1159 Ivermectine Ivermectine Ivermectine Ivermectine

 Het eenvoudige pilletje Ivermectine licht de volledige sluier op: nu weten we met zekerheid waar we aan toe zijn. 

De halve wereld wordt kreupel gemaakt omdat er een vreselijke besmettelijke ziekte heerst die ons bedreigt. 

Maar alle normale medische regels worden overtreden: 

1) de ziekte wordt niet direct aangepakt, maar men wacht tot hij ernstige vormen heeft aangenomen

2) De goedkope en effectieve middelen die door wetenschappers zijn ontdekt, worden zwart gemaakt, want daar kan Big Pharma niks mee verdienen. 

3) En het meest verbazing wekkende feit dat door de weggetrokken sluier bekend werd:  Onze journalisten zijn totaal stekeblind en a-moreel. Geen halve gram kritisch vermogen in hun lijf. Ze verraden in de volle schijnwerpers van de alternatieve media  hun medeburgers.  Ze mis-informeren het volk. 

4) Minder verbazing wekkend is dat het gelijk van Bertrand Russel wordt bevestigd. Hij zei:  'Je kunt het volk àlles wijsmaken. Echt àlles'.  

Ik begreep nog wel dat je ze wijs kon maklen dat Putin slecht was en Amerika heilig. Ver van hun bed.  Maar blijkbaar kun je ze ook wijsmaken dat ze echt nooit nergens zelf over hoeven na te denken en dat ze in goede handen zijn bij de Elite.  Een elite die al 40 jaar stinkend rijk wordt terwijl de lonen voor de gewone man  al 40 jaar gelijk blijven.  En: zo ongeveer èlke chemische stof die wordt uitgevonden blijkt na 30 jaar gevaar op te leveren en wordt dan uit de handel genomen.  Het vaccin tegen de Mexicaans griep veroorzaakte veel bijwerkingen.  Maar toch je kan het volk ook nu nog met gemak wijsmaken dat ze nu een snel ontwikkeld medicijn met vele bijwerkingen  moeten geven aan hun kinderen ! Zelfs terwijl die niet eens ziek werden van de corona! 

We zien de evolutie voor onze ogen gebeuren:  'Het gewone volk' doorstaat de test van de evolutie niet. Ze zijn niet 'fit' genoeg:  niet ijverig genoeg om tuit te zoieken wat er met hun gebeurt Om te analyseren wie ze wel en wie ze niet moeten geloven.  Het zijn de 'dodo's ' van onze tijd.  Ze worden geelimineerd door een slimmer volkje. Gelukkig hebben ze niks in de gaten, gelukkig gaat het langzaam. 

Laat ik de dik gedrukte regel van hierboven eens ontleden, in drie beweringen.  

De halve wereld wordt kreupel gemaakt omdat er een vreselijke besmettelijke ziekte heerst die ons bedreigt. 

De halve wereld. Ja.  Vooral de ontwikkelde helft, waar braaf naar Big Pharma wordt geluisterd, of naar de Amerikaanse bovenbaas. De Westerse landen. 

Maar ook delen van de rest van de wereld. Soms is er binnen een land verdeeldheid:  Peru versus Lima.  Deelstaten van India. Etc. 

De andere helft heeft schijnbaar nergens last van. Hoe kan dat?  

Omdat ze Ivermectine toe staan. Omdat ze hydroxychloroquine gebruiken, Omdat ze op het vitamine D niveau letten.   Sommige landen hebben geluk omdat ze een jonge bevolking hebben , of omdat ze niet zo veel binnen zitten en veel zon ontvangen. of omdat ze àltijd al laag in vitamine D zitten en het dus altijd - bij wet geregeld-  aan de voeding toevoegen, of omdat ze een traditie hebben van sauna's die het immuunsysteem versterken.  

Sommige landen weten de dodenlijst kort te houden door het virus radicaal te isoleren.  Dat deden China,  Nieuw Zeeland en Australië.  Deze landen hebben soms wèl grote maatschappelijke en economische  schade, maar weinig doden. 

.... wordt kreupel gemaakt ....

Is er opzet in het spel dan? Ja, tenzij we het normaal vinden dat gewone bloggers  vanaf de eerste weken de juiste maatregelen voorstelden en dat de Medische Elite pas 14 maanden later met dezelfde oplossingen komt. ( Terwijl hun vriendjes financieel volledig binnen lopen. Het doet denken aan die arme baas van de FED, Al;an Greenspan, die in 2008 ook moest erkennen dat hij zich met zijn extreem vreemde ideeën ("Huizenprijzen zullen nooit meer dalen") 'helaas vergist had', maar vergat te zeggen dat zijn banken-vriendjes dankzij deze 'vergissing' nu stevig de baas waren geworden over vele Westerse regeringen. )  

Vertrouw nooit een raar advies van iemand die stinkend rijk wordt van dat advies. 

En zo werden de mensen in de rijke landen mooi naar huis gestuurd als ze zich met een virus-ziekte meldden bij hun arts.  Nog nooit vertoond!  Virussen ( eigenlijk àlle ziekten)  moet je zo vroeg mogelijk aanpakken. 

En zo werden mensen in de rijke landen verboden om over HCQ te spreken. Het zou niet helpen.  Het zou gevaarlijk zijn.  Gevaarlijk?  Onderzoek door het WHO zèlf in maart 2017 wees uit dat je er géén hartstilstand van krijgt, alleen een langeren QT  tijd.   Het middel is enige miljarden keren voorgeschreven. 

En zo werd mensen in rijke landen verboden om Ivermectine te gebruiken. Heet zou niet helpen, en misschien wel gevaarlijk zijn.  Maar het heeft de nobelprijs gehaald,  geeft veel minder bijwerkingen dan asperines en werkt even goed tegen de Corona als welk vaccin dan ook.  Maar zònder de mogelijke gevaren die aan de huidige vaccins zitten. 

De rijke landen zijn behoorlijk ontwricht.  Hebben enorme geldschepping moeten plegen ( en misschien was het dààr wel om te doen! ) , verloren de kracht van de middenstand ( was dàt de bvedoeling?)  maar maakten de enkele grote bedrijven veel sterker ( of was het dààr om te doen?). 

... omdat er een vreselijke besmettelijke ziekte heerst die ons bedreigt....

In januari en februari 2020 zag het er heel ernstig uit, maar naarmate de tijd vorderde  werd duidelijk hoe het zat:  Oudere mensen  met een hoge BMI en flink vitamine D tekort  waren de slachtoffers.  De oplossong was simpel:  flink wat vitamine D intraveneus ( in de hormonale vorm) en later volop anti-opntsekings middelen of anti-bloedstollings middelen. 

De ademnood had niks met het virus te maken, maar alles met de gevolgen van het virus:   een op hol geslagen afweersysteem en bloedstolsels, waardoor het bloed gewoon niet door de fijne bloedvaten van de longen kon stromen.  Bloedverdunners waren de echte oplossing, niet de zuurstofmaskers.  

