Sunday, December 10, 2017

676 Coudenhove-Kalergie, Schauble, Peter Sutherland, Avramopoulos, Juncker: de joodse agenda.


Hieronder staan vier invloedrijke mensen die openlijk streefden naar massa-immigratie in Europa:

Coudenhoven-Kalergie: 

Hij ontwikkelde het idee voor een verenigd Europa, waarin landen op economisch en politiek terrein zouden samenwerken. Om dit idee te bevorderen richtte hij in 1922 de Paneuropese Unie op, de oudste Europese eenheidsbeweging. Leden waren onder andere Thomas Mann, Albert Einstein en Konrad Adenauer.


Aanhalingsteken openen
De toekomstige mens zal van gemengd ras zijn. Hedendaagse rassen en klassen zullen geleidelijk verdwijnen als gevolg van ruimte, tijd en het verdwijnen van vooroordelen. Het Euraziatische-negro ras van de toekomst, dat zal lijken op de oude Egyptenaren, vervangt de verscheidenheid van volkeren met een verscheidenheid aan individuen.
Aanhalingsteken sluiten
Video over Koudenhove.     
                                              ------------

Wolfgang Schauble:    (Minister Financien, nu voorzitter Bondsdag)

( Hier een nederlandse samenvatting) 

De machtigste man van Europa vertelt over de politieke agenda die hij al sinds jaar en dag uitvoert. Een agenda van schaamteloze omvolking: Het oude Duitsland en Europa moeten worden opgeheven. Alle grenzen met Afrika en het Midden Oosten moeten open. Schauble voelt zich middelpunt van een enorme revolutie. Het is zijn finest hour.
“Het zijn de schotten die ons kapot maken, en ons door inteelt zullen degenereren. Voor ons zijn de moslims een verrijking van onze openheid en diversiteit.”
Inteelt. Diversiteit. Demografische, biologische termen.
Die termen zijn niet zomaar gekozen. Een van de architecten achter het binnenhalen van meer dan een miljoen moslims naar Duitsland binnen een jaar heeft de verdwijning van het Duitse volk op het oog. Duitsers moet zich niet meer onder elkaar voortplanten. Dat is inteelt. Er is nieuw, vers moslimbloed nodig. Waar Schauble mee bezig is, is een ontzagwekkend eugenetisch programma om het omgekeerde te bereiken wat Hitler wilde bereiken: De vernietiging van het Duitse ras.
                                  -------------------------------
Peter Sutherland.   HIER de BBC over Sutherland.
( 11 jaar baas bij VN afd. Migratie,  20 jaar Goldman Sachs,  4 jaar EU commissaris, 2 jaar baas WTO )  
UN migration chief Peter Sutherland has said that the EU should do its best to undermine the homogeneity of its Member States by encouraging more migration and greater multiculturalism. His view is that migration into the EU has made for 'dynamism and economic growth', although this is sometimes ...( Bron) 

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+WQ+E-2012-007854+0+DOC+XML+V0//NL

Hier de tekst van de vraag van Auke Zijlstra:
Betreft: VN-migratiechef: „EU moet homogeniteit ondermijnen”
 Antwoord(en) 
VN-migratiechef Peter Sutherland heeft gezegd dat de EU haar best zou moeten doen om de homogeniteit van haar lidstaten te ondermijnen door méér migratie en méér multiculturaliteit. Hij is van mening dat migratie in de EU voor „dynamiek en economische groei” zou hebben gezorgd, hoewel dit soms „moeilijk aan de burgers uit te leggen” zou zijn. Lidstaten zouden meer „open” moeten zijn.
1. Is de Commissie bekend met het bericht „EU should „undermine national homogeneity” says UN migration chief”(1)?
2. Is de Commissie het eens of oneens met de uitspraken van Peter Sutherland, en waarom?
3. Deelt de Commissie de mening dat Peter Sutherland zich principieel niet met de migratie van soevereine landen te bemoeien heeft? Is de Commissie derhalve ertoe bereid afstand te nemen van zijn uitspraken? Zo neen, waarom niet?
4. Deelt de Commissie de mening dat het „ondermijnen van de homogeniteit” van een land, waar Peter Sutherland voor pleit, vanuit de optiek van de Unie in strijd is met

—artikel 3, lid 3, alinea 4, VEU: „De Unie eerbiedigt haar rijke verscheidenheid van cultuur en taal en ziet toe op de instandhouding en de ontwikkeling van het Europese culturele erfgoed.” en
—artikel 4, lid 2, zin 1, VEU: „De Unie eerbiedigt de gelijkheid van de lidstaten voor de Verdragen, alsmede hun nationale identiteit die besloten ligt in hun politieke en constitutionele basisstructuren, waaronder die voor regionaal en lokaal zelfbestuur.”,

aangezien hierdoor onder andere 's lands eigen cultuur en nationale identiteit verloren dreigen te gaan? Zo ja, is de Commissie voornemens uit te spreken dat Peter Sutherlands uitspraken niet stroken met de visie van de Unie? Zo neen, hoe verdedigt de Commissie Peter Sutherlands uitspraken in het licht van bovengenoemde artikelen?

