Sunday, September 04, 2016

553 Een lijst met verboden boeken en 'gevaarlijke' websites.

Er is een site van mensen die zich openlijk anti-joods noemen.

Van die site heb ik onderstaande lijsten gecopieerd:

List of Forbidden Books: Key Texts For Political Pariahs and Thought Criminals

 Admin   Other Writers, Recommended Reading
DISCLAIMER :  The administrators of this site have no idea what is contained in the texts below, having never had the time and opportunity to read more than a mere handful of the books and articles mentioned. A quick glance at the titles, however, will reveal that few of these texts are likely to meet with the approval of the court historians and promoters of political correctness. We publish this list, forwarded to us by an unknown correspondent, simply as a bibliography of taboo political texts which some of our readers might find helpful for reference purposes as they pursue their various lines of research. (LD)
ADDENDUM: The same correspondent has just sent us a long LIST OF RECOMMENDED WEBSITES. This has been added at the end in the form of two appendices. We hope you find this comprehensive list useful.   

TOP SITE:  http://www.jrbooksonline.com

Additional files are at these pages:
VARIOUS ADDED 2009 PDF BOOKS and articles (#1)    0 thru 9 and A thru E
VARIOUS ADDED 2009 PDF BOOKS and articles (#2)    F thru Q
VARIOUS ADDED 2009 PDF BOOKS and articles (#3)    R thru Z
VARIOUS ADDED 2009 PDF BOOKS and articles (#4)    One big list, A thru Z
(Each less than 6MB except where noted)
America’s Decline
by Revilo P. Oliver (23MB)  
“Ancient Germans”
(Extract from A Genealogical Table and History of the Springer Family)by M.C. Springer, 1881.
Andrew MacDonald – Hunter
Another version below under “Hunter”
Andrew MacDonald – Turner Diaries
Another version below under “Turner Diaries”
Animal Farm
by George Orwell)
Antichrist
by Friedrich Nietzsche,
1895 trans. by Mencken, 1920)
Beast as Saint
(Michael “Martin Luther” King expose)
Behind Communism
by Frank L. Britton
Beria
(1-page ad from the National Alliance)
Best of Attack and National Vanguard
National Alliance, 1984.  (63MB)
Big Book of Racialism  (DOC file)
Blood and Soil
by Anna Bramwell, 1985.
A sympathetic study of Richard Walter Darre, the Nazi Agriculture Minister.
Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin, Swedish translation
UPDATED 4/3/14; correction 5/11/14
Book of the Dead  (26.4MB)
British Army and Jewish Insurgency in Palestine, 1945-7
by David A. Charles:                
Front matter
Chaps. 1-2
Chaps. 3-4
Chaps. 5-6 with App. I, II and III
End matter (App. IV, V, Notes and Bibliog.)
Index
British Guardian  (9/1924, pub. by The Britons)
British Guardian  (1/9/1925, pub. by The Britons)
Churchill’s Secret War
by Madhusree Mukerjee
(Churchill’s role in the Bengal famine of the 1940s,
which reportedly claimed the lives of 2-3 million Indians)
Civil War Two
by Thomas W. Chittum)
Curse of Canaan
by Eustace Mullins
Death of a City
by Michael McLaughlin)
Design of the Universe
by Fritz Kahn, 1954   (40.5MB)
Enemy of Europe
by Francis Parker Yockey
Enemy of Our Enemies
by Dr. Revilo P. Oliver
Ezra Pound Speaking
(Transcription of 120 speeches)               
Facts in the Case
by Gov. Alfred E. Smith
FBI MCSOT Terrorist Flyer: FRONT BACK
For My Legionaires
by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
Germany’s Hitler
by Heinz A. Heinz (11MB)
Gothic Ripples  (2/1988)
Guide for the Bedevilled
by Ben Hecht. This one has to be read to be believed. Typical Jewish schizophrenia.)
Hitler’s Secret Backers
by Sidney Warburg                                  
Holy Book of Adolf Hitler
by James Larratt Battersby, 1952
Imperium
by Francis Parker Yockey; Intro by Prof. Oliver)
Inside Story of the Peace Conference
by Dr. E.J. Dillon, 1920.  (24.3MB)
Jew as Criminal 
by Keller and Andersen, 1937; intro by Streicher.
Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel
by Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky          
Jewish Strategy
by Revilo P. Oliver   
Jewish Religion and Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling)
[ HTML hot-linked version ]   [ regular text PDF ]
Jews
by Hilaire Belloc, 1922
Jews and Their Lies
by Martin Luther
Johannes Buxtorf : Ch. 36 of The Jewish Synagogue on the Messiah from a 1657 English edition (with facsimiles)
Judaism in Music
by Richard Wagner
Judea Declares War on Germany
(Barnes Review 2001)
“Kill the Best Gentiles!”
by James W. von Brunn, 2002                        
Killing Kennedy
by Dr. Revilo P. Oliver
Lectures on the Holocaust