Er was een vreselijke ziekte, maar slechts voor een klein deel van de bevolking.  Die mensen kon je 'wapenen' en beschermen, zodat de rest van de samenleving gewoon door kon draaien. 

Maar dat is niet gedaan. 

Het is volledig fout geelopen, als jhe het vanuit het belang van de mensen bekijkt.  Misschien niet vanuit het perspectief van Klaus Schwab ebn zijn vrienden. 

Wie er schuldig zijn weten we nu nog niet. 

Ik denk niet dat een minister een geldige verdediging heeft als hij zegt: "Ja, maar ik ben minstens drie maal zo stom als die boer in Brabant, of die dansleraar inRotterdam." Ik denk niet dat we dat moeten geloven. 

In Neurenberg werkte die uitvlucht ook niet, en toen waren er maar heel weinig 'gekkies' die met lange lijsten van bewijzen kwamen dat Ivermectine heel goed werkt.  M a w:  die oude nazi's konden nauwelijks beter weten, maar onze OMT leden wèl. 

Ze kozen er voor om zich af te sluiten van de rest van de wereld. Om in hun cocon te blijven.  Om niet open te staan voor logische zaken. 

Ze negeerden hun Eed van Hypocrates. 

Ze stuurden zieken naar huis ipv iets te zoeken om mee te behandelen. 

Hoe kan het zo zijn dat overal in de wereld artsen heel goede resultaten halen met HCQ en Ivermectine , en dat dit maar niet wil doordringen bij de hoge heren? 

Omdat er voor Big Pharma honderden miljarden op hjet spel staan? 

Omdat voor de Bankiers de absolute macht over 'het volk' op het spel staat ? 

                     ------------------------------------------------

Twee heel slimme mensen spreken er 2,5 uur over en dat is geen minuut te lang. 

Die video plaats ik hieronder als eerste: Kory en Weinstein.  

En daaronder plaats ik de nieuwsbrief van Peter Myers van deze week.  

Eerst nog even wat concrete adviezen: 

Hier is de website van het FLCCC van Kory: https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Met rechts het blauwe filmpje: 'What can you do to prevent Covid" ( 4,5 min) 

(  Ivermectine, quercetine, zink, vitamine D, vitamine C, melatonine) 

En midden boven het advies voor mensen die in gevaarlijke omstandigheden werken: het groene blokje.  ( Komt er op neer: elke week 2 pilletjes Ivermectine en 0 % van deze Corona verplegers krijgt zelf de ziekte.   Als geen ivermectine:  58% van hen krijgt zelf de ziekte) . 

                           -------------------------------

COVID, Ivermectin, and the Crime of the Century: DarkHorse Podcast with Pierre Kory & Bret Weinstein     ( Begint pas op minuut  6 ) 

Bret Weinstein

12 minuten geleden

Timestamps: 00:00 Livestream countdown 05:17 Welcome and introductions 06:11 Direct message to YouTube censors 08:15 Layers to the story 09:18 Background to the FLCCC 12:42 Bret's introduction into the treatment 14:07 COVID patients in 2020 and supportive care only 20:14 House calls and deduction in medicine 24:07 Intellectual authoritarianism and medical information censorship 29:20 In the ICU and risk/benefit 33:00 What is ivermectin? History of ivermectin 41:30 Paul Marik 43:59 Juan Columbia with Peru data 46:39 Frustration at response to evidence 52:50 “Steel manning” the scientific response 54:17 Censorship of ivermectin 56:10 Can ivermectin end the pandemic? 59:12 Mexico 01:02:52 Prophylactic use 01:07:28 India 01:10:34 Remdesivir and how they arrive at treatment recommendations 01:12:00 Opponents of ivermectin - emergency use authorisation 01:14:40 Different standards for ivermectin and vaccines 01:16:11 Who's setting the standard? 01:18:24 WHO report on ivermectin 01:20:04 Three categories of herd immunity 01:22:00 Long term impacts of vaccines 01:24:15 Sending sick patients home 01:27:31 Will vaccines work against variants? Ivermectin Vs vaccines 01:32:01 Dosage of ivermectin for prevention, exposure, and treatment 01:37:37 Are you an anti-vaxxer? 01:41:17 Ivermectin in Africa 01:43:20 Nursing homes and scabies 01:47:11 Financial incentives against ivermectin 01:51:02 Cortisol steroids and obsession with RCTs 01:58:32 US response to ivermectin - why the US

ivermectin response is a sign of the corruption 02:03:07 Other countries benefiting from ivermectin 02:03:57 Independent panels of experts support ivermectin 02:05:47 Point of care ultrasound and team's credentials 02:09:13 Congress testimony censored by YouTube 02:10:05 Absolute risk reduction of vaccines with ivermectin? 02:15:19 Unnecessary COVID suffering 02:18:07 Lab leak connection 02:19:31 Long haulers and ivermectin 02:20:55 Post vaccine syndrome and ivermectin 02:22:49 Chronic illnesses and RCTs 02:34:37 FLCCC website https://covid19criticalcare.com/ 02:26:11 Hope, the reckoning, and supporting organisations 02:30:14 Wrap up

Hieronder: de artikelen van Peter Myers, deze week.

Ivermectin saves India, Mexico and Peru; cheap, safe and ignored by MSM

(1) India's Covid explosion occurred because it followed WHO & FDA
advice; once it allowed Ivermectin widely, cases declined
(2) Some states of India use Ivermectin for Covid, but national body
decided not to include it (Oct 23, 2020)
(3) Early treatment could have prevented up to 85% of COVID-19 deaths
(4) "Never never before have we [doctors] become complicit in causing so
much harm" - Dr. Tess Lawrie
(5) India should incorporate Ivermectin into national practice
guidelines (May 11)
(6) Ivermectin saves - from Uttar Pradesh in India to Peru to Brazil
(7) COVID Deaths Plunge after Mexico & Peru introduce Ivermectin
(8) COVID cases and deaths drop in India & Mexico with Ivermectin use
(9) India health ministry advises treatment with Ivermectin and
hydroxychloroquine
(10) Goa offers Ivermectin to the entire adult population; Uttarkhand,
Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh follow

(1) India's Covid explosion occurred because it followed WHO advice;
once it allowed Ivermectin, cases declined

by Peter Myers, June 4, 2020

India's health system is state-based. Whilst some states did allow
Ivermectin use for Covid, most did not, and national bodies did not.
Delhi did not.

At the height of the death toll, they reversed course and allowed
Ivermectin. After that, deaths declined steeply.

(2) Some states of India use Ivermectin for Covid, but national body
decided not to include it (Oct 23, 2020)

India Health Ministry has decided not to include ivermectin for Covid-19
(Oct 23)

https://health.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/pharma/anti-parasitic-drug-ivermectin-not-to-be-included-for-covid-19-treatment-protocol-health-ministry/78819616

Anti-parasitic drug ivermectin not to be included for Covid-19 treatment
protocol: Health Ministry

A government official said, "Many states, for example--Uttar Pradesh,
are utilising the drug as off label for treatment purpose and also for
prophylaxis use against Covid-19.