https://nationalvanguard.org/2016/09/the-jews-enforcer-peter-sutherland/

Juncker, voorzitter EU:    ( nov. 2017) 
Zonder immigranten uit Afrika is de EU (-industrie) verloren.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/11/28/eu-president-without-millions-african-migrants-europe-lody/
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/juncker-borders-are-worst-of-inventions-5rgw9kb33
Een Euro commisaris voor migratie werd in een dec. 2017 artikel in Politico geciteerd:
 At the end of the day, we all need to be ready to accept migration, mobility and diversity as the new norm and tailor our policies accordingly. The only way to make our asylum and migration policies future-proof, is to collectively change our way of thinking first.
--
Dimitris Avramopoulos is European commissioner for migration, home affairs and citizenship.

675 Doping. Rodchenkov. TUE. Fancy Bears

UPDATE: juli 2020: Der Spiegel twijfelt nu aan Rodchenko. 
Artikel op  RT heb ik helemaal onderaan geplakt.  Der Spiegel zelf zit achter een betaalmuur.
====

Ik zie een uitzending op RT ( In the now, 13.30-15 uur) en hoor voor het eerst over TUE's. 

Het blijkt dat atleten allerlei middelen kunnen gebruiken zolang een arts het voor schrijft voor hun gezondheid en  hen een TUE geeft, een Temporary Use Exemption.

Deze TUE's worden geheim gehouden. 

EenRussische hackersgroep heeft achterhaald wie er allemaal TUE's gebruiken.

Dan blijkt dat mensen met bronchitis de beste topsporters zijn: 75% van de medailles in skisporten zijn in handen van Noren die zware bronchitis hebben.

Voor het vrouwentennis kan het heel nuttig zijn om veel medische klachten te hebben:  Serena en Venus Williams hadden 16 middelen middels TUE's gebruikt. 





--========================

Hieronder nog een oud artikeltje dat ik een jaar geleden schreef, over de nu weer actuele Rodschenko: 

Hier de oorspronkelijke docu, vanaf min 30, waar Stepanov zegt dat Rodchenko de man was die de doping verkocht aan hem:  https://youtu.be/iu9B-ty9JCY?t=1786  

Hier een artikeltje dat ik 1,5 jaar geleden maakte, en waaruit blijkt dat Rodchenkov geen goede bron is: 

We weten allemaal dat sportdoping ook sterk aan Rusland wordt gekoppeld, terwijl het in bijna alle landen voorkomt, en op veel plaatsen expres niet wordt ontdekt. Ook in Amerika. Zie de foto van Serena Williams. Denk aan Lance Armstrong die pas werd beschuldigd toen zijn ex ploegmaats een voor een de waarheid hadden verteld en er geen houden meer aan was. 

De duitser Hajo Seppelt heeft zich gespecialiseerd in het opsporen van doping in landen die gebasht moeten worden: Rusland, China, Wit Rusland. 
Youtube, 58 min: Geheimsache Doping: "Wie Russland seine Sieger macht" - Doku Sportschau ARD 2014
Zijn docu over Rusland kreeg veel aandacht. 
In de docu zien we een aantal Russische sporters die zeggen dat ze doping gebruikten, en dat ze alleen naar het buitenland mochten na een controle-meting ( of alle sporen uit het bloed waren). Slechte presteerders kregen geen doping meer. Van goede presteerders werden de doping- monsters vervalst zodat ze niet betrapt werden. 
Niet fraai allemaal, maar in de Tour de France ging het decennia lang zo. En in de MBA in Amerika ook, naar het schijnt. 
Opmerkelijke zaken:
1) de hoofdgetuige, een jonge Rus, Vitaly Stepanov, heeft in Amerika gestudeerd en werd daarna doping-controleur in Rusland. Hij huwde een atlete die doping gebruikte en was enkele jaren lang dus zelf zwaar in de fout. 
2) De artsen die de doping verstrekken verdienen flink aan hun werk. Als er medailles worden behaald, moeten de atleten flink betalen aan de artsen of coaches. Een marathonloopster had in totaal 450.000 $ betaald aan een Russisch lid van de Internationale Atletiek Federatie. ( Blijkbaar is het IAF ook corrupt.) 
3) De man die nu als enige getuige voor McLaren op treedt, Grygory Rotshenkowa , komt ook al in de video voor, op minuut 31. Daar wordt hij door de sporters als een belangrijke doping-verstrekkende arts afgebeeld. Tegen Hajo Seppelt ontkent Rotshenkowa elke aanklacht. En deze man is nu kroongetuige en de man die vertrouwd wordt op zijn woord? Op zijn gezag wil men de kroon op de carriere ( Olympische spelen) van vele tientallen atleten kapot maken? 
4) Op 33.23 min zegt Seppelt: “Opmerkelijk. Drie jaar eerder werd Rotschenko er van verdacht dat hij in doping handelde. Maar de staat vervolgde de aanklacht tegen zijn eigen medewerker ( Rotshenkowa) niet verder. “
Ik begrijp hieruit dat R. wel een tijd lang is onderzocht. 
Als dat onderzoek stopt kan dat twee oorzaken hebben:
- Men kan het bewijs niet rond krijgen. 
- Of er zijn machtige lieden die willen dat alles bij het oude blijft. 

