I love his book "A Century of War".
But I always noted that there was almost never any mentioning of Israel or jews in his articles.
His mothers maiden name is Ruth Rishoff, whic is to me a very jewish sounding name.
In his latest article on NEO he wants to tellthe world that the Bilderbergeers and the Vatican are ruling the world.
To be able to do that he must go back to 1932, a time when all religion was eradicated in Russia, and a time when The West was very afraid of Communism to conquer western Europe.
That is when Pope Pius XII saw in Hitler a companion against this existential threat for the Chirch.
So, Bilderberg and The Vatican are the ones who like to bring these muslim people to our countries. That is what Engdahl says. He does not give the mortive that the Pope would have for that.
Why is Engdahl going back so far in time, and why is he pointing at such weak agents as the Power that be?
Why does not he point at Israels Yinon Plan? ( 1982)
At A Clean Break (1997)
At the Neocons who are all jewish and act as if Israel is their first concers and use America on behalf of Israel.
In Haaretz in 2003 we could read that Thomas Freedman himself said that it was the Neocosn who wanted Iraq destroyed.
Mr. Engdahl. It's so easy. Its so visible. It's so well documented.
Why do you lie to us, on behalf of Israel ?
Below I have Engdahl's article, annotated by myself. (Sometimes in Dutch.)
--------------------
Vatican,
Bilderberg and a ‘Migration’ Crisis
Column: Society
Region: Europe
The annual
meeting of the secretive Bilderberg Group took place this year in Dresden,
Germany from June 9-12. Notable is their terminology in an official press
release announcing topics for discussion. Point three (not necessarily in terms
of importance) is curiously titled “Europe: migration, growth, reform, vision, unity.” Curious is
the choice of the word “migration” for the EU refugee crisis that began in
Spring 2015 as Turkey opened the detention centers and refugee camps from
Syrian war refugees and pointed them to the EU. More about that later on. Here
I want to concentrate on the little-known historical ties or links between the
Bilderberg Meetings, founded in 1954, and the Vatican, and the role of both in
heating up the current EU refugee instability.
In May, 1954 in Oosterbeek, near
to the German border, a highly secret meeting was held at the Hotel de
Bilderberg. The meeting was hosted by Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands,
husband of Queen Juliana. It was called simply, “Bilderberg Conference,” from
the name of the hotel where the first talks were held. Out of three days of
private discussion, a new Trans-Atlantic think-tank was created. It was to
become one of the most effective organizations for influencing world events
after 1954 up to the present, and one of the most damaging and secretive.
German-born Prince Bernhard was a
controversial figure, a notorious philanderer, who had been a member of the
German NSDAP and Reiter SS. In 1976 Bernhard was accused of accepting a $1
million bribe from the US fighter aircraft maker, Lockheed, to influence jet
purchases by the Dutch Air Force. When Bernhard was forced to resign because of the
scandals, he was succeeded as Bilderberg Chairman by then German
Bundespräsident, Walter Scheel, and then afterwards by Britain’s Lord Carrington, a
confidante and later business partner of Henry Kissinger. From the beginning it
was clear Bilderberg was not the Little League of world politics.
In 2014 the Bilderberg Group’s
official website, with sparse information, stated its purpose as simply to,
“foster dialogue between Europe and North America.” It adds that it meets once
a year with around 120 select attendees from finance, politics, industry, media
and academia. Its rules mandate that two-thirds come from Europe and the
remainder from the USA and Canada, with one third of the total always from the
world of politics. Bilderberg participants from the US are always members of
the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR).
Shadowy
origins
The Bilderberg Group, in the words
of the first Bilderberg Secretary General, a shadowy and enormously influential Polish
exile, Joseph Retinger, came from an initiative Retinger made in 1952 to counter, “growing
distrust of America which was making itself manifest in Western Europe and
which was paralleled by a similar distrust of Western Europe in America.” In
brief, its aim was to make
certain that the strategic policy orientation of Western Europe and of the
United States was in harmony. The decisive question to be asked was
harmony in pursuit of
which and whose
geopolitical goals?