ANI October 23, 2020, 06:54 IST

Anti-parasitic drug ivermectin not to be included for Covid-19 treatment
protocol: Health MinistryNew Delhi:

The Union Health Ministry has decided not to include ivermectin medicine
(anti-parasitic drug) in the National Clinical Management Protocol for
Covid-19 for the treatment of virus-infected patients.

The move comes after the Central government's National Task Force for
Covid-19 and the health ministry's Joint Monitoring Group (JGM) chaired
a meeting on Thursday to discuss if the anti-parasitic drug should be
included in the national treatment guidelines or not.

A government official said, "Many states, for example--Uttar Pradesh,
are utilising the drug as off label for treatment purpose and also for
prophylaxis use against Covid-19. Now, it has been decided not to
recommend ivermectin medicine in the National Clinical Management
Protocol for Covid-19 as there is not enough safety and efficacy
evidence as per the randomised trials held across the world."

Ivermectin medicine is an inexpensive and safe drug that is used for the
treatment of intestinational parasites and scabies.

In the fight against Covid-19, the Union Health Ministry has approved
the use of several drugs in the treatment of coronavirus with subject to
conditions in the Clinical Management Protocol for Covid-19.

The Central government has already recommended the use of--remdesivir
under "investigational therapies" only for restricted emergency use in
moderate Covid-19 cases. Another drug called--tocilizumab is being used
as off-label for the treatment of Covid patients. Meanwhile,
anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is being utilised in patients
during the initial stage of infection.

(3) Early treatment could have prevented up to 85% of COVID-19 deaths

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/05/18/covid-vaccine-mortality.aspx

Government Scrubs Stats on Vaccine-Related Deaths

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

May 18, 2021

According to Dr. Peter McCullough, vice chief of internal medicine at
Baylor University Medical Center and known for being one of the top five
most-published medical researchers in the United States, COVID-19
vaccines are killing "huge numbers" of people and the government is
simply ignoring it.

In a video interview with investigative journalist and founder of
Liberty Sentinel, Alex Newman, McCullough says the U.S. government, the
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and health agencies around the world
have all committed to vaccinating the global population while sitting on
data showing the COVID-19 "vaccines" are turning out to be the most
lethal vaccines ever created.

Safe Treatments Suppressed in Favor of Dangerous ‘Vaccines’

McCullough, who also has a master’s degree in public health, has
provided testimony in three different Senate hearings, sharing the
treatments he used to help patients recover from COVID-19 and avoid
hospitalization. He summarizes his protocol in the interview.

These strategies are also detailed in "Pathophysiological Basis and
Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection,"
published in the January 2021 issue of the American Journal of
Medicine.1 He was also a consulting editor of "A Guide to Home-Based
COVID Treatment."2

During a recent Texas state Senate Health and Human Services Committee
hearing, McCullough noted that, according to available data, early
treatment could have prevented up to 85% of COVID-19 deaths.3 Early
at-home treatment also minimizes the spread, as the amount of time
you’re infectious can be reduced from two weeks to about four days.

Yet, despite being inexpensive and readily available, early treatments
have all been censored and suppressed, apparently in order to secure
this global mass vaccination campaign. In fact, as McCullough notes,
there’s been no clarified guidance on COVID treatment at all, not even
hospital protocols.

The entire focus of our health agencies has been on masking, lockdowns
and waiting for a gene therapy "vaccine." The results have been
devastating. Five months into the mass vaccination campaign, more than
10,000 in the U.S. and European Union have already died after getting
the shots. Any other vaccine would have been pulled from the market by now.

(4) "Never never before have we [doctors] become complicit in causing so
much harm" - Dr. Tess Lawrie

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/05/21/ivermectin-for-covid-19.aspx

More Good News on Ivermectin

by Dr. Joseph Mercola

May 21, 2021

When it comes to the treatment of COVID-19, many Western nations have
been hobbled by the politicization of medicine. Throughout 2020, media
and many public health experts warned against the use of
hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), despite the fact that many practicing doctors
were praising its ability to save patients. Most have been silenced
through online censorship. Some even lost their jobs for the "sin" of
publicly sharing their successes with the drug.

Another decades-old antiparasitic drug that may be even more useful than
HCQ is ivermectin. Like HCQ, ivermectin is on the World Health
Organization’s list of essential drugs, but its benefits are also being
ignored by public health officials and buried by mainstream media.

Ivermectin is a heartworm medication that has been shown to inhibit
SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro.1 In the U.S., the Frontline COVID-19
Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) has been calling for widespread adoption
of Ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all
phases of COVID-19.2,3

In the video above {at link above}, Dr. John Campbell interviews Dr.
Tess Lawrie about the drug and its use against COVID-19. Lawrie is a
medical doctor and Ph.D. researcher who has done a lot of work in South
Africa.

She’s also the director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd.,4
which is based in the U.K., and she helped organize the British
Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel5 and the
International Ivermectin for COVID Conference, held April 24, 2021.

Ironically, as a consultant to the World Health Organization and many
other public health organizations, her largest clients are the very ones
who are now actively suppressing the use of this drug. ...

What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is the fact that
it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals
are required, as well as the inflammatory stage, when the viral load
drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary.

According to Dr. Surya Kant, a medical doctor in India who has written a
white paper6 on ivermectin, the drug reduces replication of the
SARS-CoV-2 virus by several thousand times.7 Kant’s paper led several
Indian provinces to start using ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and
as treatment for COVID-19 in the summer of 2020.8 ...

During the conference, Lawrie proposed that doctors around the world
join together to form a new people-centered World Health Organization.
"Never before has our role as doctors been so important because never
before have we become complicit in causing so much harm," she said.

(5) India should incorporate Ivermectin into national practice
guidelines (May 11)

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/existing-affordable-drugs-could-rapidly-reduce-covid-19-cases-and-deaths-in-india/

Existing affordable drugs could rapidly reduce Covid-19 cases and deaths
in India

May 11, 2021, 12:15 PM IST

Vikas P. Sukhatme and Vidula V. Sukhatme

The COVID-19 humanitarian calamity unfolding in India is on a scale not
seen in this pandemic. This is an extraordinary situation – and it may
benefit from an extraordinary response.

There exist affordable, readily available and minimally toxic drugs
approved for non-COVID-19 use which show remarkable promise in
preventing or treating the new coronavirus. Deploying these drugs in
India is likely to rapidly reduce the number of COVID-19 patients,
reduce the number requiring hospitalization, supplemental oxygen and
intensive care and improve outcomes in hospitalized patients.