by Germar Rudolf  (13.8MB)
Leif Eriksson  (German)
Life in the Third Reich
(A speech by Friedrich Kurreck)
Made in Russia – the Holocaust  by Carlos Porter  (18.3MB)
Better quality version is in HTML at the CWPorter Mirror (two2.htm)
Magna Carta
(This version has the Jew clauses, later redacted)
McCarthy and his Enemies
by William F. Buckley, Jr.  (21.8MB)
Mein Kampf
by Adolf Hitler
Murder of Little Mary Phagan
by Mary Phagan [grandniece], 1987.
Facsimiles as a PDF file (15MB)
Nameless War
by A. H. M. Ramsay.(The author was later imprisoned for his views)
New History of the Jews
by Eustace Mullins (NEW) 
New Order of Barbarians
(tape transcriptions, Lawrence Dunegan and Randy Engel)
New Unhappy Lords 
by A. K. Chesterton                                       
Nuremberg and Other War Crimes Trials: A New Look 
by Richard Harwood               
Occult Theocrasy  
by Lady Queenborough, aka Edith Starr Miller. (10MB)
One Sheaf, One Vine  
by Robert S. Griffin, 2004
Origins of the Second World War  
by A.J.P. Taylor
Origins of Christianity  
by Revilo P. Oliver
Pasque di Sangue  (original Italian)  13.7MB
Passing of the Great Race  
by Madison Grant, 1916
Swedish translation of the Passing of the Great Race        
(Maps in full size are in the GRAPHICS FOLIO)
Path of Wotan (NS Kindred, 1994)
Poisonous Mushroom    
by Ernst Hiemer (with graphics)
Practical Politics 
by Dr. Revilo P. Oliver
Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel  
by Robert Faurisson, IHR, 1999).  
Includes Elie Wiesel: Messenger To All Humanity (L.A. Rollins, IHR, 1985)
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion        
(Swedish translation)  
UPDATED 4/3/2014
Prussianism and Socialism  
by Oswald Spengler)
Queen Isabella 
(includes material from William Thomas Walsh
re. medieval Spanish Jews)
Race and Reality  
by Carlton Putnam, 1967
Race and Reason 
by Carlton Putnam, 1961)
Reds in America  
by R.M. Whitney, 1924  (17.4MB)
Red Symphony  
by Josif Landowsky                               
Reflections on the Christ Myth    
by Revilo P. Oliver 
Reichstag Fire  
by Fritz Tobias, 1964
Religion of Odin 
Asatru Free Church Committee, Viking House, 1978
Revolt Against the Modern World 
Julius Evola, 1969/95. (18MB)
Revolution Betrayed  
by Leon Trotsky                            
Saddam Hussein  
by Nita M. Renfrew  (12.1MB)
Saint Einstein  17.4MB  This poster-boy for the international Jewish establishment (he fulfilled the purpose of “anti-Nazi” and “anti-fascist”) was a poor physicist.  At home, he fiddled for mathematicians and did math for musicians–I wonder why?
Secret Holocaust 
by Eustace Mullins
Secret Societies and Subversive Movements  
by Nesta H. Webster, 1924. (Complete)    
Silent Jew – The Timmerman Controversy
Six Million Reconsidered  Vol. 1  (ed. by William N. Grimstad)                
ANOTHER VERSION       
Special Treatment  
by Carlo Mattogno, 2004 (6.9MB)
Stuka Pilot  
by Hans Ulrich Rudel)  
[another version]
Taguba Report  (ZIP file)
Tales of the Holohoax  
(featuring the superb cartoons of A. Wyatt Mann)                   
This Time the World  
by George Lincoln Rockwell)  
[another version]
Truth About 9-11  
by Rev. Dr. Matt Hale)
‘Twas a Famous Victory  
by Benjamin Colby, 1974
Twilight Over England 
by William Joyce                                 
Ultimate Solution  (Eric Norden, 1973)  
Premise: All Jews have been annihilated from the Earth by the world-victorious Axis. Then evidence turns up that there is still a Jew alive in New York City. NY cops have to hunt him down. Unfortunately, the Nazis are shown here as homosexual (?!), but there’s enough non-PC stuff going on here to keep it interesting.
War is a Racket  (USMC Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler)
West, War and Islam  
by Ernst Zundel
Which Way Western Man? 
by William Gayley Simpson
White Power  
by George Lincoln Rockwell)
Who We Are  
by William Luther Pierce  
(A series of articles on the history of the White race)
Women of the Far Right  
by Glen Jeansonne, 1996
Wrongfully Accused 
by Henrik Holappa
Yellow Peril 
by Dr. Revilo P. Oliver
You Gentiles 
by Maurice Samuel
Zion’s Fifth Column  
by Calif. state senator Jack B. Tenney, 1953
Zionism & Russia  
(8 Pacifica Forum Lectures by Valdas Anelauskas)
Zweites Buch  
(Sequel to Mein Kampf, The Second Book of Adolf Hitler)
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
This site does not condone or encourage illegal activity of any kind.
The materials are presented here so that people may freely investigate social, moral and political issues.