Joseph
Retinger
Joseph Retinger was one of the
most influential political figures shaping the pro-Atlanticist architecture of
post-World War II Western Europe. He founded the Strasbourg-based Council of Europe, to
lobby for the Washington-backed plan for creation of a United States of Europe,
today called the European Union. He created the CIA-funded European Movement, as well as the CIA-funded European Youth Campaign.
By far his most influential project was bringing the Bilderberg Group into being, and
serving as its key European director and Secretary General, all far away from
the public eye, as he preferred.
At the time his Bilderberg project
took form the Korean War was ending and US Marshall Plan aid to Europe as well.
Józef Hieronim Retinger had spent the war years in London as adviser to the
exile government of Prime Minister General Wladyslaw Sikorski. While Retinger’s name was
virtually unknown to the world at large, he was one of the most influential
string-pullers of the postwar period in Europe and the United States. He was
able to get private
audiences with the Pope
as well as the American
President at will.
It was he who selected Prince Bernhard to act as figurehead host and who
selected which Americans and which Europeans would be invited to Bilderberg.
The American Steering Committee
for the first Bilderberg Meeting in 1954 consisted of USA chairman Joseph E.
Johnson, president of the Rockefeller-tied Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace. Others included George
Ball, who during the Second World War was in London serving as director of the Strategic
Bombing Survey, to analyze the impact of British and American bombing of
German cities and civilian populations.
The American Bilderberg Steering Committee also
included H. J. Heinz II, of the food group and father-in-law of John Kerry’s
current wife; George Nebolsine, a State Department consultant on the Marshall
Plan; and Dean Rusk, then President of the Rockefeller Foundation, later Secretary
of State.
The real guiding hand behind the
American side of the Bilderberg Group, however, was the first head of the
newly-established Central
Intelligence Agency, General Walter Bedell Smith. In 1950 Smith became Director of the CIA.
The CIA helped organize, and sponsored the formation, and operation of the
Bilderberg Conferences.
In late 1952, Retinger went to
America to test his Bilderberg idea on his American contacts, where he met with
Averell Harriman, David Rockefeller, and Bedell Smith, then director of the
CIA. After Retinger explained his proposal, Smith reportedly said, “Why the
hell didn’t you come to me in the first place?” The CIA chief then told
Retinger to go to C. D. Jackson, who was about to become President Eisenhower’s Special
Assistant for Psychological Warfare, and Eisenhower’s liaison between the Pentagon and CIA. viii
The attendees at the 1954 initial
Bilderberg Meeting included David Rockefeller, who today is the only Bilderberg
“Advisory Group” Member. It included State Department official, Paul Nitze. As
well, Gardner Cowles, US media baron and founder of Look magazine, who had been
the US Government deputy director of the Office of War Information, the US
propaganda ministry that created the Voice of America (VOA). It included J.P.
Morgan Bank director Nelson D. Jay, a close Rockefeller associate.
The first Bilderberg attendees
also included C.D. Jackson, by then Eisenhower’s architect of the Cold War;
Alcide de Gasperi, Italian Prime Minister; and Antoine Pinay, a former French
Prime Minister. Pinay was
to become, the decisive personality shaping the long-term agenda of Bilderberg.
In Retinger’s words he founded
Bilderberg Group simply to, “foster
dialogue between Europe and North America.” That was for public consumption.
In reality he built a very dark agenda that drew in the most reactionary circles in postwar Europe
and tied them to the most powerful of postwar American oligarch families, that of Rockefeller, Harriman and
their emerging “American
Century.” The Bilderberg Group was to insure that that Century would be
heavily influenced by postwar
Vatican geopolitics. Its first meeting in 1954 was funded by Walter
Bedell Smith’s CIA, with subsequent meetings financed by the CIA’s close ally
during the Cold War, the Ford Foundation.
Le Cercle—The
Vatican-Rockefeller Alliance
The key to the extraordinary power and
influence of the annual Bilderberg Meetings from 1954 laid in the unpublished role of the
secretive pan-Europeanist organization then known as Le Cercle, sometimes referred to as Cercle Pinay, a reference
to the pivotal role in shaping Bilderberg played by the network of French Prime
Minister Antoine Pinay, an intimate friend of Bilderberg founder Retinger.
