549. Waarom veroorzaken de Neocons al die oorlogen? Wat is het doel?

Bij toeval vond ik deze blog op het internet, toen ik googlede op 'Neocon wars'.
Ik vind het verhaal van  Ian Shilling (ian56) steekhoudend, en plaats het hieronder.

What is the real purpose of the Neocon wars?

We know its not to fight terrorism. Its recruited more terrorists & increased terrorism - see Syria, ISIS, Paris, Jakarta etc. etc.

This guy had a good stab at it:-
Financial collapse leads to war
http://cluborlov.blogspot.ru/2016/01/financial-collapse-leads-to-war.html

He is correct that perpetual war feeds the MIC and that failure to win wars is irrelevant because the media won't call them out on it. And he is correct that it is better for the MIC to fail to win wars because the media will call for more war / escalate the war and to INCREASE military spending to "try harder" on a counter productive strategy. Increasing the military budget, increases the power of the MIC.

The Neocon Agenda and it's results
http://ian56.blogspot.com/2015/04/the-neocon-agenda-and-its-results.html

( Deze blog van ian56 heb ik in zijn geheel hieronder weergegeven)

But he didn't really get to the heart of the matter - I guess, though he is clued up, he was either hiding what he really thinks and toned the article down appropriately or he hasn't thought through things enough yet.

If you have more money than anyone could spend in 100 lifetimes what else do you want?
Sure, the elites always want more money - that's how they compare themselves against other billionaires. But does that give them "job satisfaction"? I think not.
I guess scamming someone or a group of people and making another $10m will give most of them a temporary buzz. But a temporary buzz is not really "it".
The real measurement (in the eyes of the super wealthy) is how much power and influence you wield. How many people you employ and directly control, how many other billionaires you could destroy, how many politicians you can buy.
Real power is to manipulate and control people, no matter how far away the story you are telling is from the truth.
Tell people black is white or up is down and they believe it - that's real power.
Control entire governments - that's real power.
Control entire economies - that's real power.

Orwell clearly laid out the agenda in his book 1984.
The elites want total control.
How do you get total control?
Make people scared of some unseen enemy, so they want a big government to "protect" them.
Create perpetual war - it doesn't matter whether its real or imagined as long as most people believe it is real.
Make them poor so they are too busy working to think, so there are fewer dissenters.
Punish any dissenters or people that can think and have seen through the lies with Room 101 (currently its more likely to be an IRS audit or to get beaten up by the Police or have a SWAT raid).
Spot and discourage any potential dissenters with Big Brother Mass Surveillance.

The purpose of the Neocon Wars IS 1984

 ------------------------------------

The Neocon Agenda and it's results

Neocons are not conservatives - in fact they are the exact opposite of "conservatives". Their agenda is global domination through perpetual war. In order to do this they set out to destabilize the entire Middle East from "Algeria to Afghanistan" - excluding Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.

A second agenda is the undermining of National Sovereignty and Laws in favor of increasing the power of elite bankers and crony Corporate control.

The original Neocons (people like Irving Kristol) were hard left revolutionary trotskyites and members of the Democrat Party. They just switched parties. They are also acolytes of Leo Strauss who advocated a totalitarian regime ruled by a small clique of technocrat "experts". Paul Wolfowitz was originally a "leftie" and was mentored by Strauss at Chicago University. (Loads of bad things have come out of Chicago - Al Capone, Leo Strauss, Paul Wolfowitz, Obama to name but a few. It's still extremely bad. Rahm Emanuel is Mayor & Chicago is bankrupt.)

Neocons completely infest the GOP and totally dominate the leadership of the Democratic Party. They are also ensconced in America's closest Western allies - the UK, Canada and Australia.

Unfortunately the Neocon agenda also requires Corporate Fascist control and $1tn a year of war spending, both of which have totally bankrupted the US. It has also completely shredded the US Bill of Rights and set up a turnkey, defacto Police State (the key has yet to be turned on).

These policies have now hollowed out the US economy to the extent that:-

over 90% of the population has seen a decline in living standards since 2000

the wealth creation powers of the US has all but been eliminated

the rest of the world started owning more of the US than the US owns of the rest of the world since 2000

the US runs a trade deficit of $600bn a year

it has a government deficit of $1tn a year

it wastes over $1tn a year on the military

it wastes over $1tn a year on Corporate Welfare to increase the wealth of the top 0.1%

it wastes over $800bn a year on subsidies to the big banks

well over 50% of the population is now dependent on the government (either via some form of welfare payment or via direct employment or via government contracts for things like arms manufacture or outsourced government "services" like private spy contractors and TSA).

The above has hastened the end of $ hegemony and with it US hegemony, helped accelerate the rise of China and the BRICS, put the US on the path to $3tn (and still exponentially increasing) deficits by 2023, a national debt of $40tn by around 2025, the collapse of the global financial system and the US economy.