De crux van de aanklacht die nu tegen Rusland loopt is dat de Russische staat zelf medeplichtig is aan het doping gebruik, en dat dus alle Russische sporters verdacht zijn. 
Stel dat dit zo is, 
- Zou de staat dan toestaan dat die artsen enorme kapitalen afpersen van de atleten? 
- Zou de staat dan een onderzoek beginnen tegen een van de belangrijkste doping-leveranciers ( Rotschenkowa)? 

Ik zie echt niet hoe de Russische Staat fouter zou zijn dan de Franse Staat of dan de Amerikaanse overheid.




-==================================================

Putin heeft gereageerd op de uitsluiting van Rusland als deelnemend land aan de Winter Olympics in Zuid Korea: 


Putin: 
"" First, we must admit that we are partly to blame for this, because we gave cause for it.

But I think that while there was cause, it was not handled in an honest way, to put it mildly. Why? Because, firstly, this is collective responsibility. Collective liability for offenses is not envisaged in any legal system in the world. This is my first point.

Secondly, most of the charges are based on allegations that are not proven and are largely unfounded. They are based mainly on the testimony of one person, whose morals and ethics and mental state raise a lot of questions. There is nothing else.

What is important? It is important that the commission concluded that there was no system of state support for doping in Russia. This is an important conclusion. But if this is so, then the question arises: why are our Olympians prohibited from competing under the Russian flag and Russian symbols, if there is no state support? Punish those who are to blame. And, secondly, if there is no state support for doping, then why cannot they compete under our national symbols? This, of course, is a big question.""

Het hele artikel staat ook hier: http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/56323

Putin zegt dat er dus wel een vorm van Russische schuld is. ben erg beniewud wat ie hier mee bedoelt. 
In het gunstigste geval bedoelt hij: 'We hebben Rodschenko eerder zelf aangeklaagd, maar hem toch weer terug zijn job gegeven ( of vrij gesproken) , en dat hadden we nooit mogen doen.'

Of bekent hij dat er inderdaad doping is gebruikt door atleten, en dat er dus toch onvoldoende toezicht was? 

Of bedoelt hij: 'We hebben een oogje toe geknepen t a v Rodchenko en hem zijn gang laten gaan.'


 ========================

https://deutsch.rt.com/international/104188-doch-kein-russisches-staatsdoping-spiegel/

International
Doch kein "russisches Staatsdoping"? Der Spiegel zweifelt am angeblichen Whistleblower
6.07.2020 • 15:00 Uhr
Doch kein "russisches Staatsdoping"? Der Spiegel zweifelt am angeblichen Whistleblower
Quelle: Reuters © / Rosa Khutor
Nun auch für den Spiegel eher Opfer als Täter: Olga Saizewa bei der Biathlon-Staffel in Sotschi im Februar 2014
1772
Folge uns aufRT
Gab es während der Olympiade in Sotschi ein staatlich unterstütztes russisches Dopingsystem? Natürlich, meint der mediale Mainstream, doch nun meldet ausgerechnet "Der Spiegel" Zweifel an der Glaubwürdigkeit des "Whistleblowers" an, auf dessen Aussagen die Vorwürfe beruhen.
Im Sportteil der aktuellen Ausgabe des Hamburger Magazins Der Spiegel findet sich ein interessanter Artikel, der die gängige Darstellung des westlichen Mainstreams zum angeblichen systematischen russischen Staatsdoping bei den olympischen Winterspielen in Sotschi 2014 infrage stellt.

