Saturday, January 12, 2019

800 Nederland is de rechterhand van de enig echte Nieuwe Hitler.

In 1999  schreven de Neocons hun plan voor een 100 jarig Rijk door middel van oorlog en geweld : het PNAC Report.
Ze begrepen wel dat het niet zo gemakkelijk zou zijn om de burgers tot al die oorlogen over te halen, tenzij... tenzij Amerika op dramatiusche wijze zou worden aangevallen. Net als in Pearl Harbor gebeurde. Ook toen wilde het volk niet mee doen met  WO2, maar na de doden bij Pearl Harbor was het volk woedend en wilde het oorlog.
En verdomd: op 11 sept 2001 kregen ze hun Pearl Harbor.

En direct daarna wàren ze de baas in Amerika.  ( Wesley Clark:  "Right after 9/11  these people committed a  Coup, a policy Coup." )

Sindsdien zijn al heel wat buurlanden van Israel vernietigd.
Niet op legale wijze natuurlijk.
Maar als je zegt dat het voor  'de humaniteit' is  en voor 'democratie'  en  als je zegt dat jij beter bent dan de anderen  ( Exceptional,  indispensable, City on the Hill)  dan hoef je je niet aan de wet te houden.
Het mooiste is natuurlijk als je andere landen mee krijgt die - al is het maar symbolisch-  mee gaan vechten.
Dan heb je een coalitie, en lijkt het net alsof je echt aan de goede kant van de Geschiedenis staat.
En Nederland was altijd het eerste land dat  mee wilde vechten.....


Uit onderstaande wikileak blijkt dat Nederland het braafste schaap uit de kudde is: altijd wilden we als eersten mee helpen bij de vernietiging van weer een landje dat Israel's Lebensraum tekort deed.

Punt 22 ( helemaal onderaan) vat het goed samen: 

Als ' beïnvloeders ' van andere EU  landen moeten de Nederlanders worden aangemoedigd om  een steeds prominentere rol spelen op het wereldtoneel.
Het zal moeite kosten om de Nederlanders in de kijker te zetten, maar
loont koninklijk. De Nederlanders hebben een goede reputatie, een hoge geloofwaardigheid en hun goede capaciteiten maken hen tot effectieve leiders over een breed bereik van geografische regio's en veel inhoudelijke kwesties.

Kortom: met Nederland hebben wij, de VS, goud in handen. Ze kunnen veel voor ons doen.

Het originele Wikileak document staat onderaan, maar is lastig te lezen. 

Daarom een beter de lezen versie als eerste: 


1. (S) SUMMARY:  With the EU divided and its direction
uncertain, the Dutch serve as a vital transatlantic anchor in
Europe.  As one of the original six EU members, the Dutch
ally with the British to counter Franco-German efforts to
steer Europe off a transatlantic course.  The Netherlands'
solid European and international credentials create a
powerful "multiplier" effect.  In Iraq, Dutch forces provided
the physical and political cover for Japan to deploy and the
Dutch are using their NATO Training Mission commitment to
push others to do more.  In Afghanistan, the Dutch drove much
of the Phase III planning for ISAF and deployed Dutch troops
in combat operations for the first time in more than 30
years.  The Dutch have led Europe in launching pilot projects
to strengthen international counterterrorism cooperation, and
initiated the U.S.-EU dialogue on terrorist financing which
laid the groundwork for a proposed major international
Terrorism Financing Conference in 2006.

2. (S) (SUMMARY CONTINUED) The Dutch are expanding their
leadership beyond Europe.  Dutch strategic interests in the
Caribbean make them logical partners to counter Venezuelan
meddling in the region.  They are expanding their military
involvement in Africa, in part to provide a secure
environment for their robust development assistance program,
and in part to add "eyes and ears" on the ground.  In the
Middle East, the Dutch enjoy good relations with Israel and
the Palestinians and would welcome a more active role; they
quickly promised funds for an expanded Multinational Observer
Force (MFO) and might, under the right circumstances, commit
troops.  Even in areas where we disagree, such as drugs and
trafficking in persons, Dutch views may be shifting.  As the
headquarters for major international legal institutions, the
Netherlands offers a unique opportunity for advancing foreign
policy goals far beyond Dutch borders.

3. (S)  (SUMMARY CONTINUED)  The coalition government, headed
by PM Balkenende, is naturally inclined to work closely with
the U.S.  The balance could shift toward Brussels, however,
if a center-left government comes to power in 2007 (or
earlier), as predicted by most polls.  The nearly one million
Muslim immigrants are largely non-integrated, which is
forcing the Dutch to question long-standing assumptions about
Dutch "tolerance" and "identity."  The murder of Theo van
Gogh focused attention on Islamic extremism, and the Dutch
feel they are ahead of much of Europe in addressing this
growing problem.  Strengthening U.S.-Dutch ties across the
political spectrum is necessary to ensure that the Dutch
continue to enlist others to pursue interests in line with
the U.S., especially in the political-military sphere.  Early
and active consultations are the key to harnessing Dutch
energies in enhanced pursuit of U.S. interests.  END SUMMARY.


LEADERS IN EUROPE
-----------------

4. (S)  Along with the British, the Dutch form a strong,
reliable transatlantic anchor in Europe.  As a founding
member of NATO, one of the original six members of the EU,
and Britain's strongest ally on continent, the Dutch are an
influential voice in Europe despite having a population of
just under 16 million.  Prime Minister Balkenende states
often that the Dutch "take their responsibilities seriously"
and therefore expect to be heard.  While the Dutch "no" to
the EU's constitutional treaty embarrassed Balkenende, the
vote revealed that the search for EU integration and
consensus has its limits, capping a trend that started in the
90's with then Liberal Party leader (and later EU
Commissioner) Fritz Bolkestein's proposals to redefine the
scope of European integration to protect Dutch national
interests.

5. (S) With the French-German engine of European integration
stalled, German elections pending, and the EU unable to agree
on finances, leadership opportunities for the Dutch are
growing.  This trend is enhanced by the gravitation of EU
decision making to smaller groups, as Dutch participation can
make or break internal groupings.  The Dutch and Italian
refusal to attend a "group of six" meeting recently proposed
by Schroeder, for example, effectively squelched his
initiative.  The British Ambassador here recently confided
that Blair sees the Dutch as essential to pursuing his
European objectives and ensuring that transatlantic relations
remain high on the European agenda.  The leaders of the
Netherlands, UK, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden already meet
quietly several times a year to coordinate positions prior to
EU Council and other high-level EU meetings.

6. (S) Dutch leadership within the EU does not weaken their
commitment to NATO, where they are "go-to guys" for resolving
potential EU-NATO conflicts.  Their active, if often behind
the scenes, support for NATO SYG (and former Dutch Foreign
Minister) Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, as well as their commitment
to the NRF (and SRF, ISAF, and NTM-I), have helped push back
efforts, such as Tervuren, which might otherwise create
tensions between the NRF and EU battlegroups or other
emerging ESDP capabilities.  Foreign Minister Bot recently
proposed restructuring NATO's decision-making and funding
mechanisms to make them more effective.  The appointment of
Herman Schaper, the former deputy director general of
political affairs at the Dutch MFA and a good friend of the
U.S., as the new Dutch permrep to NATO should create more
opportunities for productive cooperation.