Some of these drugs are being tested in large-scale randomized clinical
trials in the US and abroad but in most cases, definitive efficacy data
is pending. With the current COVID-19 situation in India, we do not have
time to wait for results of these studies. Importantly, currently
available safety and outcomes data on these drugs is strong enough that
it is time to incorporate them into national practice guidelines. Indian
authorities should issue such guidelines on the most promising drugs for
each stage of COVID-19. By so doing, physicians will be encouraged to
use these interventions. The resulting real world data from a few
healthcare settings in select cities should be tracked in real time and
guidelines suitably revised. If such measures were adopted, we could see
effects in 3-4 weeks. This strategy might be unusual but it is not
unheard of: France has the Temporary Recommendation for Use, a
"regulatory instrument which aims to allow, on a temporary basis, the
use of a medicinal product to allow its effectiveness to be evaluated on
the basis of its use."

The choice of drugs is critical. We have worked closely with personnel
at the Food and Drug Administration and have connected with the World
Health Organization and the National Institutes of Health to evaluate
the merits of repurposed drugs. Based on a mechanistic rationale, data
in animal models, human retrospective analyses, clinical trials (some
randomized, others not) and anecdotal human data, we created a
prioritized list of interventions that hold the greatest promise and
that could be deployed at scale. For instance, there is strong data from
a randomized trial and a real-world study that administering fluvoxamine
sharply reduces the need for hospitalization in COVID-19 outpatients.
Moreover, anecdotal unpublished data in over 400 acutely ill COVID-19
patients from several community practitioners suggests that
administering fluvoxamine and ivermectin together may be even more
efficacious.

Intervention as early as possible after symptom onset is key. Ivermectin
is already listed as a "MAY DO" on the ICMR and Indian government
guidelines for treatment of acute mild COVID-19 and we suggest that
fluvoxamine be added in this category. Also, ivermectin in the
prophylactic setting merits serious consideration. For the hospitalized,
there are treatments currently used for other conditions that might
reduce the need for ventilator support and lower the risk of death.
These include inhaled adenosine, cyproheptadine and dipyridamole. For
ideas for which there is rather limited human data, the government
should offer pre-approved pilot protocols and funding for rapid
implementation in select centers rather than issue a recommendation for use.

To be clear, it would be ideal to pursue large clinical trials to test
the efficacy of all promising interventions. A randomized adaptive
design could efficiently sift through the many possibilities. It may be
possible to rapidly set up parallel protocols in India if government
authorities can expedite the regulatory process and offer funding. US
trial investigators can be persuaded to provide protocols and web-based
data collection tools.

We hope that the Indian government will take advantage of repurposed
drug research and use temporary use authorizations or guidelines to
rapidly promote the most promising therapies at a national level while
in parallel aggressively encourage pilot studies and large-scale
clinical trials with shovel-ready protocols and funding. Given the
current situation, India has little to lose in piloting these
approaches: the potential gains could benefit not just the country but
the world.

The views presented here reflect those of the authors and are not
necessarily those of the institutions to which they are affiliated. ==

Vikas P. Sukhatme MD, ScD, is the Robert W. Woodruff Professor of
Medicine, Dean of Emory University School of Medicine, and Chief
Academic Officer of Emory Healthcare. ... Vidula Sukhatme, MS, is an
adjunct instructor at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health
...

(6) Ivermectin saves - from Uttar Pradesh in India to Peru to Brazil

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/05/i-dont-know-of-a-bigger-story-in-the-world-right-now-than-ivermectin-ny-times-best-selling-author.html

"I Don't Know of a Bigger Story in the World" Right Now Than Ivermectin:
NY Times Best-Selling Author

Posted on May 25, 2021 by Nick Corbishley

So why are journalists not covering it?

Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just
published an article titled "The Drug That Cracked Covid". The 15-page
article chronicles the gargantuan struggle being waged by frontline
doctors on all continents to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19
treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets
and social media companies to thwart them.

Because of ivermectin, Capuzzo says, there are "hundreds of thousands,
actually millions, of people around the world, from Uttar Pradesh in
India to Peru to Brazil, who are living and not dying." Yet media
outlets have done all they can to "debunk" the notion that ivermectin
may serve as an effective, easily accessible and affordable treatment
for Covid-19. They have parroted the arguments laid out by health
regulators around the world that there just isn't enough evidence to
justify its use.

For his part, Capuzzo, as a reporter, "saw with [his] own eyes the other
side [of the story]" that has gone unreported, of the many patients in
the US whose lives have been saved by ivermectin and of five of the
doctors that have led the battle to save lives around the world, Paul
Marik, Umberto Meduri, José Iglesias, Pierre Kory and Joe Varon. These
are all highly decorated doctors. Through their leadership of the Front
Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC) Alliance, they have already enhanced
our treatment of Covid-19 by discovering and promoting the use of
Corticoid steroids against the virus. But their calls for ivermectin to
also be used have met with a wall of resistance from healthcare
regulators and a wall of silence from media outlets.

"I really wish the world could see both sides," Capuzzo laments. But
unfortunately most reporters are not interested in telling the other
side of the story. Even if they were, their publishers would probably
refuse to publish it.

That may explain why Capuzzo, a six-time Pulitzer-nominated journalist
best known for his New York Times-bestselling nonfiction books Close to
Shore and Murder Room, ended up publishing his article on ivermectin in
Mountain Home, a monthly local magazine for the of the Pennsylvania
mountains and New York Finger Lakes region, of which Capuzzo's wife is
the editor. It's also the reason why I decided to dedicate today's post
to Capuzzo's article. Put simply, as many people as possible
–particularly journalists — need to read his story.

As Capuzzo himself says, "I don't know of a bigger story in the world."

Total News Blackout

On December 8 2020, FLCCC member Dr Pierre Kory gave nine minutes of
impassioned testimony to the US Homeland Security Committee Meeting on
the potent anti-viral, anti-inflammatory benefits of ivermectin. A total
of 9 million people (myself included) saw the video on YouTube before it
was taken down by YouTube's owner, Google. As Capuzzo exhaustively lays
out, both traditional and social media have gone to extraordinary
lengths to keep people in the dark about ivermectin. So effective has
this been that even in some of the countries that have benefited most
from its use (such as Mexico and Argentina) many people are completely
unaware of its existence. And this is no surprise given how little
information is actually seeping out into the public arena.

A news blackout by the world's leading media came down on Ivermectin
like an iron curtain. Reporters who trumpeted the COVID-19 terror in
India and Brazil didn't report that Ivermectin was crushing the P-1
variant in the Brazilian rain forest and killing COVID-19 and all
variants in India. That Ivermectin was saving tens of thousands of lives
in South America wasn't news, but mocking the continent's peasants for
taking horse paste was. Journalists denied the world knowledge of the
most effective life-saving therapies in the pandemic, Kory said,
especially among the elderly, people of color, and the poor, while
wringing their hands at the tragedy of their disparate rates of death.

Three days after Kory's testimony, an Associated Press "fact-check
reporter" interviewed Kory "for twenty minutes in which I recounted all
of the existing trials evidence (over fifteen randomized and multiple
observational trials) all showing dramatic benefits of Ivermectin," he
said. Then she wrote: "AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. There's no evidence
Ivermectin has been proven a safe or effective treatment against COVID-19."