Konkret äußert der Artikel des Sportredakteurs Thilo Neumann Zweifel an der Glaubwürdigkeit des angeblichen Whistleblowers Grigorij Rodtschenkow. Rodtschenkow, früherer Leiter des Moskauer Dopingkontrolllabors, hatte sich in die USA abgesetzt und dort in einem Interview mit der New York Times von einem staatlich unterstützten Dopingsystem in Sotschi berichtet, mit dem während der Olympiade belastete Dopingproben russischer Sportler gegen unbelastete Proben ausgetauscht worden seien.
Der Artikel lässt zunächst ausführlich und wohlwollend die frühere russische Biathletin Olga Saizewa zu Wort kommen. Saizewa wurde nach Ende ihrer Laufbahn wegen ihrer angeblichen Teilnahme am angeblichen Dopingsystem in Sotschi lebenslang vom Internationalen Olympischen Komitee (IOC) gesperrt. Diese Entscheidung ficht die Russin, die ihre Unschuld beteuert, mit weiteren Sportlerinnen vor dem Sportgerichtshof CAS in Lausanne an. In New York verklagen die Sportlerinnen Rodtschenkow darüber hinaus auf Schadenersatz.
Dann erklärt der Autor, sein Magazin habe Prozessakten einsehen können, die die Aussage der Biathletin stützten, dafür aber an Rodtschenkows Darstellung zweifeln. Wörtlich heißt es:
Mehrere Beweismittel der Schweizer Prozessakte, die der Spiegel in den vergangenen Wochen einsehen konnte, stützen nicht nur Saizewas Unschuld. Sie werfen auch die Frage auf, wie glaubhaft die Aufarbeitung des Sotschi-Komplotts wirklich war. Ob man womöglich dem Whistleblower des Skandals allzu sehr geglaubt hat.
Der Spiegel-Artikel betont zwar, dass russische Sportler jahrelang manipuliert hätten, und spricht von "Finten aus Moskau" bei der Aufarbeitung des Skandals. Dennoch gelangt er zu dem Schluss, dass die Ermittlungen der Weltantidopingagentur Wada und die Entscheidungen des IOC sich auf eine Indizienkette stützten, vor allem auf die Aussagen Rodtschenkows, die Saizewa als "Fantasiegeschichte" bezeichnet. Auch den bayerischen Trainer der Biathletin lässt das Magazin zu Wort kommen. Er bezeichnet die Berichte des "Whistleblowers" über einen Dopingcocktail als "totalen Schmarrn".

Der Spiegel verweist auch auf eine weitere Dimension des Falles. Inspiriert von den Aussagen des angeblichen Whistleblowers wurde in den USA ein Gesetzentwurf auf den Weg gebracht. Der "Rodchenkov Act" sieht vor, dass US-amerikanische Behörden Doping international als Straftat verfolgen können. Die Ironie dieses Vorhabens, das offenbar auch darauf abzielt, die USA unabhängiger von der Wada zu machen, fällt selbst dem Spiegel-Redakteur ins Auge:
Die USA als globale Dopingpolizei, initiiert durch Rodtschenkows Geschichte? Das klingt ziemlich abenteuerlich, weil die Vereinigten Staaten selbst oft genug weggesehen haben, wenn Athleten des eigenen Landes unter Verdacht standen.
Der Spiegel-Artikel ist bemerkenswert, weil sich das unter schwindender Nachfrage leidende Magazin mit ihm dezidiert vom westlichen Mainstream absetzt, der Rodtschenkow – wie der Spiegel bislang selbst – als tapferen Whistleblower feiert und seinen Aussagen zum russischen Dopingsystem folgt.
Diese Wende ist nicht der erste Ausbruch des Magazins aus der medialen Anti-Russland-Phalanx des Mainstreams. Im November 2019 hatte ein Artikel im Wirtschaftsteil des Spiegel die Darstellung des Falles Sergei Magnitski im westlichen Mainstream zerpflückt und kaum einen Zweifel daran gelassen, dass die auf den Investor Bill Browder zurückgehende Erzählung von dem gewaltsamen Tod des Wirtschaftsprüfers in einem russischen Gefängnis auf Lügen beruht.



Saturday, December 09, 2017

674 Hoe Amerika een privé leger is voor Israel, en haar inwoners slaven zijn.

Acute Zionist Infestation - Causing Misery Everywhere


"Western societies have been infected by an insidious flesh eating bug, a blood sucking tick that spreads a bigoted and elitist disease that will eventually destroy us all."

“Average Joe,” who’s an American veteran down on his luck, could have begun his own landscaping or mechanic business when hard times came. Only Uncle Sam was too broken to gift good old Joe $30,000 or so to get things rolling.
It’s too bad, because Joe got a bronze star and lost a leg over there in Iraq. If Joe’s family only knew how Zionist, pig bankers had cost millions of Americans an alternative future, then maybe we’d all stand a better chance of life and liberty. But, they don’t know yet.
For a couple of years now I’ve laid awake nights trying to figure out how to convey to my countrymen the catastrophic abuse of power leveraged by Israel’s Washington-based henchmen. At first, I was like most people, worried friends and enemies alike might call me an “anti-Semite” for the insinuation of Zionist lobby skullduggery.
Then, a murdered and sodomized Libyan leader made fun of by a presidential candidate, and a few tens of thousands of dead kids over there in Syria, Yemen, and in Gaza, and some more in Yemen, all caused me not to give a damn what people label me as. But wait, what about my Jewish friends? What would they think if I jumped feet first into Bibi Netanyahu and his AIPAC vampires?
advertisement
Alas, my Jewish pals mostly got fed up too, at envisioning the bitter end of an abusive Israeli regime. None of them want a Hitler “final solution” on a global scale. And that’s where Tel Aviv is headed in my opinion. Seeing Netanyahu dangle US President Donald Trump like a wooden puppet in front of a live audience – well, the jig is up for most sane people, I think.
Realizing just how dastardly these Israeli (Zion Israel that is) interests are, that’s what spurred me to find the “Average Joe” quotient! The slap across the face that hopefully wakes some Americans the hell up.
The All-American Hobo
Let’s profile our All-American Joe here. He's just like most of the rest of us, you know? Joe loves his country, his neighbors, and he adores all the legends of freedom and liberty, and especially the red-white-and-blue dream, remember he’s a vet, too. Even though his future got shattered and stagnated a bit while serving in the US Army, Joe lives in the same information bubble as the rest of us.