APPENDIX  1  :  LIST  OF  RECOMMENDED  WEBSITES

APPENDIX 2 : MORE  RECOMMENDED  SITES

(Apologies for the duplications)
A Government of Wolves
http://agovernmentofwolves.com
Andrew Carrington Hitchcock
http://www.andrewcarringtonhitchcock.com
AntiCorruption Society
http://anticorruptionsociety.com
Birdman (John Bryant)
http://www.thebirdman.org
Birth of a New Earth
http://birthofanewearth.com
Celtic People’s Party of Ireland
http://www.cppireland.org
Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust
http://codoh.com
Elie Wiesel Cons the World
http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com
End of the American Dream 
http://endoftheamericandream.com
Expel the Parasite
http://expeltheparasite.com
Fitzpatrick Informer
http://fitzinfo.wordpress.com
From the Trenches World Report
http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com
Greatest Story Never Told
http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv
Inside the Eye — Live
http://insidetheeyelive.com
Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org
Justice for Germans
http://justice4germans.com
Lady Michelle Renouf
http://tellingfilms.co.uk
Land Destroyer Report
http://landdestroyer.blogspot.com
Nature Bats Last
http://guymcpherson.com
Patriots Question 9/11
http://www.patriotsquestion911.com
Political Velcraft | Veil of Politics
http://politicalvelcraft.org
Robert Faurisson
Google “robert faurisson blog”/translate
Rutherford Institute
https://www.rutherford.org
Sputnik International
http://sputniknews.com
Storm Clouds Gathering
http://stormcloudsgathering.com
White Rabbit Radio
http://whiterabbitradio.net
Who Controls America?
http://thezog.info

Posted by at No comments:

552 About Putin. De gestoorde aanvallen op Putin, afgelopen maand. Patriclk Armstrong.

I want to repost a few articles ( blogs 550-553)  that I find in the media, just to show how very much energy the USA has spent in demonising and bashing Putin and Russia.

Putin Derangement Syndrome August 2016

In which I collect all the examples of this strange mental defect that have caught my attention in the month of August in the seventeenth year of The New American Century.
 
Patrick Armstrong Subscribe to Patrick Armstrong
(Russia Observer) Subscribe to Russia Observer
20 hours ago | 2,289 55
Vladimir Nosferatuvich Putin
Originally appeared at Russia Observer
PUTIN IS WINNING THE US ELECTION

Speaking of “all available evidence”, the WaPo tells us the lack of “fingerprints” is the evidence; CBS says the presence of “fingerprints” is the evidence. One or the other, I guess: but it’s all “evidence”, isn’t it?
But maybe none of this matters, as the WaPo explains; Putin might use Russia’s tremendous hacking power to disrupt the entire election. He’s already sniffing around: “Russians Hacked Two U.S. Voter Databases, Officials Say” and he’s gnawing away at the “newspaper of record“. Maybe it’s already too late: “Vladimir Putin Has Already Won Our Election: It’s time to face the facts: Kremlin spies and hackers are undermining American politics“.
(A small request – can we have a pronunciation closer to vla-DEE-mir than VLAD-i-mir? Americans ought to be able to pronounce the name of their soon-to-be Commander-in-Chief.)
PUTIN’S MIND CONTROL
Then there’s the Nooscope. Whatever that is. But it’s frightening and sinister. A sort of mental Dracula, I suppose. Fortunately we have Masha Gessen to guide us through the forest “A final fact about Vayno is that the letters of his last name can spell voyna, the Russian word for war. Is this the message that Putin is sending?” Вайно – война, you decide. Maybe Putin’s “gunslinger walk” orAsperger’s affects his ability to spell. (But he could probably find, or create, someone actually named Антон Эдуардович Война if he really tried, don’t you think?) But, as Gessen is a homonym for guessin’, who knows what message is being sent by whom?
The NYT suggests that in Sweden, where actually two thirds don’t want to join NATO, all expressed opposition to joining can only be the work of A Powerful Russian Weapon: The Spread of False Stories. (Amusing to consider the three “false stories” the NYT mentions and think: 1) nukes in İncirlik 2) renditions and other things we only learn about later and 3) SOFA – see Okinawa. The NYT should put more effort into its propaganda: this is an insult to its readers.)
MISCELLANEOUS
Time for another Olympics, time for another invasion says Luke Harding. (Bit stale-dated that, but the Para-Olympics aren’t over so there’s still time for Putin to invade somebody. But Harding can recycle the piece in two years.)
Why is Russia in Syria? Don’t waste your time listening to what the Kremlin says: the current Porcelain Cup holder knows it’s because “Russia wants to erase the humiliation of the Soviet Union’s defeat in Afghanistan in the 1980s.”
Next month, new collection. The PDS epidemic is very contagious.
Posted by at No comments:

551 About Putin. More and more killings by the Kremlin. Paul Robinson.


I want to repost a few articles ( blogs 550-553)  that I find in the media, just to show how very much energy the USA has spent in demonising and bashing Putin and Russia.