POLITICAL-MILITARY COOPERATION BEYOND THE EU
--------------------------------------------

7. (S) The Dutch are increasingly aware that strategic
interests outside Europe warrant their attention and
leadership, especially in the political-military sphere.  For
example:

- Venezuela:  The Dutch have strategic interests in the
Caribbean (i.e., the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba) and are
deeply concerned about Chavez' meddling in the region.  As a
Caribbean power, the Dutch have good reasons to lead an
effort to balance traditional Spanish dominance on Latin
American issues in the EU, but the U.S. and others will need
to push them to take this role.  The Dutch are active
partners in regional drug enforcement efforts, and recently
demonstrated their ability to deploy military forces (F-16's)
on short notice.  Persuading the Dutch to counter Chavez's
destabilization efforts more actively would give us a
reliable European partner in the region.

- Afghanistan:  According to CENTCOM, the Dutch took a strong
lead in organizing and soliciting forces to staff ISAF Phase
III, and are now preparing to deploy up to 1,400 personnel in
conjunction with British, Canadian, and possibly Australian
forces.  Separately, the Dutch deployment of Special Forces
in a combat role represents a major shift in Dutch priorities
away from peace-keeping to combat missions for the first time
since the 1960's.  The Dutch remain a strong supporter in the
war on terrorism in Afghanistan.  We should encourage them
both to continue to make significant contributions, and to
push others to do more.

- Africa:  Senior Dutch military officials say they are
considering expanding their military presence in Africa to
include Burundi, Rwanda, Eastern Congo, Botswana, Zambia, and
Ivory Coast, adding new "eyes and ears" on the ground.  The
Dutch have requested embedding a cell at EUCOM (similar to
that already operating in CENTCOM) to coordinate their
actions with the U.S. and other allies.  One objective of the
Dutch military deployments is to provide a secure environment
for what is already one of the most ambitious assistance ( Ontwikkelingshulp) 
programs in the world.  The Dutch are the fourth largest
provider of assistance to Africa world-wide.  In 2005 they
established a 110 million Euro Stability Fund for security
sector reform in the African Great Lakes Region and Sudan (as
well as Afghanistan and Iraq.)  Dutch deployments in Africa
have solid support in Parliament, while the focus on security
as an aspect of development provides an attractive
justification for potential European partners.  We should not
only encourage the Dutch to increase their direct involvement
in Africa, but also explore whether the Dutch could act as a
"clearinghouse" for other interested parties.
- Iraq:  The Dutch were instrumental in providing early
logistic support to U.S. forces in Iraq (including permitting
transshipments through Rotterdam when other ports in Europe
would not.)  The Dutch deployed 1,200 troops directly to the
southern province of al-Muthanna for 20 months, including two
controversial extensions.  Although the Dutch have since
withdrawn from al-Muthanna, their presence provided the
political and military cover necessary for Japan to commit
forces.  The Dutch provided 25 trainers for the NATO Training
Mission in Iraq, and have offered to provide up to 100 if
other countries would make comparable contributions.  We
should urge the Dutch to continue to push their EU and NATO
partners to do more in Iraq.

- Middle East:  The Dutch enjoy a reputation for "balance"
almost unique in Europe, as they are strong supporters of
Israel, yet trusted by Arabs.  Given Foreign Minister Bot's
expressed willingness to take a more active regional role.
We should look for opportunities to harness Dutch interest
through participation in the Forum for the Future and other
initiatives.  The Dutch have already promised to make a
financial contribution to an expanded Multinational Observer
Force (MFO) if asked, and, under the right circumstances,
might be prepared to send peace-keepers to the region as well.

8. (S) These commitments demonstrate how the Dutch "take
their responsibilities seriously" in practice by committing
real resources -- money, troops, hardware, and political
capital -- to tackle real problems, as well as their
"multiplier" effect in the political-military realm. The fact
that the Dutch are providing the head (Peter Feith) and
observers to the EU's new monitoring mission in Aceh is the
latest example of their assuming leadership of an important
international mission in a region where they feel special
ties (as witnessed by FM Bot's historic decision this year to
attend the commemoration of Indonesian independence, the
first such visit by a senior Dutch official since Indonesian
independence).

9. (S) The Dutch have one of the largest, most geographically
diverse deployments of military forces in the world, with
more troops deployed as a percentage of their total forces
than any other ally.  Defense Minister Kamp and CHOD Berlijn
recently restructured the Dutch military to eliminate layers
of bureaucracy, including independent service chiefs, thereby
creating a leaner, more deployable force.  Kamp and Berlijn
believe firmly in the "use or lose" principle, and have
accordingly sought increasingly challenging operations --
such as the Special Forces deployment to Afghanistan and
potential operations in sub-Saharan Africa.  Their desire to
maximize the military's capabilities and their preference for
U.S. equipment, even when alternative European suppliers
exist, make the Dutch strong supporters of the Joint Strike
Fighter (JSF) program.  The Dutch are one of only two
countries (Italy is the other) whose financial contributions
merit Tier II status in JSF development.  Berlijn is pushing
to lock in an early commitment for 50 planes (out of a total
of 85) to prevent JSF from becoming an issue in the 2007
elections.  The Dutch are also seeking Tactical Tomahawks for
Dutch frigates, additional lift capacity (CH-47, C-130,
KDC-10), and are continuing to update their remaining
hardware (AH-64D, F-16's, Patriot Missile System, etc.) all
of which are focused on meeting their Prague Capability
Commitment objectives as well as their ability to sustain
extended expeditionary operations outside the European
theater.

COUNTERTERRORISM COOPERATION
----------------------------

10. (S) Faced with growing threats in their own country, as
witnessed by the murder of Theo van Gogh in November 2004,
the Dutch believe they are in the forefront of Europe with
regard to counterterrorism, arguing that legislation and
other steps earlier adopted by the Dutch are only now being
considered in countries like the UK and Italy.  Led by
Justice Minister Donner and Finance Minister Zalm, the Dutch
were the first in Europe to implement the Container Security
Initiative (CSI), Radiological Gates, DOE's Megaports
program, U.S. Customs' Green Lane Program, and, soon, Trusted
Flyers.  China has engaged the Dutch on next generation
protocols and standards for transport security, includng RFID
technology.  It will be important to monitor and work with
the Dutch as they work with China.  The Dutch have also
expressed an interest to participate in DHS's "Centers of
Excellence."  While the EU was arguing with us and itself
over releasing personal records to airlines, the Dutch
allowed U.S. immigration teams (IAP) to operate at Schipol
airport.  The Dutch were instrumental in pushing the EU in
2003 to designate Hamas in its entirety as a terrorist
entity; an EU-wide designation of the Dutch branch of the
Al-Aqsa followed.  During their EU Presidency the Dutch
hosted an EU-wide seminar to raise awareness of terrorist
financing issues and have offered to host a major
international conference on the same subject in 2006. The
Dutch continue to push for EU designation of Hizballah in its
entirety and to strengthen the EU's "Clearinghouse"
designation process.  Given their record, we should continue
to look to the Dutch to launch joint pilot programs in
Europe, and, more generally, to push counterterrorism issues
to the top of the European agenda more generally.

DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE
----------------------

11. (S)  The Netherlands is among the world's leading aid
donors, having budgeted USD 4.2 billion (0.74 percent of GDP,
with a target of raising it to 0.8 percent) in assistance in
2004.  It is a top donor of unearmarked assistance to UN
humanitarian programs.  In 2003, the Netherlands introduced a
more focused aid strategy, which phased out smaller aid
programs in wealthier countries.  Dutch bilateral aid is now
directed to 36 partner countries, including 18 in Africa.  In
2003, President Bush and Prime Minister Balkenende signed an
MOU to coordinate HIV/AIDS programs in Ghana, Zambia, Rwanda
and Ethiopia that emphasizes public-private partnerships.
Balkenende recently expressed interest in using the
Millennium Challenge Corporation as a model for promoting
public-private partnerships world-wide.  USAID's involvement
with a Heineken AIDS treatment and education program in
Rwanda has been particularly successful, and the World Bank
has adopted it as a model.  Dutch creativity and credibility
in development makes them good potential partners for future
joint initiatives with the U.S.  We should also take
advantage of their experience and insights to help shift
global aid efforts in the direction of sustainable long-term
development.

CENTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
--------------------------------------------

12. (S) With the International Court of Justice (ICJ),
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
(ICTY), the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), the
Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, the International Criminal Court
(ICC) and other international legal institutions all located
in The Hague, our ability to have an impact in the
Netherlands on international issues ranging from Iraq to the
Balkans is unique.  With a historical interest in
international law dating back to Grotius, the Dutch view
themselves as natural defenders of international legal norms
and practices.  This tradition made them the perfect hosts
for a conference of Iraqi judges in The Hague in 2004, and
has pushed them to the forefront of international efforts to
train a new generation of Iraqi jurists.  While their
legalistic approach can be frustrating, they are flexible.
Their concerns about U.S. interpretations of the Geneva
Protocols have not prevented their Special Forces from
deploying in Afghanistan.   the Cuban-sponsored resolution on Guantanamo
at the Human Rights Commission last year despite concerns
about the treatment of detainees.  But, as Foreign Minister
Bot told Deputy Secretary Zoellick recently, over the long
run Dutch human rights concerns must be addressed to ensure
that public and parliamentary support does not erode; we and
the Dutch need to work together to resolve this concern.
Finally, the Dutch combination of seeking pragmatic solutions
while remaining true to their legal principles could make the
Dutch an important asset in resolving our differences with
the EU over the ICC and article 98 agreements under the right
circumstances.

ECONOMICS AND TRADE
-------------------

13. (S) Balkenende shares our interest in promoting an open
international trading system and has been an ally in U.S.-EU
trade disputes such as Boeing-Airbus and the Foreign Sales
Corporation Tax.  The Dutch share with the British a vision
of a market-friendly Europe driven by free trade.  They are
the third largest investor in the U.S. and the fourth largest
recipient of U.S. investment world-wide.  Their efforts to
shift the Lisbon agenda in a more cooperative direction and
to promote innovation and competition are creating additional
opportunities for U.S. investors in Europe.  Because the
Netherlands has one of the highest broadband penetrations in
Europe, emerging research efforts in the areas of
nanotechnology, life sciences, and other IT-related areas,
and a new tax treaty, the country offers U.S. companies an
important gateway into Europe.
If consulted early and regularly, the Netherlands can also be an important ally in navigating the EU's regulatory environment and removing
obstacles.

DRUGS AND TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
--------------------------------

14. (S) Narcotics and trafficking in persons remain areas of
difficulty.  Despite fundamental differences regarding "soft
drugs" and legalized prostitution, the Balkenende government
has worked to prevent these differences from defining our
relationship.  There are also signs that Dutch attitudes may
be shifting.  The Dutch remain a major producer of synthetic
drugs.  On the other hand, Dutch Health Minister Hoogevorst
recently signed a precedent-setting MOU with the U.S. to
share information on the health risks of new strains of
marijuana with higher concentrations of THC, which may
convince the Dutch to rethink their approach to "soft drugs"
in general.  The Dutch are addressing drug tourism -- a
recent proposal to restrict the sale of marijuana to Dutch
passport holders in Maastricht, for example, could cut down
on cross-border smuggling and other drug-related crime.  We
should support such initiatives actively.

BALKENENDE SOLID INTERNATIONALLY...
-----------------------------------

15. (S)  We are fortunate to have in the Balkenende
government an outward-looking partner for whom working with
the U.S. and the U.K. comes naturally.  Balkenende and FM Bot
take pride in building bridges between the U.S. and Europe.
Nowhere was this more evident than during the Dutch
presidency of the EU.  On two issues of great importance to
the U.S. -- the China Arms Embargo and accession talks for
Turkey -- the Dutch moved, with our active urging, from
following an EU "consensus" set by others to redefining the
issue on their, and our, terms.  In both cases, Bot and
Balkenende overcame initial skepticism and concluded that
Dutch and U.S. interests coincided -- a pattern we have seen
repeated on other less important issues.  FM Bot began the EU
presidency telling us that lifting the Arms Embargo was a
"done deal."  Later, however, he actively intervened to
prevent a lift on "his" watch, saying that he did not want
the blame for causing a rift between the U.S. and EU.
Despite Balkenende's personal skepticism about bringing
Turkey into the EU, he and Bot (a former Ambassador to
Turkey) worked hard to ensure that Turkey got its date to
start accession talks with the EU during the Dutch
presidency, and want to see the agreement they helped
negotiate successfully implemented.  We will want the Dutch
to continue to draw on the relationships they developed
during the presidency to coax both sides to move in the right
direction as October 3 approaches.

16. (S) Specific U.S. policies provoke squalls of anger and
frustration here, but President Bush's visit to the
Netherlands in 2005 to commemorate V-E day at the WWII Dutch
American Cemetery at Margraten was met with universal acclaim
and provoked remarkably little protest.  Even Dutch opposed
to U.S. policies warmly welcomed the visit as a reminder of
enduring, shared values forged in the crucibles of World War
II and the Cold War.  This mission has pursued an ambitious
program of outreach to future Dutch leaders to ensure that
these emotions are passed to the next generation.  In this
effort, the President's youth roundtable in Maastricht and
former Secretary of State Powell's town hall meeting with
young leaders in The Hague were notable successes, which can
serve as models for future efforts.  Given the
disproportionate influence wielded by the Dutch in
international fora, we should expand our active exchange
programs (including the Fulbright and International Visitor
Leadership Programs) to help shape the successor generation.