He’s wrapped up tight by CNN, Hollywood, the New York Times, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Once a week, Joe goes to the unemployment office, just like he’s told. Unable to get an even break, he does the house chores while his wife works at Burger King flipping Whoppers with cheese. Good old Joe sometimes has to go to the pawn shop to unload something of value, something worth less than a grocery store visit to buy Cheerios for his little kids. Yeah, you get the picture now. I am hammering like hell on your sense of brotherhood, community, and civic pride in war heroes. You bet I am. Because I know most of you fail to care anymore. I know most of you are contented in that little bubble of existence. But, suck it up and read on. This is the reality of your apathetic and lazy patriotism – Average Joe is your next-door neighbor. And Average Joe should not be contemplating blowing his brains out – but you let Joe down – we let Joe down – Washington caused Joe to consider blowing his goddamned brains out, because we collectively turned a blind eye. We populated the halls of power in our country with liars, cheats, criminals, and the puppets of evil men, and of evil nations.
Now let me educate all the past, present, and future “American Joes” out there. Just so you know what has been happening while you slept.
While I’ve no space here to discuss properly what’s known as the “Movement for Greater Israel,” it’s important that the reader grasp the ultimate goal of new and old Zionists (see a moderate Zionism definition here). What this group wants is nothing short of the reestablishment of King David’s Empire, which encompassed all of the so-called “Mandate Palestine, the British Mandate of Palestine and British Palestine” plus Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and Iraq, as well as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, Oman, Yemen, most of Turkey, and all the land east of the Nile river. Granted, this is an ambitious plan that is hard for “Joe” to grasp, but any reader can watch the news and put two-plus-two together. If Joe can accept my assertion here, then I am sure he will better understand why he is in such a fix. But let’s move on to examine the Zionist plan, stumbling blocks, and progress so far. Yes, of course, that is if this plan actually exists.
There are only two big problems with creating this great big land of “Greater Israel”. First, there are one hell of a lot of Arabs in the way. Second, getting those Arabs the hell out of the way is costing Americans and the rest of the world an unbelievable price. On the first point, the proxy militaries of Zion and America are rapidly subtracting Arabs from King David’s former territory. Those that cannot be cluster bombed, beheaded, shot, blasted, or otherwise butchered are simply starved to death or die of disease. The rest will probably move to Europe if the lobbies there work hard enough, and if not, America has lots of free land left. And this brings us to our main point, how AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and hundreds of other supporters of Netanyahu’s dreams of empire robbed poor heroic Joe of his future.
The Zionist Dream
Now, you’ll recall I said that all our hero Joe needed was a small grant to rev up his business. Most of you reading this probably have better math skills than me, so please try and divide and subtract or multiply some numbers here. According to the most recent figures from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (which are always WAY conservative), there were 453,000 jobless veterans as of 2016. So, let’s focus on these “GI Joes and Janes” for a moment. For an initial instance, let’s assume that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, Arab Spring, and the Ukraine mess are not for the benefit of “Greater Israel”.
Let’s just do some math with the massive funding through tax breaks and donations for Israel’s defense industry, the IDF, and gigantic weapons loans from the US that never get paid back. Let’s pretend Americans care more about “Joe” and less about genetically pure Israelis (more on this in a later post). For the moment, let’s forget the $9 billion dollar trade deficit the US has with Israel, and focus on the $38 billion US Senator Lindsey Graham and others approved for Israeli defense recently.
$38 billion dollars divided by 453,000 out of work vets, that’s $83,885.21 rounded to the nearest cent for each-and-every GI Joe or Jane out there. But I know it will take some IMPACT here for readers to share this with ALL their Average Joe friends out there. Let me spell this out. No funds for the IDF to blast Palestinians to smithereens – 453,000 new businesses and zero unemployment for down and out vets.
Yes, Utopia, I know. But let’s continue, because this is just the chump change the Zionists levy from us. I won’t break down the private funding direct to the IDF. I will not harp about the star-studded galas and auctions Hollywood and high society hold to shower gifts of “BILLIONS” on Israel. Read this article and discover those. Now, it’s time to return to the big picture, and to the role of Zionists in the wider world’s affairs. Let’s assume logically that the enemies of Israel, especially Arab nations, were the real cause for the so-called “war on terror” initiated after the 9/11 attacks by then US President George W. Bush.
