabs in Sudan, Kurds and Turks, Basks and Spanish, Serbs and Croats etc. etc.

Now we were creating the same situation in our own country. In a very rapid way.
Why were we setting all the conditions right for ages of ethnic strive?  For endless human suffering?
To what avail?
How was it possible that discussions on this subject were impossible?
Why was anyone who pointed at these tragic examples of multi-ethnic societies accused of fascism ?

In 1996 I studied the theory of an evolutionary psychologist,  J. P. Rushton. His book explained it all: ethnic groups are different in appearance ànd in behavior because of different conditions in the location of their evolution. Not only IQ's are different, but also behavior-preferences.

To make a long story short: I learned that it was especially jewish theorists who teached us that all people are the same. That IQ does not exist. Cannot be measured. Race does not exist. We  are all the same. Its just the upbringing that makes us differ.
The Stephen Jay Goulds,  Lewontin's and Boas's of this world.  They fooled all of Academia, for decennia.
Why ?

Well, if people are only different because of their different upbringing, then immigration is not a long-term problem: after a few decennia we will all have the same culture and there will be no problems anymore.

This took care of the academic world.( Blog 85)

The Holocaust industry took care of the rest.  Discrimination was the biggest sin that one could perpetrate in the years between 1970 and 2000.  The years of limitless immigration.
Anyone who wanted to stop this immigration was ostracised: he was a Nazi.
His political career was ended before it began.
He was branded for life, as well as his children.

Mr. BREIVIK, READ MY LIPS:   you are a fan of Israel because they hate the muslims, just like you.

But what you did not see yet is this: It's these jewish interests that brought the muslims in your country!

What you missed is that we all were accused of being fascists if we criticised immigration, but at the same time Israel did not let any immigrants enter their country !

What you don't know is that some of the earliest muslim-bashers were fierce left wing pro-immigration activists in their earlier lives. ( David Horowitz, Leon de Winter). (Blog 78)

Just like it is jews who created your muslim-hatred, it is the same jews who did everything to get our countries full of muslim immigrants ! (Blog 136)

It may be true that social democrats were instrumental to the large scale immigration, but it was the doctrine that 'all people are the same' which made it possible.  It was the extreme bashing of immigration-critics that prevented all discussion.
Who gave us these wrong idea's ?
Who made every discussion impossible?
Their names were Boas, Popper, Lewontin, Gould etc.
The fact that they did not believe their own theories can be deduced from the fact that non of them criticised Israel or the jewish religion.
Israel that throws people out of their own country instead of letting strangers come in.
The jewish religion that says that non-jews are closer to horses than to jews.

No comments:

Post a Comment