A selection of Neocons:-

There are a great many more that could be named, e.g. Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz, John Boehner, Dianne Feinstein, Lindsey Graham, John Brennan (CIA), Ashton Carter (Def Sec), Strobe Talbott (Brookings - Hillary's choice for Sec of State), Mark Comey (FBI), Keith Alexander (ex-NSA), Tony Blair, David Cameron, Stephen Harper, Tony Abbott, Bernard-Henri Levy, over 50 Washington "Think Tanks" (fellows of CFR, AEI, Brookings, Heritage Foundation, Hudson Institute, Carnegie Endowment for War etc.), NED,  - every member of the Senate Foreign Relations, Intelligence and Armed Forces committees, just about every other senior politician in DC, the Op-Ed writers and senior editors for the New York Times, Washington Post, Economist, Wall Street Journal, etc. and every talking head on Fox News. The list is endless.

N.B. Neocons that are members of the Democratic Party like to be called "Neoliberal Interventionists". This just means they are Neocon Fascists who support abortion and gay rights.

Must read article on the history, strategies and agenda of the Neocons:-
“The machiavelian threefold game of the neoconservatives”
http://www.voltairenet.org/article178638.html

Nazi jurist taught Leo Strauss - Neocon mentor
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2003/eirv30n12-20030328/eirv30n12-20030328_055-nazi_jurist_taught_leo_strauss_n.pdf

The Structural Elite power structure and main Neocon events so far: 

The Quigley Formula - G Edward Griffin on Cecil Rhodes, the Round Tables, the CFR and world governance by elites

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynVqPnMQ2sI&feature=youtu.be

Posted 19th April 2015 by Ian Shilling

548 Twijfels over de holocaust.

Do you want to look at all the evidence and form your own opinion? 

Bron: http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/

Whatreallyhappened.info is based in the United Kingdom and devoted to free inquiry into historical events. 

Disclaimer: We link to a wide variety of sites, videos, etc. You may, will, disagree strongly with some of them, since they represent differing viewpoints; you may even find some offensive. Our linking to them in no way implies our support for any views expressed in them. It implies only that we think that viewing them may help us or you to a better understanding of the issues, even where we reject what is said. 

This site exists to promote an open scientific, evidenced-based approach to historical enquiry. We do not believe or reject anything, though naturally we do form opinions. However, they are just that: opinions based on our current understanding of the facts. We are not emotionally attached to them and we would have no problem with changing our current positions on any subject if the evidence suggested we should.

We are mainly, though not exclusively, interested in the Second World War and the German treatment of Jews during that conflict, since this is the area where free enquiry is most actively and efficiently suppressed by force of law and imprisonment in some countries and by taboo in all. The topic is protected from any objective investigation by an electric fence of emotion and insult, with the result that few other than those with a political axe to grind dare question the received story. We have no such axe. We have looked at the orthodox story and at the arguments brought against it by Revisionists, and we find that, at the very least, the Revisionists have raised questions  which so far have not been satisfactorily answered. They are met with insults and ad hominem accusations of political bias, which, even if they are true (they are in some cases but not in others) are irrelevant, since the historical facts of what happened in the 1940s cannot be influenced by anyone's views today on anything. The reality is that those who promote the orthodox story are themselves also largely driven by emotion and political bias. On the whole, whatever their motives, it is the Revisionists, not the proponents of orthodoxy, who have looked for material evidence and applied scientific methodolgy.

We don't like the term Holocaust; we think it represents a dishonest approach used to impose a narrative and to suppress enquiry, rather than encourage actual study of what happened. It has entered the vocabulary relatively recently, promoting a politically-motivated, anti-intellectual, emotional and manipulative memorialism, which was analysed by Dr Norman Finkelstein (a Jewish-American university professor) in his best-selling book The Holocaust Industry.

We are not neo-Nazis; we are not so-called "White Nationalists" or any other kind of racist; we do not believe "it was all a Jewish conspiracy", but we do have genuine and sincere doubts, based on our reading of the historical record and the arguments of both sides, most of which is completely absent from the mass media which serve a hysterical diet of tear-jerking accusations but very few verified facts.

Though individuals behind the site have differing personal views, the one thing we are unanimous on is the right to investigate freely. 

We will also point you to aspects of history that, although indisputably true, are almost entirely absent from the mainstream media. For example, take a look at a map of pre-war Germany and compare it with a map of Germany today. The 15 million Germans in that "missing" area, as well as the Sudetenland and other areas, weredriven out with extreme brutality, including mass rape and murder, by Russians, Poles, Czechs, Serbs and others, with hundreds of thousands, perhaps as many as two million deaths. They too were transported in "cattletrucks" (which were actually goods vans, but that doesn't have the same emotive ring). It was the largest of manydeportations and expulsions in Eastern Europe. They have fallen into history's memory hole. How much have they received in reparations? When did you last see a TV programme, a film or a newspaper article about any of them? The present writer knows of only one: Shadow Over Europe made by Charles Wheeler for BBC4 in 2002. It has only recently become available on YouTube. 