Most of you readers understand I am not the first analyst or journalists to presume Israel and the Zionists have been behind recent wars. And I am not just talking about admitted anti-Semites like Louis Farrakhan, who always called the Twin Towers attacks a false flag operation. Forget wild-eyed conspiracy theories for the moment, and instead look at evidence inside books like “The Zionist War on Terror Creates More Terror”, by Christopher Bollyn. A short excerpt from Bollyn serves to set the stage for my last assertion here:
“As long as Western governments and societies allow themselves to be deceived about the true nature of terrorism, the “War on Terror” and the threat it is meant to eradicate will only get worse.  For our political leaders and media to go along with false-flag deceptions and to flail away at phantoms is to ensure that the “War on Terror” will go on for a very long time.  The only way to liberate ourselves and our nations from this madness is to expose the true source of terrorism.”
Without bombarding you with 9/11 theories and anti-Israel rhetoric, it’s completely fair to say hard liner Zionists in Israel, America, and across Europe have played a major role in brewing conflicts in the Middle East. If we can admit that Greater Israel is part of this chaotic stew of destruction, then it is far easier to show “Average Joes” everywhere just what the costs of American and Israeli policies is. For the sake of this argument, here are some even more amazing “if” figures.
Since the so-called “War on Terror” was launched, experts claim that the United States has squandered between $3.2 and upwards of $5 trillion dollars. I think it’s fair to assume that it’s costs Americans more than $4 trillion since 2003, so let me run with this figure.
I Want My 80 Grand Back!
Yesterday I was on hold with the Social Security Administration for 47 minutes on an international call to solve my initial retirement payments. While I waited, the robot in charge of held calls kept telling me, “We provide benefits to over 50 million Americans, so there are very busy times. We are sorry for your long wait.” At that moment, this article was on my mind. I thought to myself over and over, “fifty million, fifty million into $4 trillion or so?” As I type this I am recalling over 40 years of hard work. I’m thinking about my fellow 50 million countrymen, and all the hard work I saw those “Average Joes” doing over the decades.
And I am thinking about the $900 bucks a month my early retirement (63 instead of 65) gets me. I think I am “Average Joe” perhaps, and I am thinking $4,000,000,000,000.00 divided by 50 million. What is that figure? Wow, it comes out to $80,000 dollars! Now let me frame (or hammer) this in.
Without a war to destroy all of Israel’s neighbors and enemies (in my scenario) the people still alive who helped build and fuel the American dream could EACH have a lump sum payment of 80 grand! Eighty thousand dollars, what could the average retired person do – buy a small house – never pay rent again – get that eye surgery so desperately needed – live a little bit longer or more comfortably – survive instead of subsist!
I am now thinking about an aged couple I know back home in South Carolina, and about the cat food I once caught them eating a couple of days before their US Treasury checks arrived. I’m thinking about my US veteran retired friend, who has to go to the VA to be treated like an animal.
I am thinking about my own $900 dollars and how I will make due abroad, with no medical insurance except what my wife can pay for. Peace and $80,000 for America’s retired “Average Joe or Joanne” – or perpetual war until Greater Israel is established. Until the Syrians are killed or run out of the coming “Northern Jerusalem Empire”….. Take note folks, Americans got ZERO from these lost wars.
This is harsh, I know. It seems a bit conspiracy theoretical too, I understand. But after three or four years of research and analysis, and roughly twelve to fourteen hours a day hard at it, I’ve made my diagnosis. If killing and chaos, if the economic warfare and crookedness of our political processes are the illness, then rampant Zionism is the contagion.
From my perspective, Western societies have been literally infected by an insidious flesh-eating bug, a bloodsucking tick that spreads a bigoted and elitist disease that will eventually destroy us all. Like the small, seemingly harmless little tick, the animal driving American policy breeds more animals in the blood it extracts from its host. And you think my seemly affront to Zionism dastardly or inappropriate?
Then go and do your own pathology work. Look the patient in his eyes, check his pulse, listen to that frail heartbeat, see his suffering, and try and cure humanity yourself. All I know is, “Average Joe” has not even been made aware of the parasite that has cost him everything.
How’s that for a wakeup call, Joe?

