The offer is so huge (on the internet alone) that one can spend a full life reading it all. So the trick is to find the good stuff.
It doesn't have to be recent to be good.
An author that I discovered today was Dr. Frank Legge (Perth Australia.)
In my own words he says something like this:
"The official explanation for the collapse of the Twin Towers and of WTC 7 is that the iron was weakened by the fires.
Fine.
But the fires were not at all homogenous ( and symmetrical) through the buildings.
Some area's were much hotter, others had hardly any fires ( like parts of WTC7).
Yet all three the buildings came down very symmetrically.
This is only possible if the iron in the whole building would 'give up' to support the building at exactly the same second.
Even with a perfect homogenous and symmetrical fire this would be very improbable to happen.
For it to happen in three buildings is nothing less than a miracle."
My suggestion:
What we could do is this: any high rise building that has to be demolished will ( from now on) be handed over to the scientists who wrote the NIST report.
The are allowed to build a fire as symmetrical and homogenous and as hot as they can, using all the kerosine they like.
If ever they succeed to cause a symmetrical collapse (straight down) all 911 Truthers will 'rest their case'.
Here is the article of mr Legge.
( Do not miss the 118 eye-witness statements of firefighters who heard explosions: here.
Read also the very convincing rebuttal of the 'softening metal' theory: here. )
-----------------------
Another article, which is a chapter from a book that was published last month, also made an impression on me.
It shows to what detail Truthers have studied the subject, and how convincing they are when they show us that the head of the CIA was telling lies under oath to the 911 Commission.
Here is the article.
Here is the book and the reviews.
The one star reviewer on Amazon ( RT, 2 july 2011) sees 3 groups of 911 activists:
1. The crazy ones, possibly secretly funded by the government, to damage the imago of all truthers.
2. The Truthers who know that parts of the US government and the Mossad (and possibly some Al Quaida agents) did 911.
3. The Truthers ( like RT himself) who just want to show everybody in the world how impossible the official version of 911 is, and who ask for better investigation to find out who is guilty.
I, Jan Verheul, belong to the second group.
But I will always search for facts that falsify my hypothesis.
The 3rd group asks for futher investigation, and this is normally 'the wise thing to do.'
But we are in 2011 now, and already in 2004 David Ray Griffin was criticised rightly for just asking 'new investigation'. ( see George Trinkaus.)
It just means that nothing will happen.
There will never be a new investigation as long as there is no revolt.
Because the ones who did it all, who were behind the 'inside job' are still the ones in Power.
Here is how Trinkaus analyses the situation and shows us the ineffective stance of Griffin :
"So, in his Part Two, Griffin abandons Inside Job, mounts a safer horse and gallops on toward his Conclusion, his final posture. This is, incredibly, a plea to the government for a "full investigation." The impetus for such a phenomenon would come from the Fourth Estate. "It is only when the press leads the way that there can be an official investigation," declares Griffin. OK, class, let's get this straight. A fascist military junta, on the heels of a stolen election, blows up 3000 people, then on this pretext goes to war in three theatres, one being its own citizenry, to whom it declares, "You are either with us or against us."
The junta threatens another national-security event bigger and uglier than 911. It squelches all police-agency investigations. It rigs two bogus official investigations. It conducts a cover-up and big-lie propaganda in the mass media and in the foundation-funded left media, both of which the junta has under its totalitarian control. All the above Griffin, in his own elusive way, has acknowledged in pages preceding. Still the coy professor is insisting that right action under these extenuating circumstances is to petition that same fascist government and its controlled media. Well, I guess that's just the sensible, respectable, reasonable, and grown-up thing to do. Had we but world enough and time ...
George Trinkaus has an interesting CV and website.
Here he mentions some books that show us how the Media are used to mislead all of us.
This is what it all result to, according to mr Trinkaus: “Roll over, Machiavelli!”
George Trinkaus has an interesting CV and website.
Here he mentions some books that show us how the Media are used to mislead all of us.
A Mass-Media Bibliography
It's not just spin, folks. Meet the pro-active media campaign. A few practitioners of propaganda in the 1920's wrote about their work with a candor never encountered today.
How We Advertised America by George Creel (1920). The author directed the selling of World War I to a gullible public. Archive
Public Opinion by Walter Lippman (1922). A journalist writes honestly about the media culture. Free E-book
Propaganda by Edward Bernays (1928) “The father of Public Relations” writes with surprising candor about his work. Amazon.com
Two media critics neglected today:
The Mind Managers by Herbert Schiller (1973). The author was at work on media criticism decades before it became fashionable. Way deeper than the Norman Soloman's of today. Case studies of The National Geographic and other established brain-washing media. Amazon.com
The Rape of the Masses by Serge Chatokin (1940). Subtitle: "The Psychology of Totalitarian Political Propaganda." (Rare)
This is what it all result to, according to mr Trinkaus: “Roll over, Machiavelli!”
