Friday, February 15, 2013

258 Syrië, kort samengevat. Willy van Damme.


Willy van Damme is een zeer goed geïnformeerd blogger.

Hier vat hij 'Syrië' in enkele zinnen samen:



Je moet wel beseffen dat er in het land onderhuids zoals elders in de regio een pak tegenstellingen waren. Zoals die tussen stedelingen en het platteland, de moderne seculiere middenklasse en de diepgelovige vooral arme onderlaag.
Er waren de religiueze tegenstellingen, die tussen een corrupte klasse en anderen die dat haten, rijk en arm, enzovoort….
Feit is echter dat, zonder het cruciale ophitsen via o.m. de moskeeën door Qatar en Saoedi Arabië en zonder de wil van Israël en het westen om Assad te vermoorden, Syrië dit jaar door honderduizenden toeristen bezocht was geweest. Het land is immers gewoon prachtig.
Zonder dat hadden Ahmed en Fatima nu op een terras in Deir Ezzor, Homs of Aleppo ongestoord een koffie of een rakki zitten drinken terwijl hun jonge spruiten wat verder spelen, zonder lastig te worden gevallen.
Dat is het misdadige, het zeer zwaar criminele van een Obama, Hague, Reynders, Merkel en company. En stop daar een AI, Pax Christi en de klassieke media maar gerust bij. Ze zijn allemaal medeschuldig.
En het gaat hem voor mij helemaal niet over de familie Assad en haar lot maar over Ahmed en Fatima uit Syrië. Zij verdienen respect.



Thursday, February 14, 2013

257 How the riches of Angola were taken by Wall Street..

This blog: http://tiny.cc/w09hsw

Author Douglas Reed describes in this Book, in Chapter 3, how Angola was liberated from the Portuguese,  in the name of self-government of course. But the real powers behind the rebels were Wall Street Power Elite.  
They used mrs. Roosevelt as an asset. 

Here is the story of Angola, through Reed's eyes: 


Chapter Three

Luanda is one of the least known capital cities and its hinterland, Angola, one of the least known
countries in the world. Luanda, with its ancient fort brooding over the southern tip of its
magnificent bay, would be the big-game hunter's and fisherman's paradise, were it better known
and more accessible: in the respective seasons you may see the landrovers returning to town with
buck and buffalo strapped across the bonnets, or the boats coming in laden with barracuda and
marlin.

When I first saw Luanda, it was abustle with building activity, like all the other cities I have seen in
this decade, and the streets were thronged with people of every shade of complexion between black
and white, all getting on alongside each other very well. Yet twelve years before this hardly a being
in the place would have given Portugal more than two years in Angola. That was after the terrible
initial shock of the attack of drugged and drunken assassins from across the Congolese border.

Angola has been a Portuguese possession for five hundred years. One of the great Portuguese
navigators, Diege Cam, first landed there in 1482 and left his mark in the traditional Portuguese
shape of the Cross. That was centuries before the emergence of the British Empire which in its brief
day occupied a quarter of the globe and ruled over a quarter of the earth's inhabitants, before
dissolving to leave as its only memorial a gibbering wraith called the British Commonwealth,
wherein the erstwhile “lion cubs” turned into yelping jackals snarling at the other members.

All that time Portuguese Angola was there. For a few years the Dutch appeared on the scene and
the Portuguese Governor withdrew upriver, but in seven years he was back again in the ancient fort.
During this time the Portuguese in Angola even hived off a colony in South America which today
has become the greatest state in that half-continent, wealthy, with a population of fifty million and a
glowing future: Brazil.

Among the great “ifs” of history is why the Portuguese Government did not make of Angola a
second Brazil. All the conditions were present: enormous space, and boundless mineral wealth.
Diego Cam's discovery was neither exploited nor developed, although he planted his cross on the
coast of Angola years before Columbus discovered America. These Portuguese navigators, who set
out in cockleshells and knew not if they would end by falling off the edge of the earth, were the
spacemen of five hundred years ago.

While all the great events of the next five hundred years racked the world around it, Angola
continued its placid way of life, undisturbed by the demon “progress”. Differences of race were not
felt or known as such. The difference between relatively schooled and skilled White people from
overseas and undeveloped Black ones set the pattern of life; colour as such played no part in it.

In this enormous territory (it is almost as large as Europe and it has a thousand miles of coastline
stretching from north to south along the Atlantic) the Portuguese until the beginning of this century
effectively occupied only the coastal strip, and that in small numbers.

The huge Black population of the interior, had they wished, could have just nudged the Portuguese
into the sea: hardly any troops were garrisoned there. But they never did this. The Portuguese,
alone among the colonizing powers, seem to have understood and come to grips with Africa. While
others came, stayed a hundred years or so, and then scuttled away, Portuguese Angola, unknown or


forgotten, stayed on. It saw all the others come and it saw them go, and now that its five hundredth
anniversary approaches it is still there.

forgotten, stayed on. It saw all the others come and it saw them go, and now that its five hundredth
anniversary approaches it is still there.