Like many critics, she didn't explore the Ivermectin data or evidence in
any detail, but merely dismissed its "insufficient evidence," quoting
instead the lack of a recommendation by the NIH or WHO. To describe the
real evidence in any detail would put the AP and public health agencies
in the difficult position of explaining how the lives of thousands of
poor people in developing countries don't count in these matters.

Not just in media but in social media, Ivermectin has inspired a strange
new form of Western and pharmaceutical imperialism. On January 12, 2021,
the Brazilian Ministry of Health tweeted to its 1.2 million followers
not to wait with COVID-19 until it's too late but "go to a Health Unit
and request early treatment," only to have Twitter take down the
official public health pronouncement of the sovereign fifth largest
nation in the world for "spreading misleading and potentially harmful
information." (Early treatment is code for Ivermectin.) On January 31,
the Slovak Ministry of Health announced its decision on Facebook to
allow use of Ivermectin, causing Facebook to take down that post and
removed the entire page it was on, the Ivermectin for MDs Team, with
10,200 members from more than 100 countries.

In Argentina, Professor and doctor Hector Carvallo, whose prophylactic
studies are renowned by other researchers, says all his scientific
documentation for Ivermectin is quickly scrubbed from the Internet. "I
am afraid," he wrote to Marik and his colleagues, "we have affected the
most sensitive organ on humans: the wallet…" As Kory's testimony was
climbing toward nine million views, YouTube, owned by Google, erased his
official Senate testimony, saying it endangered the community. Kory's
biggest voice was silenced.
"The Most Powerful Entity on Earth"

Malcom X once called the media "the most powerful entity on the earth."
They have, he said, "the power to make the innocent guilty and to make
the guilty innocent, and that's power. Because they control the minds of
masses". Today, that power is now infused with the power of the world's
biggest tech and social media companies. Together social and traditional
media have the power to make a medicine that has saved possibly millions
of lives during the current pandemic disappear from the conversation.
When it is covered, it's almost always in a negative light. Some media
organizations, including the NY Times, have even prefaced mention of the
word "ivermectin" — a medicine that has done so much good over its
40-year lifespan that its creators were awarded the Nobel Prize for
Medicine in 2015 — with the word "controversial."

Undeterred, many front-line doctors have tried to persuade their
respective health regulators of the unparalleled efficacy and safety of
ivermectin as a covid treatment. They include Dr. Tess Lawrie, a
prominent independent medical researcher who, as Capuzzo reports,
evaluates the safety and efficacy of drugs for the WHO and the National
Health Service to set international clinical practice guidelines:

"[She] read all twenty-seven of the Ivermectin studies Kory cited. The
resulting evidence is consistent and unequivocal," she announced, and
sent a rapid meta-analysis, an epidemiolocal statistical multi-study
review considered the highest form of medical evidence, to the director
of the NHS, members of parliament, and a video to Prime Minister Boris
Johnson with "the good news… that we now have solid evidence of an
effective treatment for COVID-19…" and Ivermectin should immediately "be
adopted globally and systematically for the prevention and treatment of
COVID-19."

Ignored by British leaders and media, Lawrie convened the day-long
streaming BIRD conference—British Ivermectin Recommendation
Development—with more than sixty researchers and doctors from the U.S.,
Canada, Mexico, England, Ireland, Belgium, Argentina, South Africa,
Botswana, Nigeria, Australia, and Japan. They evaluated the drug using
the full "evidence-to-decision framework" that is "the gold standard
tool for developing clinical practice guidelines" used by the WHO, and
reached the conclusion that Ivermectin should blanket the world.

"Most of all you can trust me because I am also a medical doctor, first
and foremost," Lawrie told the prime minster, "with a moral duty to help
people, to do no harm, and to save lives. Please may we start saving
lives now." She heard nothing back.

Ivermectin's benefits were also corroborated by Dr. Andrew Hill, a
renowned University of Liverpool pharmacologist and independent medical
researcher, and the senior World Health Organization/UNITAID
investigator of potential treatments for COVID-19. Hill's team of
twenty-three researchers in twenty-three countries had reported that,
after nine months of looking for a COVID-19 treatment and finding
nothing but failures like Remdesivir— "we kissed a lot of frogs"—
Ivermectin was the only thing that worked against COVID-19, and its
safety and efficacy were astonishing—"blindingly positive," Hill said,
and "transformative." Ivermectin, the WHO researcher concluded, reduced
COVID-19 mortality by 81 percent.
Why All the Foot Dragging?

Yet most health regulators and governments continue to drag their feet.
More evidence is needed, they say. All the while, doctors in most
countries around the world have no early outpatient medicines to draw
upon in their struggle against the worst pandemic in century. Drawing on
his own experience, Capuzzo describes the absence of treatments for
COVID-19 as a global crisis:

When my daughter Grace, a vice president at a New York advertising
agency, came down with COVID-19 recently, she was quarantined in a
"COVID hotel" in Times Square with homeless people and quarantining
travelers. The locks on her room door were removed. Nurses prowled the
halls to keep her in her room and wake her up every night to check her
vitals—not to treat her, because there is no approved treatment for
COVID-19; only, if her oxygen plummeted, to move her to the hospital,
where there is only a single eective approved treatment for COVID-19,
steroids that may keep the lungs from failing.

There are three possible explanations for health regulators' refusal to
allow the use of a highly promising, well-tolerated off-label medicine
such as ivermectin:

As a generic, ivermectin is cheap and widely available, which means
there would be a lot less money to be made by Big Pharma if it became
the go-to early-stage treatment against covid.

Other pharmaceutical companies are developing their own novel treatments
for Covid-19 which would have to compete directly with ivermectin. They
include ivermectin's original manufacturer, Merck, which has an
antiviral compound, molnupiravir, in Phase 3 clinical trials for
COVID-19. That might explain the company's recent statement claiming
that there is "no scientific basis whatsoever for a potential
therapeutic effect of ivermectin against COVID-19.

If approved as a covid-19 treatment, ivermectin could even threaten the
emergency use authorisation granted to covid-19 vaccines. One of the
basic conditions for the emergency use authorisation granted to the
vaccines currently being used against covid is that there are no
alternative treatments available for the disease. As such, if ivermectin
or some other promising medicine such as fluvoxamine were approved as an
effective early treatment for Covid-19, the vaccines could be stripped
of authorisation.

This may explain why affordable, readily available and minimally toxic
drugs are not repurposed for use against Covid despite the growing
mountains of evidence supporting their efficacy.

Ivermectin has already been approved as a covid-19 treatment in more
than 20 countries. They include Mexico where the mayor of Mexico City,
Claudia Scheinbaum, recently said that the medicine had reduced
hospitalisations by as much as 76%. As of last week, 135,000 of the
city's residents had been treated with the medicine. The government of
India — the world's second most populous country and one of the world's
biggest manufacturers of medicines — has also recommended the use of
ivermectin as an early outpatient treatment against covid-19, in direct
contravention of WHO's own advice.