[If the above embedded link is not working, click here]

We welcome views that differ from our own, provided always that they are presented objectively, calmly and courteously without resort to rudeness or invective, and we promise to do our best to show similar courtesy to others. We are looking for historical evidence and dialogue, not polemic and confrontation. We don't seek to demonise, sanctify or whitewash anyone. Not Hitler, not Stalin, not Churchill or anyone else...

 

Do we deny the Holocaust?

Like "Do we still beat our wives (or husbands)?" the question is impossible to answer as it is based on a false assumption. "Holocaust denial" is a simplistic Newspeak term, designed to shut down discussion by falsely presenting the issue as black or white, all or nothing, and implying that anyone questioning any part of it must have malicious motives. The truth is more complex.

Much of what is called the Holocaust did beyond question take place:

• The National Socialist or Nazi regime intensely disliked Jews and prior to the war succeeded in expelling two thirds of them from Germany. They had the cooperation of the Jewish Zionist movement, which wanted Jews to move to Palestine.
• Following the outbreak of war, most Jews in the areas under German control (though not most French Jews) were confined in ghettos, concentration camps and labour camps, where conditions varied from the low standards common in most prisons to the utterly appalling, and where many died (and were cremated) from a wide range of causes which included privation, exposure, disease, neglect, maltreatment (often by the common-criminal prisoners who were placed in authority) and execution.
• The war on the Eastern front was one of the most barbaric wars in history and civilians were routinely killed by both sides as reprisal or simply to spread terror. It was savage warfare, but it has its parallels in Algeria and Vietnam, for example. Given both official and personal attitudes to Jews on the German side, and the high number of Jews among both partisans and Communist commissars, Jews were likely to figure prominently among the victims.
• In 1945, conditions of utter horror, with thousands of unburied emaciated dead, were found when camps such as Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau were liberated. 

We in no way dispute these component parts of the larger event which since about 1980 has become labelled as the Holocaust. 

But other main components are far from "proven beyond reasonable doubt". 

Revisionists argue, with some justification, that there is no material evidence, and only documentary evidence whose provenance has never been adequately tested, that:

• there was mass murder in gas chambers (There were small gas chambers which were used to kill disease-spreading lice in clothing and bedding using Zyklon B, a legitimate commercial product, stabilised hydrogen cyanide, used in all German military facilities and still produced today under the trade name Uragan D2 - uragan is a direct Czech translation of zyklon, cyclone or storm)
• the Nazi regime sought to exterminate the European Jews (or any other group)
• the totemic figure of six million Jewish deaths has a basis in fact
• the appalling conditions with thousands of dead bodies found in Belsen, Buchenwald and Dachau were a consequence of deliberate German brutality or neglect

The last point should not be at issue. All historians and other knowledgeable people now accept that that these horrific scenes were caused by epidemics and starvation in the total collapse of infrastructure at the end of the war and by massive overcrowding as inmates of the camps in Poland were moved to camps in Germany that had no space for them, but little effort has been made to communicate this knowledge to the general public and photographs taken at these camps are regularly and falsely presented in the media as "proof of the Holocaust".
The accusations of mass killing in gas chambers rely entirely on:

• a few depositions by interested parties, who were not cross-examined and often did not even appear in court to present their evidence, 
• confessions of men held for months in solitary confinement and interrogated under duress, and even threatened that their wives and children would be handed to the Russians if they did not cooperate,

• a small number of documents: many simply unverified copies or translations, typed and unsigned, that have never been properly tested for authenticity, presented by American, British or Soviet Intelligence services. Remember the "dodgy dossier" of 2003 and Colin Powell's 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' presentation to the UN General Assembly, the "Kuwaiti baby incubators" of 1991 or, to go further back, the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 and the Suez crisis in 1956? In all of these, governments conspired to justify their actions with false information.

Both gas chambers and extermination were regarded by the Nuremberg Tribunals and the later SS trials in Germany as "facts of common knowledge" and therefore unquestionable. For a defendant to dispute them was a sure way to the hangman's noose or a very long time in prison. The only possible defence or mitigation was to say that these things happened but to deny or play down your own role in them. Some received lighter sentences for confessing or for testifying against others (plea bargaining). The Commandant of Auschwitz, Rudolf Hoess, said at Nuremberg that 3 million had died in the camp of whom 2.5 million were murdered. The official figure today is just over 1 million, with no attempt to distinguish, the public being left to assume that all were gassed. So even if we accept the official figure, we know that Hoess was forced to exaggerate three-fold.