673 Brief van de Russische Patriarch aan Lenin in 1918.

In nov 1918 was de Russische Revolutie 1 jaar aan de gang. 
Uit deze brief van de Russische Patriarch ( de hoogste priester in de Orthodoxe kerk, meen ik) zien we dat alle info die we al kennen van filosoof Bertrand Russell, Ambassadeur Oudendijke, Winston Churchill, journalist Wilton, dominee Stimson en anderen ( BLOG)  worden bevestigd:  Het zijn joden die de Revolutie pleegden. Ze zijn barbaars in hun optreden. Priesters en burgers worden om niets geexecuteerd.  Het is totaal ongehoord, en onvoorstelbar dat heel erg weinig mensen dit weten. 
Let op de gelijkenis met Guantanamo, waar ook mensen lukraak werden opgepakt en werden beschuldigd zonder enige reden. 
Er zijn in de brief meer alarmerende passages. Waarschuwingen voor het lot van onze kinderen.

Patriarch Tikhon was head of the Russian church during the revolution, and courageously condemned what he saw as a demonic attack on a Christian civilization. Previously he had been a bishop in the US, from 1898 - 1907, where he was a very successful missionary.
The first Bolshevik government, which consisted mostly of atheist Jews, tolerated the popular Patriarch for a while, realizing that if they martyred him, it would only increase the church's influence, but eventually, they pushed him out, put him under house arrest, and demonized and harassed him until his death in 1925. The Russian church made him into a saint in 1989.
This remarkable letter survives as a testimony of what was really happening in Russia at the time, and to the extraordinary courage of this man to speak the truth, knowing it would cost him his life.
It is all the more important because the accounts to the West that came out of Russia at the time, and subsequent histories, were mostly written by left-leaning sympathizers who cheered the revolution on, having little idea what it really was. This obfuscation continues to this day.
Take a few minutes to read this passionate and poetic condemnation of evil. Its startling clarity comes down to us through the years with great force. We highlighted a few of the more moving lines, but honestly, almost every sentence is gripping.
This view of what actually happened during the revolution is as important today as it was 100 years ago. The 100-year commemoration of the Russian revolution shows starkly divergent views of what it was to our own day. 
This excellent translation is by Nun Cornelia Rees.




We address this prophecy of the Savior to you, the current makers of our Fatherland’s fate, who call yourself “the people’s” commissars.
For an entire year, you have been gripping the power of the government in your hands, and you are already preparing to celebrate the anniversary of the October revolution; but the rivers of the blood of our brothers, pitilessly murdered at your rallying, cry out to heaven and force us to tell you the bitter truth.