Kremlin Killings on the Rise NYT Says, Cites Kremlin Loyalist Deaths as Proof

Who cares about facts when there's confirmation biases (*) to be fed
Paul Robinson Subscribe to Paul Robinson
Originally appeared at Irrussianality
The front page of Sunday’s edition of The New York Times bears the headline ‘More of the Kremlin’s Critics are Ending Up Dead’. According to the long article which follows: ‘Muckraking journalists, rights advocates, opposition politicians, government whistle-blowers and other Russians who threaten that image are treated harshly — imprisoned on trumped-up charges, smeared in the news media and, with increasing frequency, killed.’ The article then cites Gennadi V. Gudkov, ‘a former member of Parliament and onetime lieutenant colonel in the KGB’ as saying, ‘The government is using the special services to liquidate its enemies. … It was not just Litvinenko, but many others we don’t know about, classified as accidents or maybe semi-accidents.’
I have two serious doubts about the Times article. First, it makes a claim about an ‘increased’ frequency of state-sponsored murder without providing any evidence that such murders are indeed more frequent than in the past. The article mentions 13 deaths. The great majority of these occurred before Vladimir Putin returned to the presidency in 2012. This is hardly evidence of an ‘increasing’ frequency of state-sponsored murder

Second and more importantly, the article fails to provide evidence that most of the people it mentions did indeed die unnatural deaths and also died at the hands of Kremlin assassins.
There is certainly an element of truth in the article. It seems clear that the Russian secret services were responsible for the death of at least one of those mentioned – Ibn al Khattab – while a second – Sergei Magnitsky – died in police custody. It is also not unreasonable to claim a link between Russian intelligence and the death of Alexander Litvinenko, while the death of another person mentioned – Alexander Perepelichny – undoubtedly seems suspicious. Had theNew York Times limited itself to those cases, it would have been on much more solid ground. Unfortunately, it goes beyond them and includes several more cases in which people apparently died of natural causes, or in which evidence of a link between the Kremlin and the death in question is not provided.
Take, for instance, Oktai Gasanov, who was connected to the company Heritage Capital, which Russian police accused of fraud – a case which led to Magnitsky’s imprisonment and death. But Gasanov died while the alleged fraud would have been still in its early stages. There was no reason for the Kremlin to be interested in him. Furthermore, The New York Times lists his cause of death as ‘heart failure’. Similarly, the article mentions the deaths in 2016 of two former officials of the Russian sports anti-doping agency, Nikita Kumaev and Viacheslav Sinev. I haven’t been able to find details for Sinev but Kumaev is said to have died of a heart attack. In neither case does The New York Times or any other source I have found provide any evidence that either man’s death was other than natural. There has been speculation that Kumaev was about to ‘reveal all’ about Russia’s doping policies, and perhaps The New York Times thinks that he was murdered to stop this. But if so, it doesn’t say so, let alone provide any proof.
In two other instances, the article mentions people who clearly did suffer unnatural deaths, but without giving any indication of why it thinks these deaths were linked to the Kremlin. The first case is that of Ivan Kivelidi, a business killed by cadmium poisoning in 1995. As The New York Times itself admitted at the time, then Russian Prime Minister Viktor Chernomyrdin ‘expressed outrage over Mr Kivelidi’s death’ at a Cabinet meeting, and attended his funeral. The second case is that of Mikhail Lesin, who died of ‘blunt force trauma’ in a Washington hotel room in 2015. But Mr Lesin was a Kremlin loyalist, not an opponent. The New York Times wants us to believe that Russian intelligence killed both Mr Kivelidi and Mr Lesin, but it provides no evidence, and it seems rather unlikely.
There is a case to be made that the Russian state has been involved in some extrajudicial killings. But the lack of evidence produced by The New York Times in the majority of the cases this article lists makes its overall thesis very unconvincing.

confirmation biases (*)
Als je iemand eenmaal zwart gemaakt hebt ( door iets boosaardigs over hem te vertellen) in de publieke opinie,  dan zullen nieuwe gebeurtenissen al hel snel negatief worden geinterpreteerd.  En nieuwe boosaardige informatie over de gedemoniseerde persoon zal bijna zonder twijfel worden geloofd. 
Wikipedia:
Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias, is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses, while giving disproportionately less consideration to alternative possibilities.
Posted by at No comments:

550 About Putin. America has alienated Putin. Robert Bridge.

I want to repost a few articles ( blogs 550-553)  that I find in the media, just to show how very much energy the USA has spent in demonising and bashing Putin and Russia.