No actual homicidal gas chambers or gas vans have ever been found. The alleged gas chamber at Auschwitz 1, shown to tourists, was "reconstructed" by the Russians in 1947 on the site of a crematorium and morgue, later used as an air raid shelter (with gas-tight door). Until the mid-nineties, it was presented to visitors as "original". [See David Cole's video from 1992 where the Chief Archivist admitted the deception.] Even today the public are encouraged to believe it is in its original state and you will only be told it is a "reconstruction" if you actually ask, or go to a very obscure corner of their web site (last paragraph on that page).[Even this reference has since been removed. The mock-up is referred to simply as "gas chamber and crematorium I"!] At Auschwitz 2 there are only ruins of buildings whose plans and specifications in the Auschwitz Construction Office are for crematoria and morgues, with nothing to identify them as gas chambers; the ovens are standard crematorium design for individual bodies and their capacity is far too low for the mass murderous use claimed for them. Majdanek has gas chambers used to kill lice in clothing and bedding, using Zyklon B, which it is alleged, without evidence, were also used to kill people.

This comes as a great surprise to most people, who have been taught that the Holocaust is "the most documented event in history" and that it is beyond dispute that six million Jews were killed. In reality, thedeportations, the camps and the crematoria are thoroughly documented, but that is all.

Since the universal image of the Nazis as unique symbols of evil incarnate is based on these beliefs, we no longer accept this extreme view of the German Hitlerite regime, though we are certainly are in no way apologists for it: we see it as probably a good deal less murderous than the brutal Stalinist regime in Russia, our ally to whom we handed over half of Europe, turning it into a world superpower. We look at the historical record and try to get an objective picture of what happened and to understand why individuals, groups and nations acted as they did. What are viewed as war crimes in comfortable armchair retrospection must be seen in the context both of brutal total war and of similar or comparable actions by our own side.

If there really is little evidence to support these allegations of deliberate mass murder, how can it be that they are near-universally believed?

This is a complex issue, but in outline:

After the war:

• Wartime propaganda was successful and simply continued to be believed.
• There was a need to justify the most destructive conflict in history to people at home, to our own troops and to the world in general. It was to be "The Good War" to defeat Evil:
• Germany was to be occupied and pacified. Any popular sympathy for the former regime had to be destroyed.
• Attention had to be distracted from Allied carpet bombing of German and Japanese cities, Russian mass murder and rape of civilians and the brutal expulsion of 10-15 million Germans from their homes in the East.
• The sickening conditions found in Belsen, Buchenwald, Dachau, etc. seemed to confirm the propaganda, and were exploited by the psychological warfare units.
• An image of gas, showers and burning was created around the actual showers and crematoria, and the small gas chambers where Zyklon B was used for its legitimate purpose:  to destroy lice.
• It suited the Western powers, the Soviet Union and Jewish organisations alike. The overwhelming majority of those involved almost certainly did not question it.
• There was witness testimony of mass murder in gas chambers in camps all over Germany and theAmericans created a film about the Dachau camp and its alleged gas chamber  [at 3' 40"] which was shown at the Nuremberg tribunal.
That there were gas chambers in Germany is no longer believed since as long ago as 1960. An extraordinary admission. Only the camps in Poland, then conveniently unavailable for inspection behind the Iron Curtain, continued to be considered "death camps". Since they became accessible, Auschwitz 1 has been acknowledged to be a fake by the Auschwitz Museum authorities and ground surveys at Treblinka and Belzec have produced little of substance. 


Since the late 70s:
• a "Holocaust Industry" has emerged. The subject is ever-present in the media in a way that was never the case in the thirty years that followed the war.
• belief in "the Holocaust" is imposed on Western society by a combination of:
• force of law: in most of Europe people are jailed for years or heavily penalised financially for "denying the Holocaust". Most of these laws do not date from the post-war period but were introduced in the last twenty or thirty years, in Hungary as recently as 2011
• intellectual and academic taboo: academics who raise questions are persecuted and excluded (Joel Hayward for example), with the result that only those who are prepared to toe the party line dare address "the Holocaust"
• media censorship: critical perspectives are totally absent from the mainstream media, which simply regurgitate everything they are fed by the Holocaust Industry and actively promote it (see above)
• a campaign of memorialisation that has turned "the Holocaust" into a into a dogmatic religious belief that may not be questioned, on pain of being branded a heretic and an outcast
• emotional "education" programmes which ignore objectivity, context, evidence and historical methodology in general and are little more than brainwashing; they are often taught in Religious Studies rather than in History
• branding any attempt at objective assessment as "Holocaust denial" and implying that all "deniers" are antisemitic, racist, neo-Nazi thugs 

This is the only event in the history of the world that is surrounded by such an electric fence of taboo and criminalisation, forbidding any objective historical investigation. We want to open up the memory holes so that all relevant evidence can be seen and evaluated, and to establish a fair and balanced assessment ofwhat really happened. 


Churchill wrote a 6-volume History of the Second World War. He did not mention gas chambers or extermination. Neither did Eisenhower nor De Gaulle in their memoirs. 