Dr Vikas P. Sukhatme, the dean of Emory School of Medicine, recently
wrote in a column for the Times of India that deploying drugs such as
ivermectin and fluvoxamine in India is likely to "rapidly reduce the
number of COVID-19 patients, reduce the number requiring
hospitalization, supplemental oxygen and intensive care and improve
outcomes in hospitalized patients."

Four weeks after the government included ivermectin and budesonide among
its early treatment guidelines, the country has recorded its lowest case
count in 40 days.

In many of India's regions the case numbers are plunging in almost
vertical fashion. In the capital Delhi, as in Mexico City,
hospitalisations have plummeted. In the space of 10 days ICU occupancy
fell from 99% to 70%. Deaths are also falling. The test positivity ratio
slumped from 35% to 5% in just one month.

One of the outliers of this trend is the state of Tamil Nadu, where
cases are still rising steeply. This may have something to do with the
fact that the state's newly elected governor, MK Stalin, decided to
exclude ivermectin from the region's treatment protocol in favor of
Remdesivir. The result? Soaring cases. Late last week, Stalin reversed
course once again and readopted ivermectin.

For the moment deaths in India remain extremely high. And there are
concerns that the numbers are being under-reported. Yet they may also
begin to fall in the coming days. In all of the countries that have used
ivermectin widely, fatalities are the last thing to fall, after case
numbers and hospitalizations. Of course, there's no way of definitively
proving that these rapid falloffs are due to the use of ivermectin.
Correlation, even as consistent as this, is not causation. Other factors
such as strict lockdowns and travel restrictions no doubt also play a part.

But a clear pattern across nations and territories has formed that
strongly supports ivermectin's purported efficacy. And that efficacy has
been amply demonstrated in three meta-analyses.

India's decision to adopt ivermectin, including as a prophylaxis in some
states, is already a potential game-changer. As I wrote three weeks ago,
if case numbers, hospitalizations and fatalities fall in India as
precipitously as they have in other countries that have adopted
ivermectin, it could even become a watershed moment. But for that to
happen, the news must reach enough eyes and ears. And for that to
happen, reporters must, as Capuzzo says, begin to do their job and
report both sides of this vital story.

This entry was posted in Guest Post on May 25, 2021 by Nick Corbishley.

(7) COVID Deaths Plunge after Mexico & Peru introduce Ivermectin

Authorities create home-treatment-kit for 22 million-strong population

https://www.wnd.com/2021/05/covid-deaths-plunge-major-world-city-introduced-ivermectin
 
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-deaths-plunge-major-world-city-introduces-ivermectin/5746746

COVID Deaths Plunge After Major World City Introduces Ivermectin
Authorities create home-treatment-kit for 22 million-strong population

WND May 31; Global Research June 1, 2021

A citywide initiative in Mexico City to prescribe ivermectin to COVID-19
patients resulted in a plunge in hospitalizations and deaths, two
studies found.

Hospitalizations were down by as much as 76%, according to research by
the Mexican Digital Agency for Public Innovation, Mexico's Ministry of
Health and the Mexican Social Security Institute, according to a
TrialSiteNews report highlighted by LifeSiteNews.

Earlier this month, as WND reported, a significant decrease in cases in
India coincided with the national health ministry's promotion of
ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine treatments.

In Mexico City, after a spike in cases in December, the city's Ministry
of Health created a home-treatment kit for residents. The city's metro
population is 22 million.

At the time, the head of the Mexico City Ministry of Health, Oliva
López, said told reporters her agency had determined "that there is
enough evidence to use in people positive for SARS-CoV-2, even without
symptoms, some drugs such as ivermectin and azithromycin."

Beginning Dec. 29, people who tested positive for COVID from an antigen
test and who were experiencing at least mild symptoms began receiving
one of the government's ivermectin-based treatment kits, TrialSiteNews
reported.

The Mexican government then began a study to track the impact of the
early treatment of COVID with ivermectin on the city's population.

The study tracked 200,000 people, dividing in two cohorts — those who
received ivermectin and those who did not.

Through a phone-call-based monitoring system and hospital data on
admissions for COVID-19, the researchers found a reduction of between
52% and 76% in hospitalizations for those who took ivermectin compared
to those who did not.

The government's findings were corroborated by Dr. Juan J.
Chamie-Quintero, a senior data analyst at private Colombian university
EAFIT.

He found that excess deaths in the city dropped sharply only a few weeks
after the ivermectin treatments began.

Chamie-Quintero also conducted a study in Peru, where the government
approved ivermectin as a treatment for the virus in May 2020.

In the 24 Peruvian states that adopted early use of ivermectin
treatment, excess deaths plummeted on average by 59% just 30 days after
the peak death rate. And it had dropped 75% after 45 days in those over
60 years old.

'Large, statistically significant reductions in mortality'

Worldwide, more than 50 peer-reviewed studies have shown the
effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19.

A study by the American Journal of Therapeutics that analyzed 18
randomized controlled treatment trials found ivermectin elicited "large,
statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical
recovery, and time to viral clearance" in COVID patients.

The study concluded that "the many examples of ivermectin distribution
campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and
mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of
COVID-19 has been identified."

In February, a peer-reviewed study found that invermectin reduces
coronavirus infections, hospitalizations and deaths by about 75%.

Ivermectin, in more than 30 trials around the world, causes "repeated,
consistent, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes' at all
stages of the disease," according to the study, which was published in
the U.S. journal Frontiers of Pharmacology.

The evidence is so strong, the researchers believe, the anti-parasitic
drug should become a standard therapy everywhere, hastening global recovery.

"The data is overwhelming – we are in a pandemic, and this is an
incredibly effective way to combat it. If we use ivermectin widely, our
societies can open up," said study co-author Professor Paul Marik,
director of emergency and pulmonary care at Eastern Virginia Medical School.

A previous study by Professor Andrew Hill of Liverpool University also
found ivermectin cuts death rates by about 75%.

'Inaction in front of mounting evidence'

Dr. Pierre Kory, the chief medical officer of the Front Line Covid-19
Critical Care Alliance, is known for his congressional testimony about
the effectiveness of ivermectin. In a live Zoom conference May 13, he
showed the promising data from various states in India in the two weeks
after ivermectin was promoted.

See Kory's presentation:
https://www.brighteon.com/557cbfdb-6888-4c6c-a79a-4e87e069110c

In a Senate hearing in December, Kory presented evidence that ivermectin
prevents infection and saves lives.

"Although we, like many, are extremely encouraged by the apparent
successes in developing effective vaccines, we also are dismayed at the
near complete absence of guidance and research on effective early,
at-home, or preventative treatment options apart from vaccines, a
reality we find unconscionable," he said in his statement.

Kory said he and his colleagues are "worried that if our call to action
is not followed through, confidence in our health care leaders and
agencies will be irreparably tarnished."

"Inaction in front of mounting evidence of safety and effectiveness
during a catastrophic pandemic may also compromise widespread
vaccination support," he warned.