Top 7 ways America Has Alienated Vladimir Putin

By Robert Bridge
September 02, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "RT " - Western media and thinktankdom have gone wildly off the rails regarding the Russian leader, blaming anything and everything on Vladimir Putin. The public has largely bought the raw propaganda wholesale and this is a tragedy for US-Russian relations.
A cursory glance at Putin’s track record should convince even the most jaded Russian observer that he has done everything possible to build solid relations with the United States. Yet not only has the Obama administration refused to meet Putin halfway, it characterizes the Russian leader as the global arch villain bar none.So here’s a refresher course for anybody who’s ever dragged Putin’s name through the mud, serving up piping hot propa-garbage while helping to exasperate tensions between Russia and the US.
As Vladimir Nabokov once proclaimed before considering an entirely different subject, “Look at this tangle of thorns”.

7. Putin provides ‘extraordinary assistance’ to ‘War on Terror’

It is no secret that following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 against the US, Putin was the first global leader to telephone US President George W. Bush. And he didn't call collect. Moreover, the Russian leader offered more than just words of condolence. He pushed through a raft of legislation to assist the US in the fight against terrorism.
In his 2011 book, “Vladimir Putin and Russian Statecraft,” Allen C. Lynch documented Putin’s contributions to America’s endless ‘War on Terror’.
“In a bold decision… Putin made Russia the most important U.S. ally in the war against the Taliban,” Lynch wrote. “Among other things, he accelerated deliveries of weapons to the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan so that when the Alliance marched into Kabul it did so with Russian, not American, weapons and vehicles. He encouraged the governments of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan to allow American military bases on their territory.”
And here is my personal favorite: “He opened Russian airspace for American overflights to bases in Central Asia so that the US could conduct search and rescue operations for U.S. airmen (Please imagine the howl of pain that would echo across Washington if any US president allowed Russian military overflights across US territory into South America!).
Despite Putin’s extreme generosity bestowed upon the US military and intelligence apparatus, Washington proved Graham Greene’s adage “there is no such thing as gratitude in politics” by ratcheting up pressure against Russia for no good reason whatsoever.
According to Stephen Cohen, the US repaid Putin for his “extraordinary assistance” by “further expanding NATO to Russia’s borders and by unilaterally withdrawing from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty, which Moscow regarded as the linchpin of its nuclear security.” 
With friends like this who needs enemies?

6. Putin gives Washington a chance to pass on war (for a change)

After spending prodigious amounts of money, material and manpower fighting fundamentalists in the desert, some might be tempted to think the US would relish any opportunity to avoid another military misadventure. If you believed that, you haven’t been paying attention to what’s been occurring in the Middle East since 2002 with the US invasion of Afghanistan.
Future historians (that is, assuming there is a future where historians may ponder the past) may one day mark August 29, 2013 as the day when the American Empire first started showing signs of wear and tear. That was when UK Prime Minister David Cameron failed to secure approval in the House of Commons to join yet another US-led serial killing, this time in Syria, after President Bashar Assad purportedly crossed Obama’s whimsical “red line” and used chemical weapons against the Syrian opposition (an assertion that was never proven).
This placed the Obama administration in a bind, eventually leading to a ‘slip of the tongue’ by US Secretary of State John Kerry, who remarked that Syria could avoid an American blitzkrieg if it agreed to surrender its chemical weapons “within one week”. Infuriatingly for the US neocons, Putin successfully convinced Damascus to remove its chemical weapons with all due haste.
Predictably, however, US media and thinktankdom portrayed Putin’s eleventh-hour diplomacy, which delayed the obliteration of yet another Middle East state, as some sort of geopolitical ploy.
"It absolutely is a diplomatic win by Putin right now," Fiona Hill, director of the Center on the United States and Europe at the Brookings Institution, told CNN.
I was almost expecting Fiona to employ some sort of judo analogy next. Oh wait, she did.
"If we think about this as judo, which is of course Mr. Putin's favorite sport, this is just one set of moves," she said. "And right now, he's managed to get Obama off the mat, at least, and get the terms set down that play to his advantage."
Think about that. If that was the best press Putin could get when he helped America to avoid yet another military smash-up, chances are negligible that he would ever get positive reviews under normal circumstances. And therein, dear reader, lies the rub: America has come to the psychotic point in its foreign policy when avoiding military conflict is actually viewed as a setback.