Having seized power and called the people to entrust themselves to you, what promises have you given them, and how have you kept these promises?
Truly you have given them a stone instead of bread, and a serpent instead of a fish (cf. Matt. 7:9-10). To a people worn out by a bloody war you promised to give peace “without annexation or contribution.”
What victory could you have turned down, you who have led Russia to a shameful truce, with humiliating conditions that even you did not resolve to make fully public? Instead of “annexations and contributions” the great Motherland is conquered, diminished, dismembered; and as pay for the tribute placed on it you secretly transport to Germany gold that you yourself did not amass.
You have taken away from the soldiers everything for which they had valorously fought. You have taught them, only recently brave and invincible, to leave off protecting the Motherland and to run from the field of battle.
You have extinguished in their hearts the inspiring consciousness that there is no greater love than should one lay down his life for his friends (Jn. 15:13).
You have traded the Fatherland for soulless internationalism, although you yourselves know perfectly well that when it comes to defending the Fatherland, the proletarians of all countries are those countries’ faithful sons, and not their betrayers.
And although you have refused to protect the Motherland from external enemies, you are ceaselessly gathering armies.
Against whom will you lead them?
You have divided the entire nation into warring camps and cast it into a fratricide unprecedented for its cruelty.
You have openly exchanged love of Christ for hatred, and instead of peace, you have artificially fomented enmity between the classes. And there is no end in sight to the war you’ve generated, since you aim to deliver triumph to the phantom of world revolution with the hands of Russian worker and peasants.
It was not Russia who needed the disgraceful peace with its external enemy but you yourselves, who have plotted to irreparably destroy Russia’s internal peace.
No one feels safe; everyone lives in constant fear of searches, robbery, eviction, arrest, and execution.
Hundreds of defenseless people are seized, then languish for whole months in prisons, are often executed without investigation or trial, even without going to the court you have simplified.
Not only those who are somehow guilty before you, but even those who are in no way guilty, but were taken only as “captives”—these unfortunate people are killed to answer for crimes committed by persons who not only are not of one mind with them, but very often your own followers or those with convictions similar to yours.
Bishops, priests, monks and nuns who are guilty of nothing are executed simply because of some wild accusations of vague and indeterminate “counterrevolution.” This inhuman execution is made even more onerous for the Orthodox because they are deprived of the final consolation before their deaths—the Sacraments—and the bodies of the slain are not given to their families for a Christian burial.
Isn’t this the height of aimless cruelty on the part of those who pretend to be the benefactors of mankind and who themselves supposedly suffered from cruel rulers?
But it’s not enough for you that you have reddened the hands of the Russian people with their brothers' blood; hiding behind various names—contributions, requisitions, and nationalization—you have pushed them into the most barefaced and wanton thievery.
At your hinting were plundered or seized lands, mansions, factories, houses, farm animals, money, personal things, furniture, clothing.
First the wealthy, whom you’ve called “bourgeois,” were robbed; then under the epithet of “kulaks” the more well-off and industrious peasants were also plundered, thus increasing the number of paupers—although you cannot but recognize that with the impoverishment of a great multitude of individual citizens, the wealth of the nation as a whole is lost, and the country is impoverished.
Tempting uneducated and ignorant people with the opportunity for easy and unpunished gain, you have fogged their consciences and muffled in them the awareness of sin; but no matter what names you hide this evil-doing behind, murder, violence, and robbery will ever remain serious sins and crimes that cry out to heaven.
You promised freedom.
Freedom is a great good, if it is properly understood—like freedom from evil, not oppressing others, not turning into lawlessness and willfulness.
But you have not given that freedom; the freedom you have given consists in all manner of indulgence to the lowest crowd instincts, in murder and theft with impunity. All manifestations of both truly the civilian and higher spiritual freedom of mankind you have mercilessly crushed.
Is it freedom when no one can bring home food or rent an apartment without special permission, when families, and sometimes all the inhabitants of whole buildings are evicted and their possessions are thrown into the street, and when citizens are artificially divided into ranks, certain of which are consigned to hunger and being plundered?
Is it freedom when no one can speak his opinion openly without fear of being accused of counterrevolution?
Where is freedom of speech and press, where is freedom for preaching in church?
Many bold preachers have already paid with their martyrs’ blood; the voice of social and governmental discussion and criticism is being stifled; all press, other than the narrow Bolshevik press, has been completely strangled.
Especially painful and cruel is the violation of freedom in matters of faith.
Not a day goes by when the most monstrous slanders against Christ’s Church and her servants are not published in the agencies of your press, along with malicious blasphemy and mockery. You deride the servants of the altar, force bishops to dig trenches, and send priests to do dirty work. You have raised your hand against the Church’s inheritance gathered through many generations of the faithful, and have given no thought to violating their posthumous will.
You have closed a large number of monasteries and churches without any excuse or reason. You have blocked access to the Moscow Kremlin—that sacred inheritance of the faithful people. You are destroying the ancient form of church community—the parish; you destroy brotherhoods and other charitable and educational Church institutions, close and rout diocesan meetings, and interfere with the Orthodox Church’s internal government.
By banishing sacred images from schools and forbidding the teaching of faith to children there, you deprive them of the spiritual food necessary for an Orthodox upbringing.
What else can I say? The time fails me (Heb. 11:32) to describe all the catastrophes that have stricken our Motherland.
I will not speak of the collapse of a once great and mighty Russia, of the total fracturing of our railroad, of unprecedented agricultural devastation, of hunger and cold that threatens death in the cities, and of the lack of everything needed for maintaining a household in the villages. This everyone can see.
Yes, we are experiencing terrible times in our reign, and it will not be erased from the peoples’ soul for a long time, having darkened the image of God in it and stamping in it the image of the beast. The words of the prophet have been fulfilled: 
Their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed innocent blood: their thoughts are thoughts of iniquity; wasting and destruction are in their paths. (Is. 59:7).
We know that our rebukes will evoke only anger and indignation in you and that you will look for an excuse in them for accusing us of opposition to the authorities, but the higher your “column of wrath” rises, the more proven will be the testimony to the truth of our rebukes.
It is not our business to judge earthly authorities; all authority, allowed by God, would attract our blessing if it were truly “God’s servant” for the good of its subjects, and not a terror to good works, but to the evil (Rom. 13:3).
Now to you, who are using your authority to persecute your neighbors and decimate the innocent, we extend our word of instruction: celebrate the anniversary of your coming to power by freeing the prisoners, putting a stop to the bloodshed, violence, devastation, and persecution of faith; turn not to destruction but to the establishment of law and order, give the people their desired and deserved rest from civil war.
Otherwise, all the righteous blood you have spilled will be required of you (cf. Lk. 11:50), and you who took sword in hand will yourselves die of the sword (cf. Matt. 26:52).
November 7, 1918
=====

Bijna 2 jaar later was Bertrand Russellin St Petersburg, en trof daar nog preciues dezelfde personen en ellende aan:

Bertrand Russell , in zijn autobiografie, pag. 354. Brief  25 juni 1920:

 “Bolshevism is a close tyrannical bureaucracy, with a spy system more elaborate and terrible than the Tsar's, and an aristocracy as insolent and unfeeling, composed of Americanised Jews. No vestige of liberty remains, in thought or speech or action.”

Monday, December 04, 2017

672 Wie veroorzaakte de radicale Islam?

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Secret-Affairs-Britains-Collusion-Radical/dp/1846687640