"We will look back to the impact that actions versus inaction had on the
U.S. and the globe two months from now," Kory said. "If we do nothing,
the present trend will continue. History will judge."==

https://joannenova.com.au/2021/02/in-peru-ivermectin-cut-covid-deaths-by-75-in-6-weeks-cheap-safe-and-quite-ignored/

In Peru, Ivermectin cut covid deaths by 75% in 6 weeks: cheap, safe and
quite ignored ...

(8) COVID cases and deaths drop in India & Mexico with Ivermectin use

Dr. Pierre Kory video:
https://www.brighteon.com/557cbfdb-6888-4c6c-a79a-4e87e069110c

https://noqreport.com/2021/05/31/dr-pierre-kory-exposed-whos-suppression-of-ivermectin-youtube-keeps-deleting-this-video/

Dr. Pierre Kory Exposed WHO's Suppression of Ivermectin. YouTube Keeps
Deleting This Video.

Thankfully, we have the video preserved for posterity.

by JD Rucker  May 31, 2021

Dr. Pierre Kory Called Out the WHO for Suppressing Ivermectin. YouTube
Keeps Deleting This Video.

One of the most disappointing things I hear from people I like and
respect is that they've received the Covid-19 "vaccine." I've been
scratching my head so often lately my wife bought me dandruff shampoo.
The cognitive dissonance on display is shocking as people I know who do
not trust government, who allegedly read up on the many questionable
characteristics and statistics associated with the "vaccines," still
rushed to get their jabs.

As I researched to determine if this is an insurmountable "strong
delusion" placed over the masses or if it's just a man-made conspiracy,
I came across a video that called out the propaganda being employed to
promote the vaccines. But promoting the vaccines is one thing.
"Debunking" effective early treatments of the disease, including
Ivermectin, goes far beyond simply promoting vaccines. It's about
misleading people into believing the only way they can survive the
pandemic is if they inject experimental drugs into their body.

That video has since been removed from YouTube for violating "Community
Guidelines."

Pierre Kory Video
<https://www.brighteon.com/557cbfdb-6888-4c6c-a79a-4e87e069110c>

The video was going viral, though there's no telling just how viral it
went because by the time I was able to check on it from a news report
(below) by Art Moore at WND, the video had been removed. According to
the Facebook post by Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance, "Dr.
Pierre Kory, Chief Medical Officer of the FLCCC Alliance, discusses the
ways that public health agencies are manipulating scientific data on
{the "I" medicine} for COVID-19 in order to sow uncertainty about it—
and why they are doing it."

Dr. Pierre Kory spoke only the truth in this video that touted
statistics showing the extreme efficacy of Ivermectin when applied on a
wide scale to Covid-19 cases. He discussed how death rates in a highly
populated area of Mexico plummeted once they adopted Ivermectin as an
early treatment, an area that has had under 2% adoption rate of the
"vaccines."

Then, he got into the major point of the video: The cover-up. Why have
otherwise reputable science and healthcare organizations been
suppressing the statistics of drugs like Ivermectin and
Hydroxychloroquine since long before the vaccines were even developed?
They knew very clearly that the drugs worked wonderfully as has been
exposed many times in forced releases of their internal communications,
including at the World Health Organization.

There appears to be a true conspiracy in play, one that has been bent on
mass deployment of these "vaccines" ever since the beginning of the
pandemic. Some have made valid arguments that the plans were in place
before the world had even heard of Covid-19, all tied to The Great Reset
from the World Economic Forum.

"The major action against Ivermectin was perpetrated by the World Health
Organization, but they are not unique in their guilt of really
distorting the science around Ivermectin," he said. ...

The major action against Ivermectin was perpetrated by the World Health
Organization, but they are not unique in their guilt of really
distorting the science around Ivermectin.

Others have speculated that Big Pharma has so much riding on the
constant flow of vaccines around the world, a flow that they believe
will continue for years to come in the form of "boosters" and new
vaccines for different variants, that they're operating a disinformation
campaign to prevent actual treatments from coming to light. This, too,
may be at least partially correct, but the fact that so many in
government, media, Big Tech, and academia are all involved seems to be
far beyond the depths of even Big Pharma's deep pockets.

At the center of all this is the World Health Organization. As Dr. Kory
said, "I do want to talk about what they're doing today which is they
are actually working contrary to the public interest and that needs to
be called out and that's why I'm lecturing on this issue again today."

Watch the video. It's over an hour but well worth understanding this
cover-up:

The aforementioned article at WND, reprinted below with permission,
shows just how effective Ivermectin has proven to be. Why is this
information being suppressed by everyone, including YouTube?

Ivermectin saves lives. This has been shown to be true by people like
Dr. Pierre Kory and others at Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care. Why are
so many bent on suppressing this data in favor of vaccines? [...]

Dr. Harvey Risch, a professor of epidemiology at the Yale School of
Public Health and Yale School of Medicine, is one of many health experts
who decry the politicization of COVID-19 treatments such as ivermectin
and hydroxychloroquine.

"You can hardly believe what anybody says anymore," Risch said in an
interview in December with Fox News' Laura Ingraham. "We've lost 300,000
lives in the United States because our government has basic told
everyone to go home, stay home, and if you can't breathe, go to the
hospital."

That's not a form of treatment, he said, "it's what we call therapeutic
nihilism."

He said the federal government, through the FDA, CDC and National
Institutes of Health, have misrepresented the benefits of the drugs.

"These are drugs that everywhere else in the world they are being used
very effectively," he said.

Risch contends the COVID-19 mortality rate is five times lower in the
Third World "because that's all they can afford to do."

"And we're here twiddling our thumbs and telling everyone to stay home.
It's absurd," he said.

'The Purge' by Big Tech targets conservatives, including us
Just when we thought the Covid-19 lockdowns were ending and our ability
to stay afloat was improving, censorship reared its ugly head.

(9) India health ministry advises treatment with Ivermectin and
hydroxychloroquine

blob: https://www.brighteon.com/557cbfdb-6888-4c6c-a79a-4e87e069110c

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/05/16/India-turns-to-ivermectin-and-hydroxychloroquine-covid-cases-drop-significantly/

India: COVID-19 cases plummet as the country turns to Ivermectin and
hydroxychloroquine

May 16, 2021 (updated May 17, 2021)

NEW DELHI — India has received the baton for title of COVID Capitol of
the World after China, Italy and the United States held it for much of
last year.

The world second-most populace country after China had fewer than
138,000 total active COVID cases in early February 2021. That's the
lowest figure since January 2020. India active COVID cases sit around
3.6 million today, according to the India Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare. Mainstream media are blaming the massive spike on a "scary,
mutant variant" called B.1.617.

Said media are also speculating whether or not the "vaccines" will work
against the variant. Only about 2.8% of India is vaccinated. Have no
fear. Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are here.