5. Putin offers cooperation on US missile defense system in Eastern Europe

In May, the US put the finishing touches on its Aegis Ashore Missile Defense System in Romania, the culmination of a decades-worth of disingenuous negotiations with Moscow.
Washington’s determination to build this system, which Moscow naturally views as a major security threat smoking on its doorstep, has completely upset the strategic balance in the region. Russia is now forced to respond to this system with more powerful and elusive ballistic missiles. In other words, our tiny, fragile planet, thanks to the surrogate mother of global upheaval and chaos, Lady Liberty, is experiencing the birth pains of another arms race between the world’s two nuclear superpowers. This did not have to be.
Early in his presidency, Obama announced he would “scrap” the Bush administration's defense system, slated for Poland and the Czech Republic, after it was determined that Iran was not the existential threat to Eastern Europe that his predecessor had touted it as.
This seemed to indicate an open window of opportunity for Russia-US cooperation (in fact, the fate of the New START nuclear disarmament treaty, signed into force between Dmitry Medvedev and Barack Obama on April 8, 2010, hinged on bilateral cooperation). Russia even proposed the two countries share the Qabala Radar in Azerbaijan, which Russia leased at the time, but the US rejected the proposal even though it made more tactical sense.
Eventually, it became maddeningly apparent that the US was bluffing, dangling the carrot of mutual cooperation with Russia at the same time a new missile defense system was moving forward.
In November, Putin rightly accused the US of attempting to “neutralize Russia’s nuclear potential” by camouflaging their real designs behind Iran and North Korea.
“The US is attempting to achieve strategic military superiority, with all the consequences that entails,” he said.
Obama’s failure to cooperate with Putin on this game-changing system has been the real source of bad blood between the two nuclear superpowers.

4. Putin delivers setback to Islamic State in Syria

In September 2015, following an official request by the Syrian government, Russia launched a formidable aerial attack on Islamic State positions in Syria. Russia went on to provide ample video evidence of its success against ISIS, not only hitting its command and control centers, but destroying its makeshift oil exporting business.
Oddly, Moscow’s request for assistance in providing logistics on terrorist positions was rebuked by Western governments. In fact, the only thing Putin got from the United States for his labors in Syria was a lamentable lecture by US Defense Secretary, Ashton Carter:“This will have consequences for Russia itself, which is rightly fearful of attacks,” Carter said before uttering a regrettable prediction.“In coming days, the Russians will begin to suffer from casualties.”
Coincidentally, throughout the course of Russia’s military offensive in Syria, it has only lost a single fighter jet and a number of servicemen. But not to Islamic State or some other nefarious group. The jet was shot down by Turkey, the first time a NATO member engaged a Russian aircraft in over 50 years.

3. Putin bans genetically engineered food

Despite whatever Monsanto lobbyists may tell our representatives in Congress, Americans are overwhelmingly opposed - on moral, ethical and health grounds - to genetically modified foods.
In a survey of US residents representative of the population on gender, age, and income, 64 percent opposed GMO, and 71 percent of GMO opponents said they were “absolutely” opposed—that is, they agreed that GM should be prohibited no matter the risks and benefits. Yet this clear demonstration of public opinion has not translated into any sort of democratic ability to pull GMO ‘Frankenstein foods’ from the shelves.
What is all the more incredible about America’s willingness to begrudgingly accept genetically modified foods is that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) performs no tests on such products. As Jason Dietz, a policy analyst at FDA, explained: “It’s the manufacturer’s responsibility to insure that the product is safe.”
However, companies like Monsanto are under no obligation to test their products for safety considerations; the process is completely voluntary.
“Well, the companies are supposed to do a voluntary consultation,” Michael Hansen, a critic of GM foods at the Consumers Union, toldGrist. “[B]ut it’s voluntary. Look at what the FDA says when they approve a food: ‘It is our understanding that Monsanto has concluded this is safe.’ They just rubber-stamp it.”
While Americans are being essentially used as laboratory test bunnies, paying good money to consume products that may or may not kill them, Putin refuses to play Russian roulette with his peoples’ health.
In June, Putin approved a bill that bans all genetically engineered foods from entering Russia. The legislation includes stiff fines for producing GMO products in Russia or importing them from abroad, with the exception of genetically altered organisms and materials used for expertise and research.
Meanwhile, Americans will be happy to know that Russia is offering a healthy alternative to what the global food corporations are delivering.
In his state of the nation speech on December 3 in the Kremlin, President Vladimir Putin said, “We can not only feed ourselves, Russia can become an important global supplier of healthy, organic and high-quality food, especially since the global demand for such products is showing a steady growth.”

