Wednesday, July 10, 2013

296 Michael Hastings was liquidated.

This blog:

How do we know what is true and what are lies?

Well, if the source doesn't benefit from what he says, there is a higher chance that  he speaks the truth.
Another rule:   Miracles are really really rare.  Too many miracles on one day: don't believe the story.

Let's count the number of miracles on the day Hastings was killed in a road accident.

Te situation:
1. Hastings was on to 'some big new case'.
2. He planned to go 'off the radar' for a while. ( See below, or look here)
3. The FBI was trying to get information from his close friends, so he advised his friends not to say anything without a lawyer.

This  is what Hastings emailed his friends.
Only 22 hours later:

3. Hastings drives at 4 am and at very high speed through a red traffic light.
4. A few seconds later he drives against a tree.
5. A photographer from 'Breaking News' happens to be parked at the crossing where Hastings drives through the red light and his windshield-camera films Hastings as he drives through the red light, and also proves that Hastings was not followed by another car.

How often does a person drive through a red traffic light, at very high speed?
Not very often, as people who do so will not get the chance to make it a habit: it will kill you.
And ìf this happens, how often is it filmed by a camera, so that we can be sure that Hastings was not followed ?

This is the official story.
Police give no information, but very quickly said that there was no reason to suspect any thing else than a normal accident.
( How can they know? They did not take the time for an investigation.)

My first conclusion: 
Even with only the information as given above I suspected a liquidation:
- the motives were there: a journalist who was able to get a very high general ousted, and now is 'on to a big case' :  'They' must know what he is 'on to ' ( PRISM ?)  and don't want it to be publicised.
 - To drive through red light:  a rare thing.
- To drive through a red light at high speed: a very rare thing.
- Then to hit a tree and get on fire:  a very very very rare coïncidence .


On 9 july an investigative journalist Kimberly Dvorak was in L.A. to find out.

She came with more facts:

- Nobody has been granted the police-report yet.
- Police and firemen 'could not comment' or said they were told 'not to comment'.
- The fire was extremely hot, as military personnel said to Dvorak. Not normal for a car like this. The car was brand-new.
- The car drove from north to south, but its motor was found to the  north of the wreckage. At 50 meters distance.  University professors that Dvorak asked about this are puzzled.

What could have happened?  Could he be drunk? 
- He could be drunk, but there were zero skid-marks. Hastings did not try to use the breaks.

Could the car have malfunctioned ?  Exploded from itself?  Or was an explosive put on board?
Mercedes makes their car in such a way that they will never blow up. They take great care for that.

Could controle over the car be 'hijacked', could it be remote-controled ?
That could be. The University of San Diego gave out a report in 2010 in which they took a normal car like a Nissan Centra, and took a normal  iPad and with that were able to hack into the cars system and operate: - the accellerator, steering,  breaks, windshield-wipers, lights..


Here are some interesting reactions that appeared on ICH:
Bob· ..hours ago
I smell a rat with the "roving" camera operator who just happened to be awake, in his vehicle and with his camera on at roughly 4 a.m. so as to coincidentally catch Hastings' vehicle speed past and then catch the burning vehicle moments after it exploded into flames. Oh, and to also make sure to put that beer bottle in frame despite there being absolutely no indication it came from Hastings' car. Someone digging into that creep's background?!!!
Frank· 13 hours ago
You know it's dodgy when the police or other authorities quickly put out the "no foul play" / "nothing to see here" statement. Investigations of this nature take a long time.

"As to what “upcoming disaster” the US is preparing for, this report continues, appears to be “strongly related” to last weeks assassination of American reporter Michael Hastings who was killed while attempting to reach the safety of the Israeli Consulate in Los Angeles, and as we had reported on in our 20 June report Top US Journalist Attempting To Reach Israeli Consulate Assassinated.

Further to be noted about Hastings assassination by the Obama regime is the continued US mainstream propaganda news cover-up of it, though many freelance reporters continue to uncover the truth, such as Jim Stone whose investigation noted that the rear portion of Hastings car was blown open and shredded with the rest of the car nicely intact, which runs counter to the “official” story that this vehicle has hit a tree."

Obama Requests 15,000 Russian Troops
For “Upcoming” Disaster

Then there is this, written by the controversial character Sorcha Fal, so why is it the only story I can find on line about a drone hitting his car?:

"Interestingly, this report says, GRU “electronic assets” reporting on the assassination of Hastings were conducting “routine operations” in the Southern California region monitoring the US Navy’s testing of an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) known as the ShadowHawk® [see video HERE] [photo 3rd left] manufactured by Vanguard Defense Industries.

While performing what GRU analysts say in this report were “routine night flight observations” of a small fleet of ShadowHawks® at the US Marine Base Camp Pendleton in Southern California during the early morning hours of 18 June, a single ShadowHawk® broke formation and “sped” towards the Los Angeles whereupon it fired upon a vehicle nearing the intersection of Highland and Melrose avenues at around 04:15 PDT destroying it and, presumably, killing its sole occupant Michael Hastings.

Upon the ShadowHawk® destroying this vehicle, described by eyewitnesses as a Mercedes Benz, this report continues, GRU signal intelligence analysts (SIGINT) identified “at least” 4 cellular communications between this vehicle and the Israeli Consulate located at 11766 Wilshire Blvd, and which further GRU GPS and cellular data analysis revealed Hastings was headed towards at a “high rate of speed.”

"...As the ShadowHawk® attack upon Hastings’s vehicle occurred with his being only 14.3 kilometers (8.9 miles) from his presumed safety under Israeli protection at their Los Angeles consulate, this report says, even at that early hour many residents were awakened by the explosion providing “excellent” eyewitness testimony which “severely” conflicts with Americas mainstream propaganda organs.

Where the US mainstream media is reporting Hastings’s vehicle was destroyed after it slammed into a tree, this report continues, these eyewitnesses say otherwise, and as has been further noted by the InfoWars News Service who write:

“Photographs of the crash scene… reveal that the car Hastings was in did not experience a high-speed crash. “There is no impact damage to this car. The only damage there is BLOWN OUT in the back, not smashed in the front and it obviously missed the tree as it rolled to a stop,” writes Jim Stone. “This was a Mercedes, not a Pinto, which means it did not burst into flames on its own. One (seldom quoted) eyewitness said the car ‘exploded.’”.."

Top US Journalist Attempting To Reach
Israeli Consulate Assassinated

See also:
Michael Hastings OBVIOUSLY murdered by bomb on gas tank

An excerpt from the LA Times article: 
In an email sent hours before his death in a single-car L.A. crash, journalist Michael Hastings wrote that his “close friends and associates” were being interviewed by the FBI and he was going to “go off the radar for a bit.”
According to the email, sent to KTLA, Hastings wrote he was working on a “big story” and was going to disappear. He told his colleagues that if the FBI came to interview them, they should have legal counsel present.
Update:  here is an article from Veterans Today, covering the same subject:


No comments:

Post a Comment