The India health ministry updated its guidelines on April 28 for
quarantines, treating the asymptomatic and those with mild symptoms of
COVID-19. The agency now says that asymptomatic patients should
"consider Tab Ivermectin (200 mcg/kg once a day, to be taken empty
stomach) for 3 to 5 days." Caregivers of patients in quarantine are
instructed to "take Hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis as per protocol and
as prescribed by the treating medical officer." See the full document here.

World Health Organization, big pharma freak out

There are 292 studies (219 are peer-reviewed) proving the effectiveness
of hydroxychloroquine as both a treatment and prophylaxis against
COVID-19. Ivermectin has 93 studies (54 peer-reviewed) showing its
effectiveness as treatment and prophylaxis against COVID-19. Despite the
now-indisputable fact that these drugs essentially kill COVID-19 within
hours or days, the Bill Gates-funded World Health Organization (WHO) and
big pharma are having fits over India's new guidelines and the results.

WHO Chief Scientist Soumya Swaminathan tweeted on May 10 that her
organization recommends against the use of Ivermectin for COVID-19. She
deleted the tweet shortly thereafter. Swaminathan, who happens to be
Indian, cited a February press release from Merck, the company that
discovered and once owned the long-expired patents on Stromectol (aka
Ivermectin). The company wrote that there is "no meaningful evidence"
and "no scientific basis" for using Ivermectin to treat and prevent
COVID-19. Merck is one of the top donors to the CDC Foundation, as is
the now-merged Pfizer/GlaxoSmithKline corporation.

The Canadian Global Television Network called Ivermectin and
hydrochloroquine "two drugs that conspiracy theorists say cure COVID-19
and that scientists say are useless at treating the disease." The Middle
East North Africa Financial Network said there is "little evidence" of
Ivermectin's effectiveness. Times of India called both drugs "dangerous."

COVID cases plummeting in India last two weeks

Dr. Pierre Kory is the chief medical officer of the Front Line Covid-19
Critical Care Alliance. Mainstream media label the good doctor as
"misinformation." He is best known for his Congressional testimony about
Ivermectin. Dr. Kory did a live Zoom conference this week showing just
how effective Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have been since India
implemented the changes in its policies.

{visit the link to see the graphs}

Here are the data from the state of Maharashtra in the two weeks since
Ivermectin.

Here are the data from Delhi.

The same thing happened in Mexico when it started using Ivermectin.

Check out the full video {at the above link}

(10) Goa offers Ivermectin to the entire adult population; Uttarkhand,
Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh follow

https://joannenova.com.au/2021/05/cases-down-in-the-parts-of-India-that-approved-ivermectin-use/

Covid cases falling in the parts of India that approved Ivermectin use
Things are turning around in India — starting within days of increasing
the use of Ivermectin again.

But where is the media? Who is reporting that the turnaround in some
states of India has started within a couple of weeks of the expanded use
of Ivermectin — the 50 cent old drug that has been used for 3.7 billion
prescriptions worldwide, given to children to treat headlice, scabies
and worms and is used by the ton on cattle and sheep farms.

Hallalujah? Or read and weep — how much of the ghastly debacle could
have been stopped before it even started?

Ivermectin starts again in India
Ivermectin starts again in India (shaded dark grey)  @jjchamie

On April 20th, New Dehli, AIIMs reccommended Ivermectin be added to the
take home care package. So people getting tested would be able to start
early treatment.

Cases started slowing down almost immediately.

Cases of Covid in New Dehli. India.
….

On May 10th the Health Minister for Goa recommended the use of
Ivermectin in Goa. Indeed, he offered it to the entire adult population.

The next day, the WHO, ever so helpfully, warned against the use of
Ivermectin in India.

Goa, India. Cases of Covid, after Ivermectin introduction.

By Justus R. Hope, MD, Desert Review

Just three weeks after adding Ivermectin, Delhi now leads India out of
the deadly second surge of the COVID pandemic. Cases that had peaked at
28,395 on April 20 plummeted nearly 80% to just 6,430 on May 15. Deaths
peaked May 4, and now they are also down 25%.

Meanwhile, three other Indian states have followed Goa's lead in adding
Ivermectin: Uttarkhand, Karnataka, and Uttar Pradesh. And, as expected,
they have seen a drop in new daily cases as well, with Uttar Pradesh
down nearly 75% from a peak of 37,944 just four days after they began
following the April 20 AIIMS guidance to just 10,505 on May 16.

Sadly Tamil Nadu is going the other way, they used Ivermectin for three
days, then stopped it, and bought up Remdesivir instead (a Gilead drug
that costs around $3000 a patient.) Still, it's handy to have a control
group.

Shame the people of Tamil Nadu are part of the experiment. Hard to
believe the Chief Minister in Goa is M K Stalin.

Cases of Covid in Tamil Nadu, Graphed.
…

Justus R. Hope:

Twenty thousand doses of Remdesivir cost 60 million dollars, while
20,000 doses of Ivermectin go for a few hundred. Where is a developing
country getting the 60 million dollars a day to purchase the Remdesivir?
Why is their leader throwing away a cheap drug, Ivermectin, that has
saved lives in other countries?

India started using Ivermectin back on August 8, 2020 at the peak of the
first wave. It's not easy to find out when or if the use of Ivermectin
slowed or stopped. Indeed it is strangely difficult to find anything on
most search engines apart from fact checks that warn against the use of
Ivermectin.

There are claims that the use of the drug stalled in January, but very
little official confirmation.

Waves of Covid in India

 From Twitter

Could the media get the situation more wrong?
Back on April 28th at the peak of new cases in India the geniuses on
Business Insider said it was the perfect storm for India and blamed,
among other things, the slow roll out of the vaccine.  Nameless experts
even blamed Ivermectin.

Experts said some doctors in India have – whether due to a lack of
training or sheer desperation – tried administering medications that
don't work against the virus, like ivermectin, a prescription used to
treat parasitic infections.

"I've heard stories of people getting three, four, five, six meds
prescribed to them, medications that have not been shown to be effective
at all," Kuppalli said. "I think people are just grasping for straws and
that just adds to the chaos and the anxiety."

The message from one doctor in India:

Doctors report from India

 From Twitter

In Peru, Ivermectin cut covid deaths by 75% in 6 weeks: cheap, safe and
quite ignored
Ivermectin is a drug so useful early researchers got a Nobel Prize in
Medicine for work on it. It's so well known that in the last thirty
years more than 3.7 billion doses of Ivermectin have been given out.
It's so safe we can use it on cats and dogs and even toddlers. It's dirt
cheap and its use in Ag-science is measured in tonnes. The cost of
Ivermectin is around 15c in the third world, and $50 for one round for a
human in New York.  (It's a lot cheaper than a $5000 a day ICU bed.)

REFERENCE

Paul E Alexander, Robin Armstrong, George Fareed, Kulvinder, K. Gill,
John Lotus, Ramin Oskoui, Chad Prodromos, Harvey A. Risch, Howard C
Tenenbaum, Craig M. Wax, Peter A. McCullough (2021) Early Multidrug
Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (COVID-19) and Reduced
Mortality Among Nursing Home Residents, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.28.21250706

1