2. Putin protects children from overt sexual messages

Since many Westerners will never have an opportunity to visit Russia, their perceptions of this relatively distant country are largely shaped for them by journalists, the majority of whom are predisposed to a form of self-imposed censorship that is constantly whispering in their ear that Russia must never appear attractive to their readers, lest they want to lose their jobs.
Thus, whenever news travels from Russia across the ocean to Western audiences, it is inevitably tainted by misconceptions, misinformation and outright lies. A classic example of this is the Western media outcry following Putin’s so-called ‘anti-gay’ legislation, which is in fact ‘pro-children’ legislation.
Putin patiently explained the legislation in an interview with World Media: "[…] All people are absolutely equal regardless of their religion, sex, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. Everybody is equal. We have recently only passed a law prohibiting propaganda, and not of homosexuality only, but of homosexuality and child abuse, child sexual abuse. But this has nothing in common with persecuting individuals for their sexual orientation. And there is a world of difference between these things."
Personally - and I’ve spoken with many people on this issue who feel the same way - this passage sounds like the Mount Everest of common sense. Why on earth should children be exposed to issues – whether they are of a homosexual, heterosexual, metrosexual or what-have-you-sexual content – at such an early age? There is an appropriate time for such considerations later in life and probably better after puberty.
Well, good luck trying to convince the Western media of that.
Harvey Fierstein, just prior to the Sochi Olympics, wrote in the New York Times that "Putin has declared war on homosexuals... allowing police officers to arrest tourists and foreign nationals they suspect of being homosexual, lesbian or “pro-gay” and detain them for up to 14 days."
Fierstein, an actor and playwright, not a lawyer, continued peddling absurdities that "the law could mean that any Olympic athlete, trainer, reporter, family member or fan who is gay — or suspected of being gay, or just accused of being gay — can go to jail."
To be honest, this ranks as some of the smelliest anti-Russia rubbish I have ever read (If I may, I would just like to assure readers, and especially the homosexuals, there are no anti-gay goon squads on patrol in Russia, so feel free to pack your rainbow-colored T-shirt).
Instead of quoting a Russian source (this may come as a surprise, but Russia does have lawyers) that might just have some insight as to what the law really says, Fierstein quoted the Huffington Post, who got their blotched information from an obscure Canadian travel site. So much for investigative journalism.
In any case, Putin’s actions on behalf of protecting children (not arresting homosexuals) offer a nice counterbalance to America’s disturbing desire to expose children to overt sexual messages at very young ages. And not just your traditional fireside chats with Dad about the birds and the bees. No, that would be too damm sensible.
Today, many American schoolchildren, before they are old enough to lace up their shoes, are being psychologically strip searched, with demands being made upon them to come to terms with their sexuality, with forays into the tall weeds of transgender.
Personally, I am grateful for Putin to present an alternative method for addressing such extremely sensitive issues to our children.

1. Putin keeps America in the space race

Although the US continues to enforce a sanctions regime against Russia, which seems, incidentally, to be damaging Western interests far more than Russia’s, Putin continues to let America use Russian rockets to travel to outer space, keeping the US from being a landlocked superpower.
Needless to say, this is a rather embarrassing situation for NASA, which must rely on the Atlas V rocket, powered by a Russian rocket engine, to transport its satellite technology into the cosmos.
Senator John McCain, a perennial anti-Russia bugbear, recently stormed: “Today, Russia holds many of our most precious national security satellites at risk before they ever get off the ground."
Former NASA administrator Mike Griffin put the problem squarely on Washington’s shoulders, complaining that “Americans spend more annually on pizza ($27 billion USD) than on space.”
“Due to such changes NASA’s mission today is much weaker than several decades ago,”wrote Nenad Drca in Modern Diplomacy. “The United States, first to send men to the moon in 1969, now struggles in the 21st century to reach beyond low-earth orbit without expensive Russian assistance. How the mighty have fallen…”
All things considered, the United States – and the world - has far more to gain with better relations, not just with Vladimir Putin, but with Russia. If you don't believe it, put down that Western newspaper and come see the reality for yourself.
Robert Bridge is an American writer and journalist based in Moscow, Russia. His articles have been featured in many publications, including Russia in Global Affairs, The Moscow Times, Lew Rockwell and Global Research. Bridge is the author of the book on corporate power, “Midnight in the American Empire”, which was released in 2013. email: robertvbridge@yahoo.com 
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, August 24, 2016

549. Waarom veroorzaken de Neocons al die oorlogen? Wat is het doel?

Bij toeval vond ik deze blog op het internet, toen ik googlede op 'Neocon wars'.
Ik vind het verhaal van  Ian Shilling (ian56) steekhoudend, en plaats het hieronder.



What is the real purpose of the Neocon wars?

We know its not to fight terrorism. Its recruited more terrorists & increased terrorism - see Syria, ISIS, Paris, Jakarta etc. etc.

This guy had a good stab at it:-
Financial collapse leads to war
http://cluborlov.blogspot.ru/2016/01/financial-collapse-leads-to-war.html

He is correct that perpetual war feeds the MIC and that failure to win wars is irrelevant because the media won't call them out on it. And he is correct that it is better for the MIC to fail to win wars because the media will call for more war / escalate the war and to INCREASE military spending to "try harder" on a counter productive strategy. Increasing the military budget, increases the power of the MIC.

The Neocon Agenda and it's results
http://ian56.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-neocon-agenda-and-its-results.html
( Deze blog van ian56 heb ik in zijn geheel hieronder weergegeven)

But he didn't really get to the heart of the matter - I guess, though he is clued up, he was either hiding what he really thinks and toned the article down appropriately or he hasn't thought through things enough yet.