Was the extermination of 6 million people really so unimportant? 

How can such an extraordinary three-fold omission be explained?


Here is an outline of the Holocaust Revisionist position by Bradley Smith and Mark Weber.

For those with a little more time we recommend Joel Hayward's thesis. Hayward never identified as a Revisionist; he simply wrote an MA thesis comparing the Revisionist and orthodox arguments. He had a nervous breakdown and was almost driven out of academia. He only managed to survive by leaving his native New Zealand for Britain and abandoning any work connected with the Holocaust. He specialised in air power and has had a brilliant career becoming Dean of the RAF College at Cranwell. He is now Chair of the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at Khalifa University in Abu Dhabi. He converted to Islam, but rejects violence and extremism.

547 Why was Syria destroyed? Here are the facts.

Ray McGovern who worked all his life for the CIA has become a source of information about what is really happening in the world.

Here he explains why Syria was destroyed:
- To protect Israel, of course !
( No longer a 'crazy' idea of the Conspiracy adepts, since we read it in Hillary's 'secret' emails, where she uses the same words. )

Ray mentions the Neocons who advised Israel with their report 'Protecting the Realm", which was written by them in 1996.
They were jewish Americans with primary loyalty to Israel, not to America.

In 1999 the same jewish Americans publish 'Project for a New American Century', which says in essence:  America must bully the world for the next 100 years, into submission.
( Of course Israel will be the main beneficiary. The Americans are just paying and their safety and furure is offered for this goal.)

In their 'Rebuilding America's Defenses' they write how their army must be made stronger.
In 'Training Circular 18-01' we can read how they will work: using Smart Power: a combination of real weapons ( hard power)  and weaponised other instruments ( soft power)  like: the Media, NGO's,  Hollywood, false flags,  supporting rebels  in the target country, etc. etc.

The result: In the last 15 years 6 out of 7  targeted countries ( Listen to colonel Wesley Clark  in 2007) were destroyed.
Why?  Nobody knows.  But rumours are sent out all the time:  To fight terrorism,  to help sufferiung populations from a dictator, for the oil, etc. etc.
Official Talking Headfs will never say 'it's for Israel'.  You only read that in de-classified or hacked emails. Or in the alternative media off course.

Here is a fine interview with Ray McGovern ( 32 minutes):

Ray McGovern: The Rest of the Story behind U.S., Israel, and Syria

And here is an article which explains what I just wrote here above:

 How We Know ISIS Was Made In The USA


 

546 Nog een keer: 911.

9/11 - the final curtain:

20 Jul 2016

The end of a 15 years embargo on truth – an iceberg melting

That the event that has formed the modern world more than anything else was an inside job is the only plausible conclusion when analyzing the official facts as well as experts and eyewitnesses from then up till now. The evidence and the circumstances around the creation of the ¨war on terror‘ is more than enough to demand not only a new investigation but a lawful prosecution of the people in political power at the time of the attacks. The long awaited now released 28 ‚secret pages‘ are the tip of an already melting iceberg

von Tommy Hansen

304

16

0

The Twin Towers in New York on September 11, 2001, both towers burning quietly. The South Tower (left) is collapsing the whole 400 meters down to ground level around 10 seconds after this picture was taken. Shortly after, the North Tower collapses the same way.

With the July 2016 release of the 28 redacted pages from the 9/11 commission report, we now know that high-ranked Saudi government officials and individuals from the Saudi intelligence community were heavily involved in the 9/11 attacks in the United States in 2001. As were Israel‘s Mossad and the United States‘ CIA, all acting on behalf of the US military-industrial complex which has gained immense momentum through what is effectively a permanent „war on terror“. This war machine feeds corrupt politicians, controls and manipulates journalists and thrives on violence and conflicts. And it is time to break the silence.

The 9/11-attack was planned in the 90s as a shock therapy – a new Pearl Harbor. A war was desperately needed, were the proud American war industry not to collapse, given it no longer had a tangible enemy. Worse, the US was losing its political grip on the world, as the Soviet Union had dissolved and the Europeans and Russians were about to interact in peaceful relations. Everything, that had made America great, was about to vanish.

So in 2000, a new vision for America’s war industry was laid out. The right wing think-tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC), founded by prominent neo-conservatives like Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Richard Perle, John Bolton, Scooter Libby, Paul Wolfowitz, Robert Kagan and William Kristol, published a report after three years of intensive work, entitled ‘Rebuilding America’s Defenses’ which provided the guidelines for the rebirth of the American war industry and a way to ensure the United States would remain the world’s mightiest political and military power.

In neoconservative circles, it was believed that the only way forward was a “new Pearl Harbor” style event, and this was openly mentioned in the PNAC report; “this process of transformation is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”, the report reads.