...BUT FACES DOMESTIC CHALLENGES
--------------------------------

17. (S) Unfortunately, the outward-looking, transatlantic
orientation of the Balkenende cabinet is offset domestically
by strong strains of Euro-centralism and Dutch-provincialism.
 This division will become more pronounced as the parties
prepare for local elections in March 2006, and national
elections in May 2007.  Current polls show that Balkenende's
center-right coalition (his second government) is falling in
the polls, while the main, center-left opposition Labor party
(PvdA) and fringes on the right and left are gaining.
Balkenende is gambling that his economic reform agenda will
pay dividends in time for the 2007 elections, but that is
uncertain.  There is a strong chance that a center-left
government dominated by the PvdA will come to power in 2007
-- or earlier if the 2006 local election results prompt
national elections.

18. (S) Although U.S.-Dutch relations should remain
fundamentally sound despite a shift to the center-left, a
PvdA-led government would present new challenges.  PvdA
leader Wouter Bos has made clear his tendency to look to
Brussels first in setting Dutch international priorities.  He
sees the Netherlands less as a transatlantic "bridge builder"
than as a follower of EU consensus.  As with Schroeder in
Germany, Bos might also find it tempting to adopt a critical
attitude toward the U.S. during elections to lock in his left
flank.  The PvdA is already raising allegations of U.S.
abuses to challenge the rationale for Dutch deployments in
Afghanistan, and does not support the JSF program.  It is in
our interest both to support the current government's
transatlantic orientation and to engage actively with the
opposition to shift them in a favorable direction.

THE ISLAMIC FACTOR
------------------

19. (S) A new, but potentially serious factor in Dutch
domestic politics is its large, poorly integrated Muslim
population, currently numbering just under 1 million, or 5.8
percent of the population.  USG-sponsored polls show that 83
percent of Dutch Muslims identify much more strongly with
their religion than with their host country, while 51 percent
have little or no faith in the Dutch government as an
institution.  While the problems of Dutch integration
captured international headlines following the van Gogh
murder, the Dutch believe they have an early start on the
rest of Europe in seeking creative ways to address these
concerns.  Their strong interest in sharing and soliciting
ideas has opened up opportunities for Embassy and USG
outreach and consultations throughout Dutch society,
providing insights into a growing problem throughout Europe.
We expect our experiences here will provide good indications
of broader European trends as well as opportunities to
influence their direction.

CONCLUSIONS
-----------

20. (S)  The Netherlands is a complicated, multi-layered
society.  Prevailing myths about the Dutch -- e.g., they are
homogenous, universally tolerant, pacifist, etc.-- do not
accurately gauge differences within society or reflect Dutch
potential to influence international events.  While the Dutch
prefer to see themselves as "balancing" between Europe and
the U.S., this balance can shift due to domestic and
international factors.

21. (S) The key to maximizing Dutch effectiveness is to
involve them early through high-level consultations and
exchanges.  Dutch pragmatism and our similar world-views make
the Netherlands fertile ground for initiatives others in
Europe might be reluctant, at least initially, to embrace.

22. (S) As multipliers, the Dutch should be encouraged to
play an increasingly prominent role on the global stage.
Coaxing the Dutch into the spotlight can take effort, but
pays off royally.  Dutch credentials, credibility, and
capabilities make them effective leaders across a wide range
of geographic regions and substantive issues.

23. (S) The Dutch are actively and favorably involved in
Afghanistan, Africa, Iraq, the Middle East, the Balkans, the
Caribbean, Indonesia, and elsewhere.  They are our best
partner in developing pilot projects in the counterterrorism
area, and are world leaders in development, free trade,
international law and human rights.  In pursuit of U.S.
interests in all these areas of interest and leadership, we
should build upon our successes to date to take the Dutch to
the "next level."