Who were these creatures? Mr. Robert Ruark, an expert on terrorism and torture from his
experience of the Mau Mau in Kenya, identifies them: “... hired strangers, strangers drunk on the
local pombe, strangers fired by hashish, strangers recruited and semi-trained across the northern
Angolese border in the Congo, strangers with no real axe to grind except against an innocent neck,
strangers armed by the terrorists of Algeria, strangers motivated by Russia and China and other
Communist affiliates.”[4]

Mr. Ruark did not add what I will append here: these hideous miscreants were the protegés of those
ravening wolves, the Liberals of New York, as well as the hirelings of Communism. Their leader,
an abominable creature of many aliases, is best known as Holden Roberto. Just eighteen months
before the massacre he went to the United States where he was made warmly welcome by the
American Committee on Africa, the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and Mrs.
Eleanor Roosevelt.

These influential acquaintanceships bore fruit. Holden Roberto received both financial and political
support from United States sources. Then about a year later came the massacre, of which Holden
Roberto boasted to a correspondent of the Paris journal, Le Monde. He was asked, “There is proof
of tortures perpetrated upon Portuguese men, women and children. Do you deny these horrors?” He
answered, “No, all that is true ... they massacred everything.” “Women and children included?” he
was asked, and he replied, “Yes, why deny it?”

Mr. James Burnham (see above and footnote [5]), speaking of the propagandist successes in the
world press and at the United Nations of such revolting gangs of murderers as that of Holden
Roberto, said, “Not the least of these propaganda victories has been the concealment of the events
of 15 March 1961. And even today some readers of this book will wonder: can these horrors that
Bernardo Teixeira recounts really be true? Can they possibly be true? Is it conceivable that human
beings actually ran other humans through rotary saws?[5]

“Alas for mankind, not only are these things true, but these things are not the worst, of what Holden
Roberto's squads did and have done: of some things it is simply not possible to write.”

I studied the story of 15 March 1961 for years before I was able to go to the scene of the massacre
and recreate what happened for myself. In probing the background, especially the background of
foreign support for these sub-human massacrists, my eye was immediately caught by the name of
Mrs. Roosevelt as their patroness. This woman, who posed as the mother of all good works and
good causes, first attracted my student's attention in 1949, when I was in America. At that time the
Soviet agent in the American Government, Alger Hiss, the man who at Yalta, at the dying President
Roosevelt's side turned the Allied victory into a Communist victory and an Allied defeat, had been
exposed and the Liberal Establishment was waging a tremendous campaign to snatch its favourite
son from the jaws of justice.


I observed with a shock of surprise that Mrs. Roosevelt identified herself with it, and went to the
length of publicly attacking the man who had denounced Hiss. From that time on I was prepared for
anything that Mrs. Roosevelt might do in her role as patroness of liberalism, and I was no longer
surprised when she entertained such as Holden Roberto to tea.
I observed with a shock of surprise that Mrs. Roosevelt identified herself with it, and went to the
length of publicly attacking the man who had denounced Hiss. From that time on I was prepared for
anything that Mrs. Roosevelt might do in her role as patroness of liberalism, and I was no longer
surprised when she entertained such as Holden Roberto to tea.

I came to think of Mrs. Roosevelt as the reincarnation of Madame Defarge. She knitted by the
guillotine as heads fell into the basket. Mrs. Roosevelt entertained murderers to tea and wrote her
unreadable “My Day” column, while women and children, Black, Brown and White, were being
hacked to pieces by her visitors' gangs in Angola.

Thus, by way of the Yalta Conference, the “hidden hand behind the scenes”, and the rise of all-
destroying “Liberalism”, we come to the massacre of 15 March 1961 in Northern Angola: the
continuing thread from Mrs. Roosevelt's patronage of Alger Hiss to her tea-party with Holden
Roberto twenty years later and his welcome by the Communist-infested departments of the
American administration is clear to see.

The initial shock in Angola was almost lethal. In the whole vast territory there were but a few
platoons of soldiers, Black and White, and police. Few then believed that Angola could survive.
But the unexpected, the almost incredible happened.

The civilian population of the massacre-area resisted fiercely and drove the murder squads back
into the Congo. The Black population never gave the invaders that support without which
(according to Che Guevare) no guerilla attack can succeed. Within a few days troop reinforcements
began to arrive from Portugal and soon the situation came under control. The mass of Black
peasants and farmers who had fled into the bush, either from fear of the murderers or of being
mistaken for them, began to trickle back, and in less than a year 140,000 of them had officially
presented themselves to the Portuguese authorities who fed, clothed, and housed them and provided
medical assistance.