And the events of 9/11 clearly had that effect. The nation went to war, and this time it was not against a single conflict against a dictator somewhere, but a persistent, worldwide, random war which could range wherever forces in the US and elsewhere deemed it fit to fight. And those who are “not with the US,are with the terrorists”. Remember that?

This ‘war on terror’ war has enabled the vast US war machine, backed by countries like Germany, France, England and Denmark, to bomb civilian areas in Sudan, Yemen, Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq in an attempt to kill individuals pointed out to the US-intelligence community as ‚terrorists’. It’s a never-ending and diabolicalmerry-go-round – creating terror and refugees through systematically bombing civilian areas.

Fifteen years after 9/11 almost all our respected institutions and values have gone. The US even has a law that allows its forces to intervene militarily in Europe if a US-citizen is apprehended by the International Court of Justice in The Hague. The United Nations Security Council was overruled by the US in the illegal invasion of Iraq, and nowadays US-led western forces can bomb as they please. Even the UN Human Rights Council isnow widely seen as a joke – being headed by one of the most repressive dictatorships in the world, Saudi Arabia.

Now, we even stand on the brink of a new war, also fought a long way from ‘back home in the US’. The build-up of the NATO war machine in Europe has been going on for years and has been intensified with nuclear weapons under President Barack Obama. It appears this war will be conventional, fought on European soil and a lot of Europeans will die -but that’s a risk the US is prepared to accept.

But 15 years after 9/11 we also know who was behind the 9/11 attacks and if we don’t address the issue now, humanity will be lost.

America dependent on war for decades

North America as a nation is dependent on war and has been for decades. In 2014, 57 percent of the US’ discretionary budget was allocated to ‘defense spendings’, and without this war machine running, the nation would have gone broke. Out of 238 years of history, the US has been at war for 222, almost always a long way from home, and now globally defending ‘democracy and freedom’ – or so the story goes. We literally have a war-addicted nation heading NATO, which should have been a defence union serving peace after the cataclysm of World War Two.

Two presidents tried to warn us about this development. President Dwight Eisenhower in his ‘farewell speech’ in 1961 and John F Kennedy three months later, in his so-called ‘secret societies speech’. Both were talking about the military-industrial complex, both were talking about the American “deep state” – the CIA. But since, then no one has talked about this complex, so either the problem has gone away by itself, or the complex hastaken control.

This complex was founded during the Cold War, where immense fortunes were made from preparing for a possible war, and the secret communities and secret weapon programs that were involved. There was practically no limit to the resources used by the Pentagon and the CIA to detect and fight communism and the show even beyond our planet in the so-called “space race”. As the Cold War disappeared, so did the prospects of maintaining these positions of power. And the brilliant answer was an eternal ‘war on terror’, launched right after the ‘catastrophic and catalyzing’ events of 9/11.

Very soon after 9/11, the first hints of Saudi involvement in the events surfaced. Two dozen members of Osama bin Laden’s family were urgently evacuated with private jets from the United States in the first days following the attacks. Later it came to light that 11 of the 19 hijackers had got the Visa-papers at the american consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, same place used for doing the paperwork in the trafficking of the Mujahedeen-fighters in the 80s.

.

The Israeli spy ring

But the Saudi’s were not alone in this. A 61-page DEA task-force report addresses an massive Israeli spy ring of more than 120 agents, discovered operating in the United States in 2001. 14 Israeli ‘Art Students were according to several researchers inside the twin towers with construction passes and were reported to be active agents in electronic surveillance units of the Israeli military.

These details of a spy ring that operated across the United states employing intelligence agents posing as “art students” to gain access to sensitive U.S. government offices, defense companies, and the private homes of employees of the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), started to emerge in early 2002, clearly suggesting involvement of the Israeli intelligence service, Mossad too. The report was later confirmed by the transcript of a four part Fox News Report on ‘Israeli spying in the US’.

Also, confirmed by senator Al Franken in 2004, a number of mostly jewish individuals were being warned not to go to work on 9/11 – they got ‘the jew call’ – another strong suggestion of Israeli involvement in the events. Clearly someone way up in the american circles of power knew – a fact also proved by the massive high-level insider trading on the very day, laid bare by German investigative journalist Lars Schall and several independent university studies.

An operation like those attacks, which incorporated international ties, falsified ID’s and years of traveling, planning and preparation, is simply not possible without the knowledge of various intelligence communities. And the US intelligence communities knew, something was going on. They delivered dozens of memos to President Bush W Bush on the security briefings, especially that on August 6, 2001 when they delivered a briefing with the headline: “Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US”. 

At least someone was determined, that’s for sure. But it certainly wasn’t Bin Laden doing the insider trading on the New York Stock Exchange, and no one has ever accused him of being behind the many warnings to stay away from the Towers on 9/11. And it was definitely not Osama bin Laden who called the Danish prime minister on 9/11, a few minutes before the first tower collapsed, telling him that both towers were going to come down. Still, someone did, and he wasn’t Saudi Arabian either.