Pinay’s Le Cercle (The Group) was the link that covertly tied most
European intelligence services including the German BND and BfV, MI-6 in
Britain, France’s SDECE, Holland’s BVD, Belgium’s Surete de l’Etat and Swiss
and later even Saudi intelligence and apartheid South Africa’s secret service,
BOSS. Prominent politicians associated with Pinay and Le Cercle included Franz Josef Strauss, Otto von
Habsburg, Konrad Adenauer,
Julio Andreotti of
Italy, General Antonio de Spinola of Portugal, a conservative who went on later
to become President; Margaret
Thatcher and Ronald
Reagan.
Antoine Pinay’s group, Le Cercle,
in turn was tied as well to the powerful and very right-wing Roman Catholic lay organization, Opus Dei, which had just been given final
Catholic Church official approval in 1950, two years before plans for
Bilderberg began, by Pope
Pius XII. The organization was made well known, to its discomfort,
as a subject of the 2003 Dan Brown historical novel, Da Vinci Code.
Among the later achievements of Le Cercle
was the manipulation of
the 1979 British elections that successfully brought in anti-labor right-wing
Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. It was done with Le Cercle leading
members, Sir Brian Crozier,
MI-6 head Sir Arthur Franks,
and MI-6 division head, Nicholas
Elliott.
Wacht even: Le
Cercle is pro EU. Maar Thatcher was NIET
pro REU ?! ( JV)
The late Bavarian political czar,
Franz Josef Strauss, “The Lion of Bavaria,” noted in his memoirs that he had
held a friendship with Le Cercle’s Antoine Pinay since the two first met in
1953. Le Cercle networks in Germany promoted Strauss’s candidacy, unsuccessfully,
to become German Chancellor. In 1955 Strauss also became a regular
member of the Bilderberg Meetings.
Bilderberg founder, Josef
Retinger, a Polish-born Roman Catholic, organized his European network of the
Bilderberg through the mediation of an Italian CIA asset, Prof. Luigi Gedda,
head of Azione Cattolica. Gedda was also medical adviser to Pope Pius XII, a very strong
right-wing anti-communist pontiff, who before the Second World War, as
Cardinal Eugenio Giovanni Pacelli, had been architect of the 1933 Reichskonkordat with Hitler’s Nazi Party.
Already in 1932 Pacelli as
Vatican Secretary of State had played a key role in convincing Roman Catholic
German Chancellor Franz von Papen to steer his Catholic Center Party into an
anti-left alliance and
join with the NSDAP of Hitler.
NB: In 1932 was er voor de Kerk eéén
grote bedreiging: het communisme ! ( Dat schaft de religie af. ) Logisch dat de
Paus die organisaties steunt die fel tegen het communisme zijn.
In 1932 ! Toen was er nauwelijks iets mis met Hitler. Engdashl is joods, en heeft uiteraard een
hekel aan Hitler èn aan de Katholieke Kerk.
Engdahl schrijft mooie woorden over de
inval in Irak ( dat het fout was etc.) Maar NOOIT heeft hij gezegd dat zijn neefjes die inval
hebben beraamd en doorgedrukt.
NYT columnist Tomas Friedman schreef
het nochtans vrij helder op in Haaretz,
in 2003: Zie mijn blog 574. Friedman zei: “Is
the Iraq war the great neoconservative war? It's the war the neoconservatives
wanted, Friedman says. It's the war the neoconservatives marketed. Those people
had an idea to sell when September 11 came, and they sold it. Oh boy, did they
sell it. So this is not a war that the masses demanded. This is a war of an
elite. Friedman laughs: I could give you the names of 25 people (all of whom
are at this moment within a five-block radius of this office) who, if you had
exiled them to a desert island a year and a half ago, the Iraq war would not
have happened.”
(J.V: this is almost the same as what Henry Ford said: "Corral the 50 wealthiest jews
and there will be no wars." )
Clerical
fascism and Pius XII
As Pope, Pius XII had a clear
political bias and it was towards support of clerical or nominally Roman
Catholic fascist or extremely repressive right-wing regimes, a form of what
some termed clerical fascism, the fusion of the Church with fascist or
dictatorial political regimes, such as in Franco’s Spain or Spinola’s Portugal.