No questions were asked, although terrorists may have been among this returning throng. The
Portuguese from the start, both in Angola and Mozambique, always practised this policy of
receiving-back and reincorporating into the Portuguese community. They are wise people in their
dealings with the Black population and have thus succeeded in Africa where others failed.

The atrocious event of 15 March 1961 went unnoticed by the outside world. As Mr. Burnham said,
its concealment was one of the greatest successes of the terrorist leaders and of “Liberalism”, and it
was achieved by the complicity of that vast network of “liberals” which in our generations has
come to control all means of public information: press, radio, television.

One American publisher produced the authentic story, with all the pictorial and other evidence, but
in Britain and other “enlightened” lands no one would touch it. The international campaign of
propaganda against Portugal continued unabated and was taken up by persons who had come to
political office in such places as Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

The resistance of the Angolan population, Black, White and Mulatto, and the arrival of military
reinforcements, put an end to the immediate threat to Angola, and from that point the epic of
Angola began. The atrocious event led to the rebirth of Angola, which began to look like becoming
“a second Brazil”. Its development in the decade after 15 March 1961 was so great, and in such
contrast to its former lethargic condition, that when I arrived there in 1973 the current jest was that
a statue ought to be erected to Holden Roberto because he had shocked and shaken the country out
of its colonial slumber.


A sudden revival of confidence followed the defeat and flight of the Bakongo murderers, the return
of the great plantation owners and the continuance on their land of the small ones, the repossession
and resumption of work in hundreds of plantations which had been attacked or destroyed. The
discovery of offshore oil in 1966 and the participation of several great foreign concerns in its
exploitation and in further prospecting helped. In places where thought had never been given to
Angola as a place for investment, the awareness began to spread that it probably has the greatest
unexploited mineral wealth in Central Africa.

A sudden revival of confidence followed the defeat and flight of the Bakongo murderers, the return
of the great plantation owners and the continuance on their land of the small ones, the repossession
and resumption of work in hundreds of plantations which had been attacked or destroyed. The
discovery of offshore oil in 1966 and the participation of several great foreign concerns in its
exploitation and in further prospecting helped. In places where thought had never been given to
Angola as a place for investment, the awareness began to spread that it probably has the greatest
unexploited mineral wealth in Central Africa.

The effect of the 1961 atrocity was to cause the Lisbon government to put Angola at the top of its
agenda paper. The support of the primitive Black population, which had been crucial in turning the
tide of invasion, must be maintained and established. One immediate result was the abolition of the
old colonial system of the indigenas, who were not recognized as full Portuguese citizens and were
subject to compulsory labour. For thirteen years now all Blacks have had the right, by simple
application, to become Portuguese citizens, and about a million have taken advantage of this.

A second effect was the emphasis laid on education, which for a backward population represents
the great road to improvement: in 1960 only 100,000 Black children were at school: in 1971 there
were 511,000 children and students in the schools and universities, and at least 400,000 of these
were Blacks (all places of education, like the hospitals, are integrated and Black and White scholars
or patients occupy adjoining desks or beds).

The other great effect of the 1961 attack was the vast growth of the system of roads in Angola,
partly due to military necessity (with an army of 100,000 men, Black and White, suddenly
appearing in the country), and partly to the great economic expansion which occurred in the
following decade. Formerly, during the rainy season, roads in the interior became unusable; the
plantations in the Coffee Belt and the diamond mines in the Lunda [ed: Luanda?] district, as well as
the pleasant small towns which have grown up in the interior during this century, were almost cut
off from their needs. By 1971 there were over five thousand kilometres of tarmac roads serving
north-south traffic and branching eastward.

On the morning of 16 March 1961 (that is, the morning after the massacre), it seemed impossible
that Angola's Coffee Belt, its main source of income, could ever live again. But in the next ten
years the coffee output was doubled. Much of the coffee-forest land is worked by Black growers
who get a guaranteed minimum price through the Coffee Institute at Carmona.[7] This marketing
system has achieved the result (near-miraculous in Africa) of weaning the Black smallholder away
from his immemorial method of hand-to-mouth, daily-bread farming, and making him a man of
substance with a rising standard of living.

For twelve years after the massacre of 1961 the picture of that day never left my mind. Not Stalin
or Hitler had ever invented such horrors as these. Now that I was in Angola I made it my first
purpose to go to the scene where those things happened which (as Mr. James Burnham said) were
“simply impossible to describe”, to talk to survivors and generally clear my mind about something
which it still found difficult to believe.

So I set out for the Coffee Belt one day with a most helpful guide in a military convoy (the road
was by this time pretty well clear of the Chinese land-mines planted by night, although a wrecked


truck or two still lay about, but was not secure from the odd shots fired from safe ambush in the
shade forests, where some of Roberto Holden's miserable hirelings still lurked).

truck or two still lay about, but was not secure from the odd shots fired from safe ambush in the
shade forests, where some of Roberto Holden's miserable hirelings still lurked).