A deliberate take over of power

The information surrounding the whole event point conclusively to the fact that this was a deliberate attempt totry ad take over political and military power worldwide – a process now taking place under the disguise of the ‘war on terror’, where president Bush left the rest of the world with two options: “You’re either with us, or with the terrorists/against us” [delete as appropriate. pt]. The whole scenario is like a badly composed Hollywood B-movie, where a bunch of bad guys plan to take over control of the world.

In 1976-77 George H.W. Bush was director of the CIA, and according to journalist Wayne Madsen and others he used the Saudi intelligence service as “his own private CIA” to run black operations disapproved of – or even totally without knowledge of – the US Congress.These operations, we now know, were almost always connected to drug smuggling or gun running and were often used to initiate regime changes in countries criticalof the USA. Through the Saudi intelligence services, the criminal US-neocons literally got themselves a ‘black CIA’ to do the dirtiest of their already very dirty business.

The Bush and Bin Laden families had been doing businesses for more than 20 years, and the young George W. Bush, later president, founded his first oil company partly with money from the Bin Laden family. Also the Bush empire had been growing businesses with the Saudi royal family and numerous princes in Saudi Arabia. The Bin Laden family was even an official investor in the Carlyle Group until the fall of 2001 where the relationship became too embarrassing and the family withdrew its money.

Through the 90s as the US war industry was fighting for survival, PNAC and others were advocating for an invasion of Iraq, as it was seen as the only realistic way for the future of the military-industrial complex in the US to be assured. Moreover, a US presence in Iraq would give access to huge oil resources and pave the way for decades of new business-making conflicts. Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the PNAC even sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating “a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq”, or “regime change”. 

The letter suggested that “any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq,” even if no evidence surfaced linking Iraq to the September 11 attacks. The letter warned that allowing Hussein to remain in power would be “an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism”.

Back in 1998, the PNAC had written exactly the same to president Clinton: “We urge you to turn your Administration’s attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts”. The letter as signed by Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, later Secretary and Deputy Secretary of Defense in the Bush-administration.

The evidence surfacing shortly after 9/11 didn’t point to Iraq, but towards Saudi Arabia and Israel. While the evidence involving Israel is yet to be addressed, the engagement of the state of Saudi Arabia is now out in the open.

„A long and sordid history of financing global terror“

According to US Senator Bob Graham, who has long fought for the declassification of the 28 Saudi’ pages: “The Saudis have a long and sordid history of financing global terror movements, providing the seed money for Al Qaeda as far back as the 1980s, and also providing startup capital for the Taliban [in Afghanistan].”

This 15-year embargo on the truth, Graham says, offers functional “immunity” to the Saudi regime, still complicit in “funding terror organizations such as ISIS,” and which is “training the next generation of terrorists in mosques and schools”.

What Graham points out should be obvious to anyone at this point of time, regardless of the 28 pages: That through decades of co-operation with the corrupt Saudi dictatorship the criminal American neocons have gained not only immense personal fortunes, but a global political leadership that seems to have blinded the democracies in the West. Everything in the ‘Rebuilding Americas Defences’ has come through, even the ‘new Pearl Harbor’.

Through a strategy of mostly proxy wars, the US was ready to invade Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan & Iran in October 2001, in all cases to install a US-friendly regime and m¡aintain the Petrodollar-business. The ‘War on terror’ made it all possible, and all the mentioned countries are now on their knees.

From the Pentagon Papers (2012) published in 2015 by Judicial Watch we know that the US was willingly and heavily arming groups like Al-Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists in northern Iraq because these groups were fighting against the declared US enemy, democratically elected President Bashar al Assad in Syria. The many different groups armed by both the CIA and Pentagon are now even sometimes fighting each other..

Again: Proxy war to secure american interests

This is exactly what happened in Afghanistan in the 80s; a proxy war to secure American interests. On October 6, 2009, then- Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated on CBS, that Al Qaeda in Afghanistan was created by the United States:

“It seemed like a great idea, back in the 80s to – embolden – and train and equip – Taliban, mujahidin, jihadists against the Soviet Union, which had invaded Afghanistan. And with our help, and with the Pakistani support– this group– including, at that time, Bin Laden, defeated the Soviet Union. Drove them out of Afghanistan, eventually”, Clinton said in CBS News Special Report: The Road Ahead.

But that was only partly true. Apparently she forgot the famous interview with President Jimmy Carter’s security advisor, Zbigbiew Brzezinski in ‘Le Nouvel Observateur’, Paris on 21. January 2007. When asked about the Mujahedeen, Brzezinski said: “According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980. That is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”

So not only did the US arm and create Al Queda, but it was not in order to support the resistance against the Sovjet occupation of Afghanistan, it was to provoke the occupation. A proxy war, and the makers of this plan are to be found in the dark circles in the upper echelons of the American political, military and intelligence community – the military-industrial complex which two presidents have tried to warn us against. The military-industrial complex which no one even discusses anymore. Either the problem is gone or these powers already have taken over.