During the Second World War Pius
XII refused to condemn the clerical fascist pro-Hitler regime of Roman Catholic
Ante Pavelić, the leader of the newly proclaimed Croatian state. Informed by
Catholic clergy of the genocidal murders of Orthodox Serbs who had refused to
embrace the Catholic faith, Pius XII, even though he possessed a list of
Croatian clergy members who had “joined in the slaughter,” did not condemn the
Pavelić regime or take action against the clergy involved. Instead he elevated
Aloysius Stepinac—a Croatian archbishop convicted of collaborating with the
Ustaše—to Cardinal.
JV: Dat was zeker een weinig
christelijke keuze van de Paus. Maar de oorlog tegen het communisme was in
volle gang. De aartsvijand van de Kerk. Oorlog is oorlog. Dan wordt de vijand
gedood. Voor de Kerk waren de Serven de vijand.
In effect, Retinger’s European
Bilderberg networks linked the extreme right-wing European anti-communist
networks—including the Vatican of Pius XII, of Opus Dei, of the Franco
government in Spain, of Portugal’s General Spinola and numerous other
right-wing European anti-communist networks—to the triumphant American elites
around the powerful Rockefeller group, through the networks and person of David
Rockefeller. It was a power marriage that was to have a profound effect on the
development of postwar European society and politics.
Nogmaals: Amerika en de Kerk en
Spanje en Portugal hadden een gezamenlijke vijand: het communisme.
Dat Amerika bereid is om met
fascisten samen te werken zien we ook vandaag nog in Kiev.
Now against this background of
Bilderberg true history, the question to be asked is whether the first Jesuit
Pope in history, Francis, is following in the heavy footsteps of Pius XII? Is
he deliberately trying to stir things up in Europe through his support of the
huge influx of war refugees from Syria and North Africa in the past year?
Words are an essential form of
human communication, quite complex in the energy they convey to others.
Depending on the word and its context, it can convey negative energy, hate
energy; it can convey neutral energy, neither here nor there; it can also
convey love, harmony, peace energy. If there is any organized group on the face
of this Earth that is master of such word use precision it is the Society of
Jesus, Pope Francis’ mother organization. This is relevant in reading his
numerous missives on the population disruptions of the Middle East and Africa
and the EU in the past three years.
There are three words being
loosely thrown about today in regard to the EU crisis, and crisis it is. There
is the word, “refugee,”
legally defined as “a person who has been forced to leave their country in order
to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster.” Then there is the
related term, “asylum-seeker”
defined as “a person who has left their home country as a political refugee and
is seeking asylum in another.” Third there is the entirely different
concept behind the word used both by Pope Francis and by the 2016 Bilderberg
Meeting in Dresden, namely the
word “migrant.”
Migrant is precisely defined as “a person who moves from one place to another in order to find work or
better living conditions.” Here there is no mention of war, political
persecution or life-endangering calamity.
By calling it what it clearly is
not, a migration into the EU from the south, the word completely blunts the causes behind that
migration, namely a US-UK-France-instigated
series of wars, wars for
control of oil and now gas, wars in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Syria, initially called by
Hillary Clinton the Arab Spring. The million-plus human beings streaming into
the EU from Turkey over the past fifteen months are no migrants. They are
refugees from wars.
In calling them migrants it
implicitly makes either racist or bigot anyone questioning the legal procedures
employed by the Merkel government and the German Federal Office for Migration
and Refugees (BAMF). According to reliable investigative reports conveyed to
this author, the German Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) since
November 2014 has abandoned
the rules and legal directives for
refugees (not asylum seekers) for no public reason and without any notice to
the public. Interesting.
JV: These last sentences may be interesting,
but sadly I do not understand them at this moment.
“Structural
Reality?”
In a Papal Message of January 17,
2016, the Pope declared, “In our time, migration is growing worldwide…Migration
movements are now a structural reality, and our primary issue must be to deal
with the present emergency phase by providing programmes which address the
causes of migration and the changes it entails, including its effect on the
makeup of societies and peoples.” He goes on, “Biblical revelation urges us to
welcome the stranger; it tells us that in so doing, we open our doors to God,
and that in the faces of others we see the face of Christ himself.”