SOBEL


Content
Raw content
Metadata
Print
Share
Show Headers
1. (S) SUMMARY: With the EU divided and its direction uncertain, the Dutch serve as a vital transatlantic anchor in Europe. As one of the original six EU members, the Dutch ally with the British to counter Franco-German efforts to steer Europe off a transatlantic course. The Netherlands' solid European and international credentials create a powerful "multiplier" effect. In Iraq, Dutch forces provided the physical and political cover for Japan to deploy and the Dutch are using their NATO Training Mission commitment to push others to do more. In Afghanistan, the Dutch drove much of the Phase III planning for ISAF and deployed Dutch troops in combat operations for the first time in more than 30 years. The Dutch have led Europe in launching pilot projects to strengthen international counterterrorism cooperation, and initiated the U.S.-EU dialogue on terrorist financing which laid the groundwork for a proposed major international Terrorism Financing Conference in 2006. 2. (S) (SUMMARY CONTINUED) The Dutch are expanding their leadership beyond Europe. Dutch strategic interests in the Caribbean make them logical partners to counter Venezuelan meddling in the region. They are expanding their military involvement in Africa, in part to provide a secure environment for their robust development assistance program, and in part to add "eyes and ears" on the ground. In the Middle East, the Dutch enjoy good relations with Israel and the Palestinians and would welcome a more active role; they quickly promised funds for an expanded Multinational Observer Force (MFO) and might, under the right circumstances, commit troops. Even in areas where we disagree, such as drugs and trafficking in persons, Dutch views may be shifting. As the headquarters for major international legal institutions, the Netherlands offers a unique opportunity for advancing foreign policy goals far beyond Dutch borders. 3. (S) (SUMMARY CONTINUED) The coalition government, headed by PM Balkenende, is naturally inclined to work closely with the U.S. The balance could shift toward Brussels, however, if a center-left government comes to power in 2007 (or earlier), as predicted by most polls. The nearly one million Muslim immigrants are largely non-integrated, which is forcing the Dutch to question long-standing assumptions about Dutch "tolerance" and "identity." The murder of Theo van Gogh focused attention on Islamic extremism, and the Dutch feel they are ahead of much of Europe in addressing this growing problem. Strengthening U.S.-Dutch ties across the political spectrum is necessary to ensure that the Dutch continue to enlist others to pursue interests in line with the U.S., especially in the political-military sphere. Early and active consultations are the key to harnessing Dutch energies in enhanced pursuit of U.S. interests. END SUMMARY. LEADERS IN EUROPE ----------------- 4. (S) Along with the British, the Dutch form a strong, reliable transatlantic anchor in Europe. As a founding member of NATO, one of the original six members of the EU, and Britain's strongest ally on continent, the Dutch are an influential voice in Europe despite having a population of just under 16 million. Prime Minister Balkenende states often that the Dutch "take their responsibilities seriously" and therefore expect to be heard. While the Dutch "no" to the EU's constitutional treaty embarrassed Balkenende, the vote revealed that the search for EU integration and consensus has its limits, capping a trend that started in the 90's with then Liberal Party leader (and later EU Commissioner) Fritz Bolkestein's proposals to redefine the scope of European integration to protect Dutch national interests. 5. (S) With the French-German engine of European integration stalled, German elections pending, and the EU unable to agree on finances, leadership opportunities for the Dutch are growing. This trend is enhanced by the gravitation of EU decision making to smaller groups, as Dutch participation can make or break internal groupings. The Dutch and Italian refusal to attend a "group of six" meeting recently proposed by Schroeder, for example, effectively squelched his initiative. The British Ambassador here recently confided that Blair sees the Dutch as essential to pursuing his European objectives and ensuring that transatlantic relations remain high on the European agenda. The leaders of the Netherlands, UK, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden already meet quietly several times a year to coordinate positions prior to EU Council and other high-level EU meetings. 6. (S) Dutch leadership within the EU does not weaken their commitment to NATO, where they are "go-to guys" for resolving potential EU-NATO conflicts. Their active, if often behind the scenes, support for NATO SYG (and former Dutch Foreign Minister) Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, as well as their commitment to the NRF (and SRF, ISAF, and NTM-I), have helped push back efforts, such as Tervuren, which might otherwise create tensions between the NRF and EU battlegroups or other emerging ESDP capabilities. Foreign Minister Bot recently proposed restructuring NATO's decision-making and funding mechanisms to make them more effective. The appointment of Herman Schaper, the former deputy director general of political affairs at the Dutch MFA and a good friend of the U.S., as the new Dutch permrep to NATO should create more opportunities for productive cooperation. POLITICAL-MILITARY COOPERATION BEYOND THE EU -------------------------------------------- 7. (S) The Dutch are increasingly aware that strategic interests outside Europe warrant their attention and leadership, especially in the political-military sphere. For example: - Venezuela: The Dutch have strategic interests in the Caribbean (i.e., the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba) and are deeply concerned about Chavez' meddling in the region. As a Caribbean power, the Dutch have good reasons to lead an effort to balance traditional Spanish dominance on Latin American issues in the EU, but the U.S. and others will need to push them to take this role. The Dutch are active partners in regional drug enforcement efforts, and recently demonstrated their ability to deploy military forces (F-16's) on short notice. Persuading the Dutch to counter Chavez's destabilization efforts more actively would give us a reliable European partner in the region. - Afghanistan: According to CENTCOM, the Dutch took a strong lead in organizing and soliciting forces to staff ISAF Phase III, and are now preparing to deploy up to 1,400 personnel in conjunction with British, Canadian, and possibly Australian forces. Separately, the Dutch deployment of Special Forces in a combat role represents a major shift in Dutch priorities away from peace-keeping to combat missions for the first time since the 1960's. The Dutch remain a strong supporter in the war on terrorism in Afghanistan. We should encourage them both to continue to make significant contributions, and to push others to do more. - Africa: Senior Dutch military officials say they are considering expanding their military presence in Africa to include Burundi, Rwanda, Eastern Congo, Botswana, Zambia, and Ivory Coast, adding new "eyes and ears" on the ground. The Dutch have requested embedding a cell at EUCOM (similar to that already operating in CENTCOM) to coordinate their actions with the U.S. and other allies. One objective of the Dutch military deployments is to provide a secure environment for what is already one of the most ambitious assistance programs in the world. The Dutch are the fourth largest provider of assistance to Africa world-wide. In 2005 they established a 110 million Euro Stability Fund for security sector reform in the African Great Lakes Region and Sudan (as well as Afghanistan and Iraq.) Dutch deployments in Africa have solid support in Parliament, while the focus on security as an aspect of development provides an attractive justification for potential European partners. We should not only encourage the Dutch to increase their direct involvement in Africa, but also explore whether the Dutch could act as a "clearinghouse" for other interested parties. - Iraq: The Dutch were instrumental in providing early logistic support to U.S. forces in Iraq (including permitting transshipments through Rotterdam when other ports in Europe would not.) The Dutch deployed 1,200 troops directly to the southern province of al-Muthanna for 20 months, including two controversial extensions. Although the Dutch have since withdrawn from al-Muthanna, their presence provided the political and military cover necessary for Japan to commit forces. The Dutch provided 25 trainers for the NATO Training Mission in Iraq, and have offered to provide up to 100 if other countries would make comparable contributions. We should urge the Dutch to continue to push their EU and NATO partners to do more in Iraq. - Middle East: The Dutch enjoy a reputation for "balance" almost unique in Europe, as they are strong supporters of Israel, yet trusted by Arabs. Given Foreign Minister Bot's expressed willingness to take a more active regional role. We should look for opportunities to harness Dutch interest through participation in the Forum for the Future and other initiatives. The Dutch have already promised to make a financial contribution to an expanded Multinational Observer Force (MFO) if asked, and, under the right circumstances, might be prepared to send peace-keepers to the region as well. 8. (S) These commitments demonstrate how the Dutch "take their responsibilities seriously" in practice by committing real resources -- money, troops, hardware, and political capital -- to tackle real problems, as well as their "multiplier" effect in the political-military realm. The fact that the Dutch are providing the head (Peter Feith) and observers to the EU's new monitoring mission in Aceh is the latest example of their assuming leadership of an important international mission in a region where they feel special ties (as witnessed by FM Bot's historic decision this year to attend the commemoration of Indonesian independence, the first such visit by a senior Dutch official since Indonesian independence). 9. (S) The Dutch have one of the largest, most geographically diverse deployments of military forces in the world, with more troops deployed as a percentage of their total forces than any other ally. Defense Minister Kamp and CHOD Berlijn recently restructured the Dutch military to eliminate layers of bureaucracy, including independent service chiefs, thereby creating a leaner, more deployable force. Kamp and Berlijn believe firmly in the "use or lose" principle, and have accordingly sought increasingly challenging operations -- such as the Special Forces deployment to Afghanistan and potential operations in sub-Saharan Africa. Their desire to maximize the military's capabilities and their preference for U.S. equipment, even when alternative European suppliers exist, make the Dutch strong supporters of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program. The Dutch are one of only two countries (Italy is the other) whose financial contributions merit Tier II status in JSF development. Berlijn is pushing to lock in an early commitment for 50 planes (out of a total of 85) to prevent JSF from becoming an issue in the 2007 elections. The Dutch are also seeking Tactical Tomahawks for Dutch frigates, additional lift capacity (CH-47, C-130, KDC-10), and are continuing to update their remaining hardware (AH-64D, F-16's, Patriot Missile System, etc.) all of which are focused on meeting their Prague Capability Commitment objectives as well as their ability to sustain extended expeditionary operations outside the European theater. COUNTERTERRORISM COOPERATION ---------------------------- 10. (S) Faced with growing threats in their own country, as witnessed by the murder of Theo van Gogh in November 2004, the Dutch believe they are in the forefront of Europe with regard to counterterrorism, arguing that legislation and other steps earlier adopted by the Dutch are only now being considered in countries like the UK and Italy. Led by Justice Minister Donner and Finance Minister Zalm, the Dutch were the first in Europe to implement the Container Security Initiative (CSI), Radiological Gates, DOE's Megaports program, U.S. Customs' Green Lane Program, and, soon, Trusted Flyers. China has engaged the Dutch on next generation protocols and standards for transport security, includng RFID technology. It will be important to monitor and work with the Dutch as they work with China. The Dutch have also expressed an interest to participate in DHS's "Centers of Excellence." While the EU was arguing with us and itself over releasing personal records to airlines, the Dutch