One was the regrouping of the tribespeople in protected villages, and I saw many of them along this
road and later in the east and southeast, where other Chinese-motivated and Soviet-motivated
groups of terrorists still made desultory forays across the border. The aldeamentos, or protected
villages, were a good answer to the menace in one way: they did guard the people from the
arsonists and abductors who plagued them when they lived in isolated groups. A disadvantage is
that the Black tribesman clings tenaciously to the soil he knows, however perilous, and dislikes to
be separated by distance from his land.

However, safety comes first and the Ovambos and others accepted this enforced regrouping, albeit
with inward reservations on which the terrorists will undoubtedly play. As we went along we
passed groups of coffee-picking women going to and from the shade forests, escorted by an armed
militiaman (he is usually a returned fugitive living in the protected village). Another idea born of
this emergency was the mobile gendarmerie, Black soldiers or policemen grouped in a cantonment,
equipped with transport and arms, and in contact by radio with all isolated plantations or
aldeamentos of the district.

The Portuguese have built heavily on their policy of reincorporation and regeneration, and some of
their most efficient and effective Black troops are the Flechas, returned fugitives (or returned
terrorists: as I said, no questions are asked). These are highly-trained and very tough warriors who
go out on their own to pick up a terrorist or two or detect arms-caches. The array of Russian,
Chinese, Algerian, Cuban, Iron Curtain and other automatic weapons, grenades, landmines, mortars
and the rest collected by them, which I saw at one place, was proof of their devotion to their job.

The most fascinating of all the new ideas born of these problems was, for me, the regiment of Black
Dragoons whose officers welcomed me with great good cheer when I visited them. Their discipline
was exemplary, the condition of their lines, horses and barracks would have gladdened the
nostalgic eye of any ex-cavalryman from overseas. Ninety per cent of the troopers are Blacks and
their commander told me that none of them had ever seen a horse before they began their gruelling
training as Portuguese Dragoons in Angola. This rebirth of cavalry is one of the strangest and yet
most logical results of the need to seek out and stampede and rout creatures who never fight, whose
weapons and methods are the darkness of night, the buried landmine, the ambush and the arsonist's
torch. The Black Dragoons go out for weeks at a time, under their own officers, and usually come
back with a prisoner or two and more Chinese or Russian weapons to add to the collection in the
armoury.

Everywhere I went, in the north-west, the north, the east and the southeast, the Portuguese way of
handling their problem seemed to be producing results. In several places I saw tribespeople who
had been driven out from their homes by fear or levelled weapon, presenting themselves to the
Portuguese authorities for readmission. They told their tale of capture and abduction and were
taken in and given one of the adobe houses which Portuguese soldiers, Black and White, were
building all around.

On this first journey we came to Quitexe, a place I particularly wanted to see because at Quitexe
there were two survivors who were able to tell an exact story of what happened on that day of
horror. There were a few survivors in other places, but they were usually too demented from the


things they had seen to give a lucid account. At Quitexe was a butcher whose name has become
famous.

things they had seen to give a lucid account. At Quitexe was a butcher whose name has become
famous.

From Quitexe our convoy went on to Carmona, the capital town of the coffee region, where another
fantastic fight for survival was fought and won. At the beginning of the day the people of Carmona,
like those in the twelve villages, were completely unaware that the day was to be different from any
other. When the doctor, having gone the twenty odd miles to Quitexe on his professional round and
turned back when he saw what was happening there, drove into Carmona with the alarm, the townspeople,
sitting at the pavement cafés, at first could not understand what he meant, so unprepared
were they for anything of the kind. Yet by the evening the townspeople (there were only five
soldiers in Carmona) under the doctor's leadership and that of his son (killed during the battle) had
improvised some sort of defence against the Congolese attack which obviously was to follow.

It came in the dusk, when the drums began in the elephant grass and in Carmona the church bells
all began to toll. The noise of the drums came nearer and nearer, and louder, and then thousands of
voices, shouting kill, kill!, joined in the demoniac pandemonium. At last the murderers burst from
the elephant grass and the townspeople with their few weapons fought back, killed the frontal few,
and then drove in Landrovers and old motor cars, headlights full on, into the mass.

At last the murderers fell back into the high grass and departed: the staccato chorus of kill, kill
continued, but it grew fainter and then died away. And that was the end of the Congolese incursion
for the time being. The basic idea was to take Carmona and then claim that “the liberation
movement” was in control of northern Angola; at that point their accomplices at the United Nations
would without doubt have “recognized the new republic”. The Angolan population, Black, White
and Brown, had shown that they wanted no truck with the “liberators” and of their own strength
had beaten them back.

After that, troops began to arrive from Portugal and the immediate danger was over. Today as I
write, thirteen years later, the troops are still there, 100,000 of them, mainly Black but also many
Portuguese from Portugal itself, mostly peasants' sons whose devoutly Catholic mothers at home
cross themselves as they hear that “the World Council of Churches” is giving aid to the murderers.
What, they ask themselves, are their sons fighting for so far away, if even the churches want them
butchered.