If you have more money than anyone could spend in 100 lifetimes what else do you want?
Sure, the elites always want more money - that's how they compare themselves against other billionaires. But does that give them "job satisfaction"? I think not.
I guess scamming someone or a group of people and making another $10m will give most of them a temporary buzz. But a temporary buzz is not really "it".
The real measurement (in the eyes of the super wealthy) is how much power and influence you wield. How many people you employ and directly control, how many other billionaires you could destroy, how many politicians you can buy.
Real power is to manipulate and control people, no matter how far away the story you are telling is from the truth.
Tell people black is white or up is down and they believe it - that's real power.
Control entire governments - that's real power.
Control entire economies - that's real power.

Orwell clearly laid out the agenda in his book 1984.
The elites want total control.
How do you get total control?
Make people scared of some unseen enemy, so they want a big government to "protect" them.
Create perpetual war - it doesn't matter whether its real or imagined as long as most people believe it is real.
Make them poor so they are too busy working to think, so there are fewer dissenters.
Punish any dissenters or people that can think and have seen through the lies with Room 101 (currently its more likely to be an IRS audit or to get beaten up by the Police or have a SWAT raid).
Spot and discourage any potential dissenters with Big Brother Mass Surveillance.

The purpose of the Neocon Wars IS 1984
 ------------------------------------

Neocons are not conservatives - in fact they are the exact opposite of "conservatives". Their agenda is global domination through perpetual war. In order to do this they set out to destabilize the entire Middle East from "Algeria to Afghanistan" - excluding Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.

A second agenda is the undermining of National Sovereignty and Laws in favor of increasing the power of elite bankers and crony Corporate control.

The original Neocons (people like Irving Kristol) were hard left revolutionary trotskyites and members of the Democrat Party. They just switched parties. They are also acolytes of Leo Strauss who advocated a totalitarian regime ruled by a small clique of technocrat "experts". Paul Wolfowitz was originally a "leftie" and was mentored by Strauss at Chicago University. (Loads of bad things have come out of Chicago - Al Capone, Leo Strauss, Paul Wolfowitz, Obama to name but a few. It's still extremely bad. Rahm Emanuel is Mayor & Chicago is bankrupt.)

Neocons completely infest the GOP and totally dominate the leadership of the Democratic Party. They are also ensconced in America's closest Western allies - the UK, Canada and Australia.

Unfortunately the Neocon agenda also requires Corporate Fascist control and $1tn a year of war spending, both of which have totally bankrupted the US. It has also completely shredded the US Bill of Rights and set up a turnkey, defacto Police State (the key has yet to be turned on).

These policies have now hollowed out the US economy to the extent that:-

over 90% of the population has seen a decline in living standards since 2000

the wealth creation powers of the US has all but been eliminated

the rest of the world started owning more of the US than the US owns of the rest of the world since 2000

the US runs a trade deficit of $600bn a year

it has a government deficit of $1tn a year

it wastes over $1tn a year on the military

it wastes over $1tn a year on Corporate Welfare to increase the wealth of the top 0.1%

it wastes over $800bn a year on subsidies to the big banks

well over 50% of the population is now dependent on the government (either via some form of welfare payment or via direct employment or via government contracts for things like arms manufacture or outsourced government "services" like private spy contractors and TSA).

The above has hastened the end of $ hegemony and with it US hegemony, helped accelerate the rise of China and the BRICS, put the US on the path to $3tn (and still exponentially increasing) deficits by 2023, a national debt of $40tn by around 2025, the collapse of the global financial system and the US economy.

A selection of Neocons:-
There are a great many more that could be named, e.g. Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, John Boehner, Dianne Feinstein, Lindsey Graham, John Brennan (CIA), Ashton Carter (Def Sec), Strobe Talbott (Brookings - Hillary's choice for Sec of State), Mark Comey (FBI), Keith Alexander (ex-NSA), Tony Blair, David Cameron, Stephen Harper, Tony Abbott, Bernard-Henri Levy, over 50 Washington "Think Tanks" (fellows of CFR, AEI, Brookings, Heritage Foundation, Hudson Institute, Carnegie Endowment for War etc.), NED,  - every member of the Senate Foreign Relations, Intelligence and Armed Forces committees, just about every other senior politician in DC, the Op-Ed writers and senior editors for the New York Times, Washington Post, Economist, Wall Street Journal, etc. and every talking head on Fox News. The list is endless.

N.B. Neocons that are members of the Democratic Party like to be called "Neoliberal Interventionists". This just means they are Neocon Fascists who support abortion and gay rights.

Must read article on the history, strategies and agenda of the Neocons:-
“The machiavelian threefold game of the neoconservatives”


Nazi jurist taught Leo Strauss - Neocon mentor
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2003/eirv30n12-20030328/eirv30n12-20030328_055-nazi_jurist_taught_leo_strauss_n.pdf

The Structural Elite power structure and main Neocon events so far: 
The Quigley Formula - G Edward Griffin on Cecil Rhodes, the Round Tables, the CFR and world governance by elites
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynVqPnMQ2sI&feature=youtu.be

Posted  by 

Posted by at 121 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)