allowed U.S. immigration teams (IAP) to operate at Schipol airport. The Dutch were instrumental in pushing the EU in 2003 to designate Hamas in its entirety as a terrorist entity; an EU-wide designation of the Dutch branch of the Al-Aqsa followed. During their EU Presidency the Dutch hosted an EU-wide seminar to raise awareness of terrorist financing issues and have offered to host a major international conference on the same subject in 2006. The Dutch continue to push for EU designation of Hizballah in its entirety and to strengthen the EU's "Clearinghouse" designation process. Given their record, we should continue to look to the Dutch to launch joint pilot programs in Europe, and, more generally, to push counterterrorism issues to the top of the European agenda more generally. DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE ---------------------- 11. (S) The Netherlands is among the world's leading aid donors, having budgeted USD 4.2 billion (0.74 percent of GDP, with a target of raising it to 0.8 percent) in assistance in 2004. It is a top donor of unearmarked assistance to UN humanitarian programs. In 2003, the Netherlands introduced a more focused aid strategy, which phased out smaller aid programs in wealthier countries. Dutch bilateral aid is now directed to 36 partner countries, including 18 in Africa. In 2003, President Bush and Prime Minister Balkenende signed an MOU to coordinate HIV/AIDS programs in Ghana, Zambia, Rwanda and Ethiopia that emphasizes public-private partnerships. Balkenende recently expressed interest in using the Millennium Challenge Corporation as a model for promoting public-private partnerships world-wide. USAID's involvement with a Heineken AIDS treatment and education program in Rwanda has been particularly successful, and the World Bank has adopted it as a model. Dutch creativity and credibility in development makes them good potential partners for future joint initiatives with the U.S. We should also take advantage of their experience and insights to help shift global aid efforts in the direction of sustainable long-term development. CENTER OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS -------------------------------------------- 12. (S) With the International Court of Justice (ICJ), International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), the Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal, the International Criminal Court (ICC) and other international legal institutions all located in The Hague, our ability to have an impact in the Netherlands on international issues ranging from Iraq to the Balkans is unique. With a historical interest in international law dating back to Grotius, the Dutch view themselves as natural defenders of international legal norms and practices. This tradition made them the perfect hosts for a conference of Iraqi judges in The Hague in 2004, and has pushed them to the forefront of international efforts to train a new generation of Iraqi jurists. While their legalistic approach can be frustrating, they are flexible. Their concerns about U.S. interpretations of the Geneva Protocols have not prevented their Special Forces from deploying in Afghanistan. The Dutch also helped sway the EU to vote against the Cuban-sponsored resolution on Guantanamo at the Human Rights Commission last year despite concerns about the treatment of detainees. But, as Foreign Minister Bot told Deputy Secretary Zoellick recently, over the long run Dutch human rights concerns must be addressed to ensure that public and parliamentary support does not erode; we and the Dutch need to work together to resolve this concern. Finally, the Dutch combination of seeking pragmatic solutions while remaining true to their legal principles could make the Dutch an important asset in resolving our differences with the EU over the ICC and article 98 agreements under the right circumstances. ECONOMICS AND TRADE ------------------- 13. (S) Balkenende shares our interest in promoting an open international trading system and has been an ally in U.S.-EU trade disputes such as Boeing-Airbus and the Foreign Sales Corporation Tax. The Dutch share with the British a vision of a market-friendly Europe driven by free trade. They are the third largest investor in the U.S. and the fourth largest recipient of U.S. investment world-wide. Their efforts to shift the Lisbon agenda in a more cooperative direction and to promote innovation and competition are creating additional opportunities for U.S. investors in Europe. Because the Netherlands has one of the highest broadband penetrations in Europe, emerging research efforts in the areas of nanotechnology, life sciences, and other IT-related areas, and a new tax treaty, the country offers U.S. companies an important gateway into Europe. If consulted early and regularly, the Netherlands can also be an important ally in navigating the EU's regulatory environment and removing obstacles. DRUGS AND TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS -------------------------------- 14. (S) Narcotics and trafficking in persons remain areas of difficulty. Despite fundamental differences regarding "soft drugs" and legalized prostitution, the Balkenende government has worked to prevent these differences from defining our relationship. There are also signs that Dutch attitudes may be shifting. The Dutch remain a major producer of synthetic drugs. On the other hand, Dutch Health Minister Hoogevorst recently signed a precedent-setting MOU with the U.S. to share information on the health risks of new strains of marijuana with higher concentrations of THC, which may convince the Dutch to rethink their approach to "soft drugs" in general. The Dutch are addressing drug tourism -- a recent proposal to restrict the sale of marijuana to Dutch passport holders in Maastricht, for example, could cut down on cross-border smuggling and other drug-related crime. We should support such initiatives actively. BALKENENDE SOLID INTERNATIONALLY... ----------------------------------- 15. (S) We are fortunate to have in the Balkenende government an outward-looking partner for whom working with the U.S. and the U.K. comes naturally. Balkenende and FM Bot take pride in building bridges between the U.S. and Europe. Nowhere was this more evident than during the Dutch presidency of the EU. On two issues of great importance to the U.S. -- the China Arms Embargo and accession talks for Turkey -- the Dutch moved, with our active urging, from following an EU "consensus" set by others to redefining the issue on their, and our, terms. In both cases, Bot and Balkenende overcame initial skepticism and concluded that Dutch and U.S. interests coincided -- a pattern we have seen repeated on other less important issues. FM Bot began the EU presidency telling us that lifting the Arms Embargo was a "done deal." Later, however, he actively intervened to prevent a lift on "his" watch, saying that he did not want the blame for causing a rift between the U.S. and EU. Despite Balkenende's personal skepticism about bringing Turkey into the EU, he and Bot (a former Ambassador to Turkey) worked hard to ensure that Turkey got its date to start accession talks with the EU during the Dutch presidency, and want to see the agreement they helped negotiate successfully implemented. We will want the Dutch to continue to draw on the relationships they developed during the presidency to coax both sides to move in the right direction as October 3 approaches. 16. (S) Specific U.S. policies provoke squalls of anger and frustration here, but President Bush's visit to the Netherlands in 2005 to commemorate V-E day at the WWII Dutch American Cemetery at Margraten was met with universal acclaim and provoked remarkably little protest. Even Dutch opposed to U.S. policies warmly welcomed the visit as a reminder of enduring, shared values forged in the crucibles of World War II and the Cold War. This mission has pursued an ambitious program of outreach to future Dutch leaders to ensure that these emotions are passed to the next generation. In this effort, the President's youth roundtable in Maastricht and former Secretary of State Powell's town hall meeting with young leaders in The Hague were notable successes, which can serve as models for future efforts. Given the disproportionate influence wielded by the Dutch in international fora, we should expand our active exchange programs (including the Fulbright and International Visitor Leadership Programs) to help shape the successor generation. ...BUT FACES DOMESTIC CHALLENGES -------------------------------- 17. (S) Unfortunately, the outward-looking, transatlantic orientation of the Balkenende cabinet is offset domestically by strong strains of Euro-centralism and Dutch-provincialism. This division will become more pronounced as the parties prepare for local elections in March 2006, and national elections in May 2007. Current polls show that Balkenende's center-right coalition (his second government) is falling in the polls, while the main, center-left opposition Labor party (PvdA) and fringes on the right and left are gaining. Balkenende is gambling that his economic reform agenda will pay dividends in time for the 2007 elections, but that is uncertain. There is a strong chance that a center-left government dominated by the PvdA will come to power in 2007 -- or earlier if the 2006 local election results prompt national elections. 18. (S) Although U.S.-Dutch relations should remain fundamentally sound despite a shift to the center-left, a PvdA-led government would present new challenges. PvdA leader Wouter Bos has made clear his tendency to look to Brussels first in setting Dutch international priorities. He sees the Netherlands less as a transatlantic "bridge builder" than as a follower of EU consensus. As with Schroeder in Germany, Bos might also find it tempting to adopt a critical attitude toward the U.S. during elections to lock in his left flank. The PvdA is already raising allegations of U.S. abuses to challenge the rationale for Dutch deployments in Afghanistan, and does not support the JSF program. It is in our interest both to support the current government's transatlantic orientation and to engage actively with the opposition to shift them in a favorable direction. THE ISLAMIC FACTOR ------------------ 19. (S) A new, but potentially serious factor in Dutch domestic politics is its large, poorly integrated Muslim population, currently numbering just under 1 million, or 5.8 percent of the population. USG-sponsored polls show that 83 percent of Dutch Muslims identify much more strongly with their religion than with their host country, while 51 percent have little or no faith in the Dutch government as an institution. While the problems of Dutch integration captured international headlines following the van Gogh murder, the Dutch believe they have an early start on the rest of Europe in seeking creative ways to address these concerns. Their strong interest in sharing and soliciting ideas has opened up opportunities for Embassy and USG outreach and consultations throughout Dutch society, providing insights into a growing problem throughout Europe. We expect our experiences here will provide good indications of broader European trends as well as opportunities to influence their direction. CONCLUSIONS ----------- 20. (S) The Netherlands is a complicated, multi-layered society. Prevailing myths about the Dutch -- e.g., they are homogenous, universally tolerant, pacifist, etc.-- do not accurately gauge differences within society or reflect Dutch potential to influence international events. While the Dutch prefer to see themselves as "balancing" between Europe and the U.S., this balance can shift due to domestic and international factors. 21. (S) The key to maximizing Dutch effectiveness is to involve them early through high-level consultations and exchanges. Dutch pragmatism and our similar world-views make the Netherlands fertile ground for initiatives others in Europe might be reluctant, at least initially, to embrace. 22. (S) As multipliers, the Dutch should be encouraged to play an increasingly prominent role on the global stage. Coaxing the Dutch into the spotlight can take effort, but pays off royally. Dutch credentials, credibility, and capabilities make them effective leaders across a wide range of geographic regions and substantive issues. 23. (S) The Dutch are actively and favorably involved in Afghanistan, Africa, Iraq, the Middle East, the Balkans, the Caribbean, Indonesia, and elsewhere. They are our best partner in developing pilot projects in the counterterrorism area, and are world leaders in development, free trade, international law and human rights. In pursuit of U.S. interests in all these areas of interest and leadership, we should build upon our successes to date to take the Dutch to the "next level." SOBEL