I have in my mind's album many vivid pictures of that journey around Angola, by convoy and by
air. At one place in the eastern sector, where soldiers were building a protected village for the
returning fugitives and other soldiers were planting vegetables for them, I looked toward a distant
hill and saw a building which had the shape of a typical South African trading store. This surprised
me, because the trading store, so familiar a sight in South Africa and Lesotho, for some reason is
not found in Angola, so I asked what the odd-looking, lonely place could be. The Portuguese
colonel said it was “a shop” and added that it belonged to an eighty-year-old man who had been


there for fifty years and had survived three attempts by murderers (this time from Zambia) to kill
him.

there for fifty years and had survived three attempts by murderers (this time from Zambia) to kill
him.

Even the “freedom fighters”, stupid hirelings as most of them are, might be expected not to foray
across a frontier in order to kill one old man. But they came one night and fired through the door of
his room next to the store, where he was wont (as they evidently knew) to sit at his table. The
bullets went through the door and into the wall behind the table and would have perforated him but
by chance he was, for once, not there. They came again later with a machine gun and from a safe
distance sprayed the house with machine gun fire, the bullet holes leaving a dotted line across the
front of it. Once more they came and he went out with a shotgun and blazed away at the sound of
their firing. After that they left him alone, and he told me that if I came again ten years later he
would be there.

Another memory is that of a commanding general in one sector, on whose desk I saw a heavily
scored and annotated book. It was Sir Robert Taylor's Defeating Communist Insurgency in Malaya
and Vietnam. This general told me that he had read the book in the aeroplane on his way from
Lisbon to take up his command. When he arrived he gave his troops the order, “Don't press the
trigger unless you see something pointed at you.” The order was at first unpopular with the younger
officers, but they accepted it and behaved accordingly. This order, of course, was in line with the
Portuguese policy of retaining and encouraging the allegiance and support of the Black Portuguese
and it has produced results. Neither in Angola nor Mozambique have the murderers had much
success with the Black Portuguese population, who know all too well the sort of thing their
“liberators” do.

Another memory, a surprising one, is that of two Irish ladies whom I found in a remote place in the
eastern sector where for twenty years they had selflessly tended the sick and the poor. They paid
the highest tribute to the Portuguese as a nation and particularly to the Portuguese army, which,
they told me, was always ready to fly an urgent case to distant Luanda and to provide them with
transport to fetch a patient or stores. A German nursing sister at a mission not very far from the two
Irish ladies spoke of the Portuguese troops, and their ready helpfulness, in the same way.

This is an apt place to say that all the foreigners I met in Angola have admiration and respect for
the Portuguese and their troops, feelings which I soon came to share. People who had lived in other
parts of Africa and in many parts of the world all shared this regard.

A British Ambassador's lady once wrote of Portugal that she could not quite put her finger on what
makes the Portuguese such lovable people. In my case I can put my finger on exactly what qualities
gained my high respect for the Portuguese as I saw them in Angola. They are brave, steadfast in
adversity, tenacious, and proud. In this decadent couldn't-care-less generation they remain proud of
their nationality and of their unique historical achievement in opening up the world.

In Angola they are engaged, as they well know, in a war which they cannot militarily win because
it is not a war at all, in any sense in which the word was ever used in history. It is an international
conspiracy in which half the governments of the world join, wearing the mocking mask of moral
indignation: Russian and Chinese Communists, American Quakers, British Socialists, Norwegian,
Swedish and German Socialists. It can go on as long as hireling murderers can be enlisted by the


promise of loot, women, private vengeance and political appointments. It can go on as long as
America, Russia, China, “the satellite States”, Cuba and Algeria flood Africa with arms for these
hirelings, and as long as the Socialist party in England and the Roosevelt school in America lavish
money on them.

promise of loot, women, private vengeance and political appointments. It can go on as long as
America, Russia, China, “the satellite States”, Cuba and Algeria flood Africa with arms for these
hirelings, and as long as the Socialist party in England and the Roosevelt school in America lavish
money on them.

The best military brains realize that the Portuguese wars in Africa cannot be won by military means
because, as I have said, they are not wars. They are forays out of bush, jungle and forest land, into
which the murderers vanish, again at will, of gangs paid and armed from abroad. At any other time
in history they would have been chased back routed and destroyed, and peace would return. Today,
the noxious liberal cohorts all over the world would clamour “Portuguese aggression” and call for
“a bloodbath” (their favourite prescription for others).

What, then, can be done? A Portuguese general, Antonio de Spinola, deputy Chief-of-Staff of the
armed forces, in early 1974 suggested a solution in a book called Portugal and the Future. Starting
from the generally accepted theorem that the African “wars” cannot be won by military means
alone, he proposed the creation of a Federal Republic of Portugal in which each of the Portuguese
overseas territories would become independent states with a federal assembly in Lisbon and a
common head of state.