What if that stranger wants to kill you and to rape your daughters?
Very well, mr Engdahl. The Pope is
secretly happy with this influx of muslims into Western Europe. That is what you
want to make us believe. He should have
said ‘refugees’ and not migrants. He should have said: Keep them out ! (That would not have been very Christian
though) .
But, mr Engdahl, why use such flimsy ‘evidence’ when
there is firm evidence at hand for another explanation? In the Isrtaeli paper Haaretz we could read
that the Iraq war was caused by jews in the Americanb government ( my blog
574). We can see that upheaval in all Israels neighbouring countries is the
goal of Oded Yinon ( 1982) aln also of the Neocons in their Clean Break advise
to Netanyahu ( 1997). Why go back
to 1932 and to the use of this or that
word, if you have motive end perpetrator
right at hand ?
Mr.Engdahl, you are protecting
Israel by spreading misleading information. You may be jewish, as youyr mother was named
Ruth Rishoff. Thatmight be your motive. I have no idea.
Nice words these are indeed. It
ignores entirely the actual disruptive reality of the flood of war refugees
into Germany and the rest of the EU. Rather than to focus his immense influence
on bringing about peace and reconciliation of all domestic parties in Syria and
condemning the terrorism of ISIS, Al Qaeda/Al-Nusra Front and the others
destroying one of the oldest cultures in the world, a poly-religious one,
Francis chooses to tell Europeans to open their hearts and even homes to the
“migrants.” In this context, as I noted at the start, it is highly significant
that this year’s Dresden Bilderberg Meeting referred in their discussion to
“Migration” not Refugee Crisis. It appears both the Pope and Bilderberg
planners are singing from the same sheet of music on this at least.
On January 6, in his message on
the feast of Epiphany, the same Pope released a Papal video in which he called
for creating a one world religion in effect: “Many think differently, feel
differently, seeking God or meeting God in different ways. In this crowd, in
this range of religions, there is only one certainty that we have for all: we
are all children of God.”
Some days later, January 11, 2016
in an address to the Vatican diplomatic corps, Francis insisted that Europe has
the means to absorb migrants without sacrificing its security or culture. He
criticized the distinction made by the international community between refugees
fleeing persecution and those fleeing poverty, referring to “the grave crisis
of migration which we are facing.” He condemned various EU national attempts to
find their own national solutions to this crisis of migration: “…there is no
place for autonomous solutions pursued by individual states, since the
consequences of the decisions made by each inevitably have repercussions on the
entire international community. Indeed, migrations, more than ever before, will
play a pivotal role in the future of our world.”
Unlike Francis, I firmly believe
that borders DO matter, that national autonomy, like individual autonomy, does
matter, is in fact, an essential component of our existence, our individual
sovereignty our national sovereignty. We human beings are unique individuals
every one. We are not some amorphous blob with no individuality. These
differences are sacred in my view. Not according to the words of the Jesuit
Pope. Our world with all its wars and deep disturbances is not at the state of
nirvana which Pope Francis would like us to believe where peace and Christian
charity overcome every obstacle. It well may be in the future but to pretend it
already is belies in my view a hidden agenda.
David Rockefeller is an open
partisan of a one world order where he and his ilk would sit atop all mankind,
a disgusting idea. For such a one economic world, we must dissolve national
borders. This, the Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is designed
to do in large part, if, that is, EU leaders are suicidal enough to agree. Then
to control an entire world, it needs a synthetic new religion. The forced
refugee crisis is designed to blur national borders and historical ethnic or
national culture. There is far more behind all the nice speeches of the Pope
and the talks of Bilderberg than we are being told. It’s not without reason
that the word “Jesuitical” in ordinary usage means “one using subtle or
oversubtle reasoning; crafty; sly; intriguing.”
F. William
Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree
in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil
and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”
http://journal-neo.org/2016/12/17/vatican-bilderberg-and-a-migration-crisis/
http://journal-neo.org/2016/12/17/vatican-bilderberg-and-a-migration-crisis/