7 comments:


  1. Het staat er allemaal heel duidelijk:

    Strengthening U.S.-Dutch ties across the

    political spectrum is necessary to ensure that the Dutch

    continue to enlist others to pursue interests in line with

    the U.S., especially in the political-military sphere. Early

    and active consultations are the key to harnessing Dutch

    energies in enhanced pursuit of U.S. interests.

    *****

    Voor de goede orde: De VS doet hier wat in haar belang is en wat je legaal onder 'diplomatie' zou mogen vatten.
    (Dat denk ik toch)

    De vraag is of Balkenende cs hier zo graag aan mee moesten werken. Lijkt me duidelijk van niet.
    In 2005 waren er al volop ionsiders ( minister Meacher in Engeland, minister Von Bulow in Duitsland, oud premier Cossiga van Italië) die zeiden: 9/11 is een inside job.
    Ik weet niet of het PNAC Report toen al bekend was.

    Dat had op zijn minst terughoudendheid bij Balkenende moeten genereren.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wikileaks:

    The leaders of the

    Netherlands, UK, Norway, Denmark, and Sweden already meet

    quietly several times a year to coordinate positions prior to

    EU Council and other high-level EU meetings.

    Dat noemen we nu een samenzwering: een kleine groep die stiekem samen een standpunt bespreekt en dan, als de hele groep bij elkaar is, net doet alsof ze oprecht en vanuit zichzelf - die mening zijn toegedaan. Wat als enkele landen tijdens dat geheime vooroverleg eerst iets anders vinden ? Dan worden ze bewerkt tot ze overstag gaan.
    En later, in de plenaire vergadering, wordt de rest overdonderd. Dan wekt vooral de eensgezindheid van die 6 landen de indruk dat het 'gesneden koek' is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mag ik U voorstellen: een man van wie ik fan ben.

    Dit is de eerste keer dat ik hem zie spreken en hoor spreken.

    Het gaat gemoedelijk, beetje traag zelfs.
    Maar na 31 minuten heb je veel bijgeleerd.

    Unz zegt: Mensen kun je nauwelijks van mening doen veranderen. ( Denk aan de spreuk van Tolstoy. Denk aan Confirmation bias. JV)

    Maar als je met harde cijfers komt, dan hebben de MSM ineens wel interesse, of kun je iets veranderen door bijv. een rechtszaak aan te spannen.

    Twee voorbeelden:
    1) Iedereen riep dat Hispanics erg veel crime pleegden.
    MSM ( politiek correct) wilden er niet over schrijven en het zeker niet onderzoeken, want bang dat het klopte.

    Unz onderzocht het statistisch en wat bleek: Hispanics zijn niet meer crimineel dan blanken.
    Waar zat de clou? Misdaden pleeg je tussen de 18 en 35 jaar. En dat is de leeftijd van al die hispanic immigrants.

    2)
    De toelating op Universiteiten zou meritocratisch zijn. Maar terwijl het aantal jonge Aziaten verdubbelde, nam hun aandeel in de Ivy League universiteiten niet toe.
    Wat blijkt? Er is enorme corruptie bij de toelating. Daarover wordt beslist op niet transparante wijze, door weinig verdienende mensen. Het is 'designed for corruption'. ( Unz zegt in de toespraak bij Misis Institute niet da de joden de grote profiteurs waren.)
    Nu is er een rechtszaak aangespannen tegen Harvard, en zal het wellicht allemaal veranderen.
    UNZ: Maar als je al 30 jaar een elite hebt die middels corruptie zijn baantjes kreeg, dan krijg je een corrupt land.