The fact is the western mainstream media in general is controlled by powers very friendly to the US, and its silence and ignorance around 9/11 is just one example. According to Watergate-journalist Carl Bernstein 400 american journalists were on the payroll of the CIA in 1974 when the cold war were at its height and in 2015 a widely known German journalist, Udo Ulfkotte, published a book where he laid open the ongoing and very active role of the CIA in German news organisations.

The CIA works on behalf of the American war machine, and operates at every level: Media, politicians and NGO’s and has done so for decades. Through this almost complete control it has succeeded in changing a prosperous future in Europe, with co-operation and open borders throughout the continent, into a likely disaster. Already, millions have died in this diabolic invention, the ‘war on terror’, declared by a country desperately dependent on war. To think that this machine could not be behind 9/11 is, in light of the facts, naive. This machine thrives onwar, and the politicians going along with it are making millions by pretending that we are all the good guys. Reality says differently, and it is time to break the silence.

The release of the 28 pages, overdue since 2003, is a great step forward. But tens of thousands of documents are still kept secret because of ‘national security’.

For instance, still missing from public scrutiny are documents about the involvement of government-sponsored Saudi religious institutions in supporting al Qaeda as well as documents about Al-Qaeda’s wealthy Gulf donors and support by Islamic banks and financial institutions.  And there is also no mention of the fact that 11 of the 9/11 ‘hijackers’ got their visa papers at the American consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia – same place that arranged the papers for thousands of Mujahedeens in the 80s.

It is increasingly clear that insiders in the American state apparatus played a major role in the 9/11 event, now proven with very likely co-operation from associates at government level in S,audi Arabia – a country defendingWahhabism – the most perverted form of Islam – and systematically – with bombs and terror – trying to destroy all opponents. A country that should be put before the International Court in The Hague along with the most likely perpetrators behind 9/11 and the defenders of wars based on lies. We even know where to start: Bush,both senior and junior, Tony Blair and Anders “Fog of War” Rasmussen, Dick Cheney andColin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz – the rest will come along as we go.

If you look at the greater picture, the US, Saudi Arabia and Israel have been systematically killing millions of people for decades, boosting the war industry, first and foremost in America, but also in countries like Sweden, Germany, England, France and others, where both selected politicians and journalists are equally controlled, both groups being rewarded with personal wealth and a jet-set life.

Based on evidence and simple logic we can exclude the official 9/11 story as an outrageous conspiracy theory. But would the powers that be lie to us on this scale on such a grave matter? And if so, why?

In October 1990, a 15-year-old girl stood crying before the American House of Representative’s Human Rights Caucus. She testified that Iraqi soldiers who had invaded Kuwait on August 2nd that year, tore hundreds of babies from hospital incubators and killed them. Television flashed her testimony around the world and Saddam Hussein was now portrayed by U.S. president George Bush not only as “the Butcher of Baghdad” but “a tyrant worse than Hitler”. 

Coalition forces invaded Kuwait City on February 27, 1991 – but the story about the babies was fantasy. The young girl had been instructed by Hill & Knowltons Washington office, a public relations firm hired to rally the U.S. populace behind Bush’s policy of going to war. The man running Hill & Knowlton’s Washington office was Craig Fuller, one of Bush’s closest friends and inside political advisors. A full-scale invasion based on a deliberate lie.

On February 5th, 2003, Colin Powel stood for the United Nations, presenting ‘evidence’ of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Only we now know he too, lied.

Powell played an intercept of a conversation between Iraqi army officers about the UN inspections. However, when he translated what they were saying, he knowingly embellished it, turning it from evidence Iraq was complying with U.N. resolutions into evidence that Iraq was violating them.

The whole U.S. case—relating to biological weapons—was based on the direct knowledge of a single agent known as Curveball, whose credibility had previously been cast in serious doubt. It was all lies, not a single such weapon was found,  either by the weapon inspectors or by the western forces, which invaded Iraq in 2003. A full-scale invasion based on a deliberate lie.

The initial attack on Iraq cost far more than the lives of 100,000 people and the wounding of even more. It is still seen by many as the world’s largest terrorist attack ever – at least that’s how it feels when you’re at the wrong side of the bombs.

At least twice in recent history the US has sent the world into wars based on deliberate lies. So why not on 9/11?

But now, It seems for an increasing number of people around the world the case of 9/11 is solved, and the story about the 19 hijackers with box cutters, remotely controlled from a cave in a mountain in Afghanistan by the ultra-bad Osama bin Laden, is regarded as what is is – a fairy tale. And the official explanation, an insult to common intelligence.

The iceberg is melting. Lies may have been travelling half way around the world for decades, but now, the truth has finally got its boots on.