This plan would undoubtedly commend itself to the overseas Portuguese. territories, which have
often felt that government from metropolitan Portugal was too remote from their especial interests
and needs, and would strengthen their attachment to the Portuguese language, culture and heritage.
I do not myself see how it would prevent the international liberal conspiracy from continuing to pay
and arm the murderous marauders in the Congo (now Zaire), Zambia and Tanzania, or discourage
the Chinese and Soviet Russians from their obvious design of taking over Africa.

However, General de Spinola may see more clearly into the future than this wandering scribe. He
was dismissed immediately after the appearance of his book.

I left Angola one day with a sense of high respect for the Portuguese, whom I seldom encountered
in my earlier travels, and a conviction that, whatever the future, they had certainly brought the
revolt begun by the Roberto incursion of 15 March 1961 under control in Angola. At the start it
seemed that so small a country as Portugal could not long sustain the cost and strain of maintaining
a great army in Angola, but for thirteen years it had done just that and Angola itself, by its own
exertions and also by a few strokes of good fortune, such as the discovery of oil, was more
prosperous than ever before.

I said goodbye with regret and as I looked down on this enormous country, with its hundreds of
thousands of miles of empty ranchland and hundreds of miles of unused beaches, hoped one day I
might return and find that the grass had grown over the frightful memory of 15 March 1961.

Then I turned my face to the next stage on my long journey: Rhodesia.

Thursday, February 07, 2013

256 Ashkenazim are a mix of Khazars, European jews and M.E. jews.

This blog:



New study sheds light on the origin of the European Jewish 
population. 
January 16, 2013   ( The original article

Despite being one of the most genetically analysed groups, the origin of European Jews has remained obscure. However, a new study published online today in the journal Genome Biology and Evolution by Dr Eran Elhaik, 
a geneticist at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 

argues that the European Jewish genome is a mosaic of Caucasus, European, and Semitic ancestries
setting to rest previous contradictory reports of Jewish ancestry. Elhaik's findings strongly support the Khazarian Hypothesis, as opposed to the Rhineland Hypothesis, of European Jewish origins. This could have a major impact on the ways in which scientists study genetic disorders within the population.


The Rhineland Hypothesis has been the favoured explanation for the origins of present-day European Jews, until now. In this scenario Jews descended from Israelite-Canaanite tribes left the Holy Land for Europe in the 7th century, following the Muslim conquest of Palestine. Then, in the beginning of the 15th century, a group of approximately 50,000 left Germany, the Rhineland, for the east. There they maintained high endogamy, and despite wars, persecution, disease, plagues, and economic hardships, their population expanded rapidly to around 8 million in the 20th century. Due to the implausibility of such an event, this rapid expansion was explained by Prof Harry Ostrer, Dr Gil Atzmon, and colleagues as a miracle
Under the Rhineland Hypothesis, European Jews would be very similar to each other and would have a predominant Middle Eastern ancestry. 

The rival explanation, the Khazarian Hypothesis, states that the Jewish-convert Khazars – a confederation of Turkic, Iranian, and Mongol tribes who lived in what is now Southern Russia, north of Georgia and east of Ukraine, and 
who converted to Judaism between the 7th and 9th centuries – 
along with groups of Mesopotamian and Greco-Roman Jews, formed the basis of eastern Europe's Jewish population when they fled eastward (*) , following the collapse of their empire in the 13th century.
(*) Jan Verheul: I understand that these people went from Sout-Russia to Central Europe, which is not eastward. But maybe I don't understand exactly what the author means.  See also below: (**), where the author describes the wandering of the judeo-Khazars again.

 European Jews are thus expected to exhibit heterogeneity between different communities. While there is no doubt that the Judeo-Khazars fled into Eastern Europe and contributed to the establishment of Eastern European Jewry, argument has revolved around the magnitude of that contribution. Dr Elhaik's paper, 'The missing link of Jewish European ancestry: contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses', examined a comprehensive dataset of 1,287 unrelated individuals of 8 Jewish and 74 non-Jewish populations genotyped over 531,315 autosomal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This was data published by Doron Behar and colleagues in 2010, which Elhaik used to calculate seven measures of ancestry, relatedness, admixture, allele sharing distances, geographical origins, and migration patterns. 
These identified the Caucasus-Near Eastern and European ancestral signatures in the European Jews' genome along with a smaller, but substantial Middle Eastern genome. 

The results were consistent in depicting a Caucasus ancestry for all European Jews. The analysis showed a tight genetic relationship between European Jews and Caucasus populations and pinpointed the biogeographic origin of the European Jews to the south of Khazaria, 560 kilometers from Samandar –Khazaria's capital city. 

Further analyses yielded a complex multi-ethnical ancestry with a slightly dominant Caucasus -Near Eastern, large South European and Middle Eastern ancestries, and a minor Eastern European contribution. 

Dr Elhaik writes, "The most parsimonious explanation for our findings is that Eastern European Jews are of Judeo-Khazarian ancestry forged over many centuries in the Caucasus. Jewish presence in the Caucasus and later Khazaria was recorded as early as the late centuries BCE and reinforced due to the increase in trade along the Silk Road, the decline of Judah (1st-7th centuries), and the rise of Christianity and Islam. 
Greco-Roman and Mesopotamian Jews gravitating toward Khazaria were also common in the early centuries and their migrations were intensified following the Khazars' conversion to Judaism… 
The religious conversion of the Khazars encompassed most of the Empire's citizens and subordinate tribes and lasted for the next 400 years until the invasion of the Mongols. 

(**) At the final collapse of their empire in the 13th century, many of the Judeo-Khazars fled to Eastern Europe and later migrated to Central Europe and admixed with the neighbouring populations.

Dr Elhaik's findings consolidate, otherwise conflicting results describing high heterogeneity among Jewish communities and relatedness to Middle Eastern, Southern European, and Caucasus populations that are not explained under the Rhineland Hypothesis.
Although Dr Elhaik's study linked European Jews to the Khazars, there are still questions to be answered. 
-How substantial is the Iranian ancestry in modern day Jews? Since Eastern European 
-  Jews arrived from the Caucasus, where did Central and Western European Jews come from? 
- If there was no mass migration out of Palestine at the 7th century, what happened to the ancient Judeans? 
- And crucially for Dr Elhaik, how would these new findings affect disease studies on Jews and Eurasian populations? "Epidemiologists studying genetic disorders are constantly struggling with questions regarding ancestry, heterogeneity, and how to account for them," he says. "I hope this work will open up a new era in genetic studies where population stratification will be used more correctly."

More information: 'The Missing Link of Jewish European Ancestry: Contrasting the Rhineland and the Khazarian Hypotheses' by Eran Elhaik, Genome Biology and Evolution, DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs119 Provided by Oxford University Press 

Read more at: 
http://phys.org/news/2013-01-european-jewish-population.html#jCp


                ============================


Here is a jewish source about the Jewish rule in the Khazar state: 

A Resource for Turkic and Jewish History in Russia and Ukraine
Last Updated: December 10, 2012
For information about THE JEWS OF KHAZARIA, click hereRead about The Jews of Khazaria - the general-interest book about the Khazars in English.
This Khazarian art from the Don valley was added to the Khazaria Image Gallery on June 25, 2012.
"The Bones of the Old Ones: A Novel" by Howard Andrew Jones, published in December 2012, has Khazar characters aplenty, introduced as people who wear fur hats and high boots and carry curved swords. Some of the Khazars are presented as individual characters. The novel mixes fact and fiction and on page 304 admits "As to pure fantasy, the Khazars did not have a doomsday cult that welcomed the world's end in ice."


Medieval Kingdom of Khazaria, 652-1016
Over a thousand years ago, the far east of Europe was ruled by Jewish kings who presided over numerous tribes, including their own tribe: the Turkic Khazars. After their conversion, the Khazar people used Jewish personal names, spoke and wrote in Hebrew, were circumcised, had synagogues and rabbis, studied the Torah and Talmud, and observed Hanukkah, Pesach, and the Sabbath. The Khazars were an advanced civilization with one of the most tolerant societies of the medieval period. It hosted merchants from all over Asia and Europe. On these pages it is hoped that you may learn more about this fascinating culture.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF KHAZARIA
Essays summarizing the history of the Khazars, their principal cities, their culture, and their conversion to Judaism in the 9th century.
Shilovka ArcherILLUSTRATIONS AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF KHAZAR ARTIFACTS
The first gallery includes images of Turkic runes, Turkic tribe symbols, a Khazar metal disc with an engraving of the Star of David, Khazar-Saltovo amulets, depictions of an epic motif, Khazarian battle and hunting scenes, Khazar silver belts, and a map of Khazaria. The second link presents the display on 8th-9th century Khazar objects (including arms and armor) from the northwestern Caucasus from the March-September 2003 exhibit "Horse and Rider" at the State Historical Museum in Moscow.
THE KHAZAR CAPITAL CITY OF ATIL
Atil was the third capital city of Khazaria until it was conquered in 969. Archaeologists have located the remains of Atil.
THE KHAZAR FORTRESS OF SARKEL
Sarkel's fortress was one of Khazaria's most important, serving both as a defensive structure and a trading caravan stopover. Includes images of the layout of the fortress, a bronze warrior figurine, pottery, jewelry, bricks, and other objects.
AN EXPLORATION OF KHAZARIAN SHAMANISM
The original religion of the Khazars was Tengri Shamanism.
MEDIEVAL QUOTES ABOUT KHAZAR JUDAISM
Judaism was practiced widely among Khazars, as these authentic quotes from medieval chroniclers demonstrate.
DESCENDANTS OF THE KHAZARS IN EUROPE
What happened to the Khazars after the fall of their kingdom? This remains one of the most controversial questions in Khazar studies. Some new answers are beginning to emerge from new discoveries. The first essay summarizes the latest findings and uses these findings to re-evaluate the question. The second essay explains how we know that Eastern European Jews also descend from non-Khazar Jews. The third page gathers available evidence on genetics and shows that Ashkenazic Jews have substantial roots in the Middle East. The fourth page queries whether Jews who live in the Caucasus today descend from Khazar converts.
KHAZARIAN NAMES
A list of personal names that the Khazars used in their own country, including Turkic, Hebrew, and Slavic names.
·      Khazarian Names
EXCAVATION REPORTS FROM CHASTIYE KURGANY AND GOLDEN HILLS
Excavation reports with photographs of Khazarian graves and objects.
BIBLIOGRAPHY OF KHAZAR STUDIES
The largest database of references of books and articles about Khazarian history, including works in English, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Russian, Swedish, and other languages.
KHAZAR FICTION
A guide to conventionally-published novels, short stories, and poems about Khazaria.
THE KUZARI AND ITS AUTHOR
Yehudah ha-Levi was one of the greatest Spanish Jewish poets. He was born circa 1080 in Toledo, Spain, while it was under Islamic rule. He was a prolific writer of both Arabic and Hebrew poetry. From 1120 to 1140, ha-Levi wrote the famous 5-chapter book known as The Kuzari, which bases its storyline upon the Khazars' conversion to Judaism.
RUSSIAN-LANGUAGE HISTORIES OF KHAZARIA
This is a wonderfully illustrated guide to the history of the Khazars, compiled by staff at Rostov State University. The only unfortunate thing in the site is that Khazar Judaism is wrongly accused of causing strife and a civil war.
·      Khazarskiy Kaganat
THE KHAZAR CORRESPONDENCE
The Jews of Spain were introduced to facts about the Khazar kingdom largely through the efforts of Hasdai ibn Shaprut, vizier and physician to the Spanish caliphs, who wrote a letter to King Joseph of the Khazars.
HISTORY OF THE PROTO-BULGARIANS
This book, translated from Bulgarian into English, chronicles the history and archaeology of the Khazars, Bulgars, North Caucasian Huns, and Alans. There are sections discussing the Khazar cities Sarkel and Balanjar. Includes maps, photographs, footnotes, quotes from historical sources.
OTHER ESSAYS ABOUT THE KHAZARS
Selected essays about Khazar history in English and Russian.
·      Xazarskiy kostyum VII-X vv., by Aleksey (Kutluk) Tselikovskiy - about Khazarian and North Caucasian costumes
·      Novye materialy k probleme izucheniya slavyano-xazarskix otnosheniy (po pamyatnikam Severskogo Dontsa), by V. V. Koloda - about apparent coexistence and synchretism between certain groups of Khazars and Slavs
·      Issledovaniya v Verxnem Saltove v 1996 godu, by V. V. Koloda - discusses Khazarian/Saltovo burials, one of which contained a well-conserved felt boot
·      Krupneyshey punkt (gorod) Khazarii, by A. V. Kryganov - discusses the more than 30 Khazarian cities, some of which (particularly Atil) have not yet been located
·      Xazary, Xazarskiy kaganat - includes Mikhael Gorelik's illustration of Khazar kagan's palace in Atil
·      600 Lyet Vmeste i 50 Lyet Lzhi, by Semyon Charny, in Lekhaim, March 2003
·      V Storonu Khazarii, by Denis Sobolev, in Zhurnal "22" No. 103, pp. 114 ff. - brief history of Khazars
·      Vozvrashchenie v Khazariyu, by Denis Sobolev, in Zhurnal "22" No. 108, pp. 162 ff. - about controversy of descendants of Khazars and origins of Russian Jews


  ========================================================




Here is a non-jewish source, Matt  Johnson,  who does not agree with the positive view on Khazaria:  Podcast about Khazaria. 


The Orthodox Nationalist: Khazaria

July 28, 2011
Svjat I Kyiv
Matt Johnson discusses:
  • The Khazar empire;
  • Khazaria and the Talmud;
  • Khazar economy based on slavery;
  • The reason the Khazars converted to Talmudism;
  • The reasons for the fall of Khazaria;
  • Khazaria and Anti-Christ.
13 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 56 min.


This author describes the Khazars ( with their jewish Kings) as slave traders and parasitic peoples who are superior warriors and have no mercy with the peoples around them.  

=============================================


More well known is Arthur Koestlers book on the Khazars, published in 1976. 
It seems that Dr. Erhan Elhaik 's study confirms and details  Koestlers thesis. 
Amazon: The thirteenth tribe. the Khazar Empire and its heritage.