    Dan heeft hij ontdekt dat er 100 jaar geleden veel meer Magazines waren dan de afgelopen 60 jaar. Er zijn er dus al heel veel verdwenen. Meer dan 90% is al lang weg.
    Nog veel opmerkelijker: Al die 90% verdwenen magazines publiceerden zaken die wij nu als erg alternatief beschouwen . Het lijkt wel conspiracy. Het lijkt op de huidige alternatieve internet media. Terwijl die toen toch mainstream waren, met schrijvers van hoog aanzien.

    Het blijkt dat we 100 jaar geleden een veel veelzijdiger idee over de wereld hadden.
    Laat ons onze huidige alternatieve media in ere houden!

    Tenslotte: Unz wijst er op dat de laatste presidenten ( Obama, Trump) altijd een heel nieuwe agenda hadden: meer vrede, goede relaties met Rusland etc.
    Maar nà hun verkiezing doen ze toch iets anders. Unz zegt: Het lijkt er op dat die Deep State echt bestaat en de macht heeft.

    Youtube: ( 31 minuten)
    Building a main stream audience for alternative ideas Ron Unz.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ( Origineel: bij Blik.)
    Mijn opinie over de zaak is vrij simpel:

    Een kleine uitwisseling van bevolking is veel beter dan geen uitwisseling.
    Maar massa-immigratie is echt foute boel.
    Dat wordt door de Elite nagestreefd om twee doelen te bereiken:
    1) Goedkope arbeidskrachten halen
    2) De eenheid van een volk teniet doen, waarna het geen kans maakt om als één blok in opstand te komen tegen een elite
    3) Door de verschillende groepen in een land kan de Elite de groepen tegen elkaar opzetten en zo zelf de macht behouden.

    Ik vind het actieve massa-immigratie nastreven een gruwelijk misdrijf, omdat zowel de immigranten als de autochtonen in een land komen te wonen dat niet past bij hun aangeboren gedragsvoorkeuren.

    Een cultuur moet passen bij de aangeboren eigenschappen: temperament, arbeidslust, agressie, IQ etc.

    Een joke om het duidelijk te maken:
    Sam Savelkoul was uit Duitsland gevlucht voor Hitler, en kwam terecht in de VS waar het hem goed ging. Mooi bedrijfje opgebouwd. Toen hij oud was vroeg zijn zoon: : Daddy, are you happy now ? "
    Sam zei: "Yes, I am happy , aber glücklich bin ich nicht. "
    De Amerikaanse leven is erg oppervlakkig en niet te vergelijken met het rijke joodse leven in duitsland tijdens de Weimar republiek.

    We hebben toch allemaal de ervaring dat we ons bij sommige mensen ,. die genetisch dichter bij ons staan, (of qua klasse ) meer thuis voelen dan bij mensen die verder van ons vandaan staan.

    Massa immigratie zorgt dat we nog wel happy kunnen worden, maar niet meer glücklich. Het wordt allemaal gemaakt en oppervlakkig.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ter verduidelijking:
      De Elite bestaat uit bedrijven die arbeidskrachten nodig hebben, maar ook uit usual suspects, die wellicht alleen een mensenhaat of afkeer van de goyim als leidraad / instinct hebben.

      ( Nogmaals : bekijk Defamation, waar de Israelische jongeren in Polen in Auschwitz op bezoek zijn: die kinderen denken dat de Polen hen elk moment kunnen aanvallen. Volledig paranoide gemaakt door hun omgeving. )

      Ja, je hebt gelijk: De Westerse landen zullen met zekerheid hun dominantie moeten afstaan aan de Chinezen en Aziaten.

      Dan val je terug op je eigen volk, je eigen natie.
      Als je geluk hebt is dat een vrij homogeen volk waardoor solidariteit een kans maakt.
      Dan leef je verder, een sober leven. kan ook. En we hebben een goed IQ, dus dat moet lukken.

      Maar als dat een heterogeen volk is, dan kan het een hel op aarde worden.
      Met dank aan de usual suspects !

      Maar misschien moet ik harder zijn: de evolutie is keihard. We zijn gezakt voor het examen. Wij bleken DoDo's te zijn: vrolijk waggelend onze ondergang tegemoet.
      We zijn gewoon te dom gebleken. Te naïef is misschien beter getypeerd. Te lichtgelovig. Men kan ons te gemakkelijk om de tuin leiden. Dat is onze ondergang.

      De Big Corp en de Kosmopolieten zitten niet op onze tak. Zolang er bomen zijn in de wereld, kunnen ze zitten.

      Dat is ook belangrijk om te noteren: De strijd tussen arm en Rijk is van alle tijden. Maar zolang de Rijken zouden sterven als ze alle armen uitroeiden, was er een zekere bescherming. Die tijd is voorbij. De armen zijn niet van belang, want de Rijken wonen 'in de hele wereld.'

      Delete
  5. Westphalian sovereignty, or state sovereignty, is the principle in international law that each nation state has exclusive sovereignty over its territory. The principle underlies the modern international system of sovereign states and is enshrined in the United Nations Charter, which states that "nothing should authorise intervention in matters essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state."[1] Every state, no matter how large or small, has an equal right to sovereignty.[2] Political scientists have traced the concept to the Peace of Westphalia (1648), which ended the Thirty Years' War. The principle of non-interference was further developed in the 18th century. The Westphalian system reached its peak in the 19th and 20th centuries, but it has faced recent challenges from advocates of humanitarian intervention.

    ReplyDelete
  6. http://thesaker.is/the-waves-of-time/

    Napoleon’s emancipation of the Jews in France, following the French Revolution.

    Actually, already in 1791, in the midst of the Revolution, the National Assembly had granted Jews full citizenship. It was hoped that, by so doing, Jews would stop acting like a separate nation within France. But soon there were complaints that the Jews were stuck in their old ways, particularly in Alsace and Lorraine, where their majority lived. Their ‘old ways’ referred to usury, or, as we would say today ‘financial engineering’, or ‘banking shenanigans’.

    The situation remained fluid and uncertain till Napoleon, converted from a servant of the Republic into an Emperor, convened, in 1807, what he called the Great Sanhedrin, to resolve the controversial issues arisen from the emancipation. The Great Sanhedrin refers to the governing body of the Jewish community, notably during the Roman Empire.

    To a council of 71 Jewish leaders and rabbis, Napoleon posed 12 questions about their laws and customs. Some questions were amusing – for example, were Jews allowed to have more than one wife? The main issue, however, was whether Jews born in France, and now treated by law as citizens, would regard France as their country. They answered that there was nothing inherent in their religion preventing the full integration of the Jewish community into French life. This was enough to confirm their full recognition and emancipation, along with an obligation to take up French names.

    Perhaps Napoleon ignored that if a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, a Shylock, by any other name would still call for his pound of flesh.

    In fact, there was immediate widespread opposition to the move, in French-ruled Europe and in France itself. Even one of Napoleon’s famous generals, Francois Christophe de Kellerman, whose name is inscribed in the Arc de Triomphe, recommended strongly that the Jews be prohibited from dealing in commerce.

    etc etc

